search for: dummy_handl

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 64 matches for "dummy_handl".

Did you mean: dummy_handler
2015 Mar 19
0
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] qspinlock stuff -v15
...pvspin = true; __visible void xen_lock_spinning(struct arch_spinlock *lock, __ticket_t want) { int irq = __this_cpu_read(lock_kicker_irq); @@ -217,6 +243,7 @@ static void xen_unlock_kick(struct arch_spinlock *lock, __ticket_t next) } } } +#endif /* !QUEUE_SPINLOCK */ static irqreturn_t dummy_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) { @@ -280,8 +307,15 @@ void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void) return; } printk(KERN_DEBUG "xen: PV spinlocks enabled\n"); +#ifdef CONFIG_QUEUE_SPINLOCK + pv_lock_ops.queue_spin_lock_slowpath = __pv_queue_spin_lock_slowpath; + pv_lock_ops.queue_spin_unlock =...
2015 Mar 19
0
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] qspinlock stuff -v15
...pvspin = true; __visible void xen_lock_spinning(struct arch_spinlock *lock, __ticket_t want) { int irq = __this_cpu_read(lock_kicker_irq); @@ -217,6 +243,7 @@ static void xen_unlock_kick(struct arch_spinlock *lock, __ticket_t next) } } } +#endif /* !QUEUE_SPINLOCK */ static irqreturn_t dummy_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) { @@ -280,8 +307,15 @@ void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void) return; } printk(KERN_DEBUG "xen: PV spinlocks enabled\n"); +#ifdef CONFIG_QUEUE_SPINLOCK + pv_lock_ops.queue_spin_lock_slowpath = __pv_queue_spin_lock_slowpath; + pv_lock_ops.queue_spin_unlock =...
2015 Apr 07
0
[PATCH v15 12/15] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable PV qspinlock for Xen
...= true; __visible void xen_lock_spinning(struct arch_spinlock *lock, __ticket_t want) { int irq = __this_cpu_read(lock_kicker_irq); @@ -217,6 +263,7 @@ static void xen_unlock_kick(struct arch_spinlock *lock, __ticket_t next) } } } +#endif /* CONFIG_QUEUE_SPINLOCK */ static irqreturn_t dummy_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) { @@ -280,8 +327,16 @@ void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void) return; } printk(KERN_DEBUG "xen: PV spinlocks enabled\n"); +#ifdef CONFIG_QUEUE_SPINLOCK + __pv_init_lock_hash(); + pv_lock_ops.queue_spin_lock_slowpath = __pv_queue_spin_lock_slowpath; + pv_lock...
2014 Apr 02
0
[PATCH v8 10/10] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable qspinlock PV support for XEN
...+ * If an interrupt happens here, it will leave the wakeup irq + * pending, which will cause xen_poll_irq() to return + * immediately. + */ + + /* Block until irq becomes pending (or perhaps a spurious wakeup) */ + xen_poll_irq(irq); +} +#endif /* CONFIG_QUEUE_SPINLOCK */ + static irqreturn_t dummy_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) { BUG(); @@ -258,7 +349,6 @@ void xen_uninit_lock_cpu(int cpu) per_cpu(irq_name, cpu) = NULL; } - /* * Our init of PV spinlocks is split in two init functions due to us * using paravirt patching and jump labels patching and having to do @@ -275,8 +365,14 @@ voi...
2008 Apr 22
3
[PATCH 0/3] ia64/pv_ops preparation
Hi. This patchset is preparation patches for ia64/pv_ops support. They are almost trivial and mainly make kernel paravirtualization friendly. thanks, Diffstat: arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c | 1 - include/asm-ia64/intrinsics.h | 11 +++++++++++ include/asm-ia64/mmu_context.h | 6 +----- include/asm-ia64/smp.h | 2 ++ include/asm-ia64/system.h | 10 ++++++++-- 5 files
2015 Jan 20
0
[PATCH v14 11/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable PV qspinlock for XEN
...cause xen_poll_irq() to return + * immediately. + */ + + /* Block until irq becomes pending (or perhaps a spurious wakeup) */ + xen_poll_irq(irq); + spin_time_accum_blocked(start); + return 0; +} +PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK(xen_halt_cpu); + +#endif /* CONFIG_QUEUE_SPINLOCK */ + static irqreturn_t dummy_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) { BUG(); @@ -258,7 +373,6 @@ void xen_uninit_lock_cpu(int cpu) per_cpu(irq_name, cpu) = NULL; } - /* * Our init of PV spinlocks is split in two init functions due to us * using paravirt patching and jump labels patching and having to do @@ -275,8 +389,17 @@ voi...
2015 Jan 20
0
[PATCH v14 11/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable PV qspinlock for XEN
...cause xen_poll_irq() to return + * immediately. + */ + + /* Block until irq becomes pending (or perhaps a spurious wakeup) */ + xen_poll_irq(irq); + spin_time_accum_blocked(start); + return 0; +} +PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK(xen_halt_cpu); + +#endif /* CONFIG_QUEUE_SPINLOCK */ + static irqreturn_t dummy_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) { BUG(); @@ -258,7 +373,6 @@ void xen_uninit_lock_cpu(int cpu) per_cpu(irq_name, cpu) = NULL; } - /* * Our init of PV spinlocks is split in two init functions due to us * using paravirt patching and jump labels patching and having to do @@ -275,8 +389,17 @@ voi...
2010 Nov 03
25
[PATCH 00/20] x86: ticket lock rewrite and paravirtualization
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge at citrix.com> Hi all, This series does two major things: 1. It converts the bulk of the implementation to C, and makes the "small ticket" and "large ticket" code common. Only the actual size-dependent asm instructions are specific to the ticket size. The resulting generated asm is very similar to the current
2010 Nov 03
25
[PATCH 00/20] x86: ticket lock rewrite and paravirtualization
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge at citrix.com> Hi all, This series does two major things: 1. It converts the bulk of the implementation to C, and makes the "small ticket" and "large ticket" code common. Only the actual size-dependent asm instructions are specific to the ticket size. The resulting generated asm is very similar to the current
2010 Nov 03
25
[PATCH 00/20] x86: ticket lock rewrite and paravirtualization
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge at citrix.com> Hi all, This series does two major things: 1. It converts the bulk of the implementation to C, and makes the "small ticket" and "large ticket" code common. Only the actual size-dependent asm instructions are specific to the ticket size. The resulting generated asm is very similar to the current
2012 Oct 17
28
Xen PVM: Strange lockups when running PostgreSQL load
I am currently looking at a bug report[1] which is happening when a Xen PVM guest with multiple VCPUs is running a high IO database load (a test script is available in the bug report). In experimenting it seems that this happens (or is getting more likely) when the number of VCPUs is 8 or higher (though I have not tried 6, only 2 and 4), having autogroup enabled seems to make it more likely, too
2010 Nov 16
23
[PATCH 00/14] PV ticket locks without expanding spinlock
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge at citrix.com> Hi all, This is a revised version of the pvticket lock series. The early part of the series is mostly unchanged: it converts the bulk of the ticket lock code into C and makes the "small" and "large" ticket code common. The only changes are the incorporation of various review comments. The latter part of
2010 Nov 16
23
[PATCH 00/14] PV ticket locks without expanding spinlock
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge at citrix.com> Hi all, This is a revised version of the pvticket lock series. The early part of the series is mostly unchanged: it converts the bulk of the ticket lock code into C and makes the "small" and "large" ticket code common. The only changes are the incorporation of various review comments. The latter part of
2010 Nov 16
23
[PATCH 00/14] PV ticket locks without expanding spinlock
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge at citrix.com> Hi all, This is a revised version of the pvticket lock series. The early part of the series is mostly unchanged: it converts the bulk of the ticket lock code into C and makes the "small" and "large" ticket code common. The only changes are the incorporation of various review comments. The latter part of
2012 Mar 21
15
[PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge at citrix.com> Changes since last posting: (Raghavendra K T) [ - Rebased to linux-3.3-rc6. - used function+enum in place of macro (better type checking) - use cmpxchg while resetting zero status for possible race [suggested by Dave Hansen for KVM patches ] ] This series replaces the existing paravirtualized spinlock mechanism with a
2012 Mar 21
15
[PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge at citrix.com> Changes since last posting: (Raghavendra K T) [ - Rebased to linux-3.3-rc6. - used function+enum in place of macro (better type checking) - use cmpxchg while resetting zero status for possible race [suggested by Dave Hansen for KVM patches ] ] This series replaces the existing paravirtualized spinlock mechanism with a
2012 Apr 19
13
[PATCH RFC V7 0/12] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge at citrix.com> This series replaces the existing paravirtualized spinlock mechanism with a paravirtualized ticketlock mechanism. (targeted for 3.5 window) Changes in V7: - Reabsed patches to 3.4-rc3 - Added jumplabel split patch (originally from Andrew Jones rebased to 3.4-rc3 - jumplabel changes from Ingo and Jason taken and now using
2012 Apr 19
13
[PATCH RFC V7 0/12] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge at citrix.com> This series replaces the existing paravirtualized spinlock mechanism with a paravirtualized ticketlock mechanism. (targeted for 3.5 window) Changes in V7: - Reabsed patches to 3.4-rc3 - Added jumplabel split patch (originally from Andrew Jones rebased to 3.4-rc3 - jumplabel changes from Ingo and Jason taken and now using
2013 Aug 06
16
[PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks
This series replaces the existing paravirtualized spinlock mechanism with a paravirtualized ticketlock mechanism. The series provides implementation for both Xen and KVM. The current set of patches are for Xen/x86 spinlock/KVM guest side, to be included against -tip. I 'll be sending a separate patchset for KVM host based on kvm tree. Please note I have added the below performance result
2013 Aug 06
16
[PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks
This series replaces the existing paravirtualized spinlock mechanism with a paravirtualized ticketlock mechanism. The series provides implementation for both Xen and KVM. The current set of patches are for Xen/x86 spinlock/KVM guest side, to be included against -tip. I 'll be sending a separate patchset for KVM host based on kvm tree. Please note I have added the below performance result