Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "dulwich".
2017 Jul 09
2
Invalid link on Github
...uggestions about how to
improve the description to be less misleading or otherwise improved?
Thanks folks!
~Will
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Anton Korobeynikov
<anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
> We tried to serve both git and gitweb from the same URL, however, it
> seems that Dulwich has a lot of problems under the load /
> compatibility issues. This caused massive problems with git during the
> first day after migration and therefore we decided to roll back to
> "old" scheme, using "stock" git for server.
>
> On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 5:07 AM, W...
2017 Jul 08
2
Invalid link on Github
Hmm. Since the git URL's changed recently I was inclined to believe
this was a simple oversight that needed to be updated.
However, AFAICT the listed URL's are more or less equivalent to the
new ones ("https://git.llvm.org/git/llvm.git") other than printing a
warning about being redirected to the new format.
Neither URL is suited for browsing via http/https, but both work if
2011 Aug 19
0
[LLVMdev] git Status
...;ve a sneaking suspicion from reading Chris Lattner's messages about reviewing patches in a queue that Mercurial's MQ facility would come in handy for that.
<http://hgbook.red-bean.com/read/managing-change-with-mercurial-queues.html>
The good news is that with recent Mercurial and Dulwich versions installed, the Hg-git extension is really quite reasonable, and it allows you to use MQ among your distributed Mercurial clones, and still push to a remote Git repository when you've finished editing a patch. I do this all the time.
One point worth noting about the Hg-git extension i...
2011 Aug 18
5
[LLVMdev] git Status
Did the project ever come to a decision about making a transition to
git? I'm trying to do some longer-term planning and it would be helpful
to know what the roadmap is.
Thanks!
-Dave