search for: dtyp

...IsGuest are set to FALSE and the request is not signed or not encrypted, then the server MUST disconnect the connection. The server MUST parse the Unicode string in the Buffer field, specified by PathOffset and PathLength fields, to extract the hostname and sharename components, as specified in [MS-DTYP] section 2.2.49. If the Buffer field is not in the format specified in section 2.2.9, the server MUST fail the request with STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER. Otherwise, the server MUST provide the tuple <hostname, sharename> parsed from the request message to invoke the event specified in [MS-SRVS] s...

...in 998, eGroupware will assume the UID is 998. The SID shouldn't end in '998', all normal AD users, groups etc start at '1000', it is the Windows 'system' users & groups that start at 500, see here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-dtyp/81d92bba-d22b-4a8c-908a-554ab29148ab Rowland

...s 998. >> The SID shouldn't end in '998', all normal AD users, groups etc start >> at '1000', it is the Windows 'system' users & groups that start at >> 500, see here: >> >> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-dtyp/81d92bba-d22b-4a8c-908a-554ab29148ab >> >> >> Rowland >> >> > The rationale is that not every Samba AD is RFC2307 Compliant. Whilst this is technically correct (you have to specify '--use-rfc2307' when provisioning), all the RFC2307 attributes are standard...

...#39;t end in '998', all normal AD users, groups etc start >>>> at '1000', it is the Windows 'system' users & groups that start at >>>> 500, see here: >>>> >>>> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-dtyp/81d92bba-d22b-4a8c-908a-554ab29148ab >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Rowland >>>> >>>> >>> The rationale is that not every Samba AD is RFC2307 Compliant. >> Whilst this is technically correct (you have to specify >> ...

...machine. > > The question perhaps what Unix users correspond to those BUILTIN users > on unix domain member which correspond to range: > > idmap config * : range = 3000-7999 > I could not find any. Ah, read this: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-dtyp/81d92bba-d22b-4a8c-908a-554ab29148ab > > As on unix domain member I get: > UDM# wbinfo -S S-1-5-32-544 > failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND > Could not convert sid S-1-5-32-544 to uid > I shoud mention that for "oridinary" domain users this commands wo...

...normal AD users, groups etc start >>>>>> at '1000', it is the Windows 'system' users & groups that start at >>>>>> 500, see here: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-dtyp/81d92bba-d22b-4a8c-908a-554ab29148ab >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Rowland >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> The rationale is that not every Samba AD is RFC2307 Compli...

...ssume the UID is 998. > > The SID shouldn't end in '998', all normal AD users, groups etc start > at '1000', it is the Windows 'system' users & groups that start at > 500, see here: > > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-dtyp/81d92bba-d22b-4a8c-908a-554ab29148ab > > > Rowland > > The rationale is that not every Samba AD is RFC2307 Compliant. And you are right, All SIDs start at 1000 and go up, and most of my users have a UID of more than 1000 except for two. Never the less, I've tried the SQL method t...

...t >>>>>>>> at '1000', it is the Windows 'system' users & groups that start at >>>>>>>> 500, see here: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-dtyp/81d92bba-d22b-4a8c-908a-554ab29148ab >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rowland >>>>>>>> >>>>>&gt...

...The SID shouldn't end in '998', all normal AD users, groups etc start >>> at '1000', it is the Windows 'system' users & groups that start at >>> 500, see here: >>> >>> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-dtyp/81d92bba-d22b-4a8c-908a-554ab29148ab >>> >>> >>> >>> Rowland >>> >>> >> The rationale is that not every Samba AD is RFC2307 Compliant. > Whilst this is technically correct (you have to specify > '--use-rfc2307' when provision...

No, i believe that guy is wrong. MS-DTYP https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc980032.aspx NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM S-1-5-18 NT AUTHORITY\authenticated users S-1-5-11 Etc etc. Monday i'll have a look again. Have a nice weeken everybody. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bou...

...9;998', all normal AD users, groups etc start >>>>> at '1000', it is the Windows 'system' users & groups that start at >>>>> 500, see here: >>>>> >>>>> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-dtyp/81d92bba-d22b-4a8c-908a-554ab29148ab >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Rowland >>>>> >>>>> >>>> The rationale is that not every Samba AD is RFC2307 Compliant. >>> Whilst this is...

...gt;>> start >>>>>>> at '1000', it is the Windows 'system' users & groups that start at >>>>>>> 500, see here: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-dtyp/81d92bba-d22b-4a8c-908a-554ab29148ab >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rowland >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>&g...

Hello, There recommended range in Samba4 share for BUILTIN users is usually (from Samba wiki) # Default ID mapping configuration for local BUILTIN accounts # and groups on a domain member. The default (*) domain: # - must not overlap with any domain ID mapping configuration! # - must use a read-write-enabled back end, such as tdb. idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * : range = 3000-7999

On 07/02/2019 06:10 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/07/2019 10:31, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >> I have a Samba problem with eGroupware. Samba 4 is screwing with my >> >> eGroupware UIDs causing Havoc. Samba 4 uses the last four Digits of the >> SID rather than the UID Number. > > If you are running Samba as an AD DC, then Unix UID != RID (what you

Editing the xml.. results in same error. ( which is logical ) The exact event from windows. Eventlog info: Source : Group Policy Scheduled Tasks. ID : 4098 USER : SYSTEM Error code : Group Policy object did not apply because it failed with error code '0x80070534 No mapping between account names and security IDs was done.' This error was suppressed. So I'll wait until this

...yton <jlayton at samba.org> Date: Wed Nov 7 10:19:18 2012 -0500 getcifsacl: fix raw SID printing routine The current routine prints multiple authority values as different numbers instead of combining them, which is wrong. Print the SID according to the rules in MS-DTYP. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton at samba.org> commit 786725279edf0a3ab684e68743e56c1412d95c59 Author: Jeff Layton <jlayton at samba.org> Date: Wed Nov 7 10:19:18 2012 -0500 setcifsacl: consolidate SID copying routines ...instead of open-coding it thrice....