search for: dumbest

This is possibly the dumbest question I have asked ever, but how do you set ACLs on files within a ZFS filesystem? Trying to use setfacl(1) diverts me to the acl(5) manpage; well, I know that I need to use NFSv4 style ACLs, but where is the utility to do so? This is on Solaris 10 Update 2. Thanks, Ceri -- That must be won...

Howdy all, This may be the dumbest question in the world, but how can you "add one month" to a Date object? I can''t just add 30 days, because months have varying lengths. Any help would be much appreciated... Thanks! -Neal --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because...

Hi, I get fascinated when I dial someone and get an IVR play " for accounts department press 1, for sales, press 2 or hold the line for an operator" and then have MOH play before the line is picked up at the desired extesion. Please, permit me as I know this will be one of the dumbest questions to ask in a group like this. I'll apprecaite any specific guide/instruction. Thanks in anticipation. Mike --------------------------------- Discover Yahoo! Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news & more. Check it out! -------------- next part -------------- An HTM...

Hi, imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills performance, especially on high latency lines. I wonder: if IMAP servers can effectively handle boundless fetches (like a list with all wanted UIDs, or simply 1:* if all are needed), do you see this as a good addition to develop? This could be a new imapc_f...

Hi, i have a patch to make instiki work with the latest version of ruby : as_clean_logger_rb-fixed.patch But i dont know how to apply it. Any ideas?? Thanks, Chris -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, On 05/04/15 10:59, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 28 Apr 2015, at 23:49, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills performance, especially on high latency lines. >> >> I wonder: if IMAP servers can effectively handle boundless fetches (like a list with all wanted UIDs, or simply 1:* if all are needed), do you see this as a good addition to develop? > Set mail_...

I'm trying to move from Matlab to R, and I'm stuck even getting started. This sounds to me like the dumbest question in the world but... how does one put R source code in files? Over the last three days I've gone front to back through the Introduction to R and the R Language Definition, and while I'm excited that the language is so Lispish, none of what I read described how to write a function, s...

...-----Original Message----- > From: JLB [mailto:jlb@twu.net] > I'd go further and cut down on membership to people emailing from > non-Windows systems (including Webmail systems, until someone > invents a worm that spreads through those...) Okay, I'm sorry, but that's the dumbest idea yet. If they didn't have Windows, why would they use Samba?

Hi, trying to develop this idea of splitting c++ classes into real interface and implementation and to make a std isocpp proposal out of it. Need some help and info to make the proposal cover as many details as possible. The idea is to split the class declaration into a part that will stay in the header and will contain only the public members. (let's ignore protected for the moment). The

...79%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 64208maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+184605minor)pagefaults 0swaps The Cray empty build includes some really horrendous shell script trickery known as "modules." You can read the gory details here: http://modules.sourceforge.net/ It's possibly the dumbest thing ever invented. But that's what I've got to work with. The point is, the Cray build includes some major shell overhead that the LLVM build doesn't have to deal with. And the Cray build has more targets to build. And the Cray build has more dependencies to examine. And the Cray...

Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> writes: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:09 PM, David A. Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: >> Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: >> >>> Okay, we can get rid of recursive make. However, as pointed out >>> elsewhere, removing recursive make will not make a difference on the >>> LLVM build. What

...ze is wrong). At the end of --checksum > you will still have to do the delta xfers that you would do without it. > > OTOH, you are using --dry-run. If you are trying to generate a report > about what files are corrupted then only --checksum an do that. It > will just do it in the dumbest/slowest way possible. > > On 10/28/2015 02:08 AM, Clint Olsen wrote: > > What about -c? It seems I'm getting a lot of spurious file > > transfer candidates when using: > > > > -avvznIi --no-o --no-g --no-p > > > > It's showing transfers (receive) fo...

What about -c? It seems I'm getting a lot of spurious file transfer candidates when using: -avvznIi --no-o --no-g --no-p It's showing transfers (receive) for many files I know haven't been tampered with. Thanks, -Clint On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > That is correct.

...d dead code elimination. The front-end will also do local optimizations on expressions, like optimizing "a+b-b" to "a". There might also be some other small stuff I'm not remembering, but there aren't any other big optimizations happening at -O0. If you really want the dumbest possible conversion into bitcode, you can probably hack up clang (http://clang.llvm.org) to disable all optimizations... clang generally does less optimization, and if there's some particular optimization you want to disable, finding it should be easier. That said, it's probably not worth...

> On Feb 12, 2015, at 8:15 AM, mobi phil <mobi at mobiphil.com> wrote: > > sorry to insist. While I do not beleive the question was the dumbest in the world, would love to know to find out some info, please find belowe the short version of the question: > > Is there already in LLVM or is there any plan to support some mechanism for static/dynamic inline-ing? It is already statically possible at link-time using LTO. I *think* it is...

On 28 Apr 2015, at 23:49, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: > > Hi, > > imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills performance, especially on high latency lines. > > I wonder: if IMAP servers can effectively handle boundless fetches (like a list with all wanted UIDs, or simply 1:* if all are needed), do you see this as a good addition to develop? Set mail_prefetch_co...

...sn.hu> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 05/04/15 10:59, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 28 Apr 2015, at 23:49, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills performance, especially on high latency lines. >>> >>> I wonder: if IMAP servers can effectively handle boundless fetches (like a list with all wanted UIDs, or simply 1:* if all are needed), do you see this as a good addition to develop? >&...

...gt; Hi, >> >> On 05/04/15 10:59, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> On 28 Apr 2015, at 23:49, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills performance, especially on high latency lines. >>>> >>>> I wonder: if IMAP servers can effectively handle boundless fetches (like a list with all wanted UIDs, or simply 1:* if all are needed), do you see this as a good addition to develo...

Hi All, [I originally posted this message in the main CentOS users' list, but later found this list. So, I'm reposting it here since this is where it belongs.] I'm trying to install a Fedora 8 domU on a CentOS 5 dom0, but the following command fails: [root at xenmaster ~]# virt-install -p -n krs -r 512 -m 00:16:3E:66:94:5F -b xenbr0 --vnc --vncport=5910 -l

Any tips on taking a Centos 4 desktop from physical hardware to virtual environment? Ted Miller Indiana, USA