Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "dtor_action".
Did you mean:
do_action
2004 Oct 06
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Starting with LLVM-GCC on Cygwin
...undeclared name is deprecated)
pfmeter.h:621: error: there are no arguments to `check_state_clock' that
depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of `check_state_clock'
must be available
and (with -fpermissive):
pfmeter2.h: In member function `void ClassPerfoMeter<T1, T2,
T3>::dtor_action() const':
pfmeter2.h:832: error: `end_resource_value_' undeclared (first use this
function)
...
In any case, our test suite works best with individual programs that do
one thing, then exit (like the fib program), so perfmeter isn't directly
useful. It's a neat suite though, thanks...
2004 Oct 06
1
[LLVMdev] Re: Starting with LLVM-GCC on Cygwin
...; pfmeter.h:621: error: there are no arguments to `check_state_clock' that
> depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of `check_state_clock'
> must be available
>
> and (with -fpermissive):
> pfmeter2.h: In member function `void ClassPerfoMeter<T1, T2,
> T3>::dtor_action() const':
> pfmeter2.h:832: error: `end_resource_value_' undeclared (first use this
> function)
> ...
>
> In any case, our test suite works best with individual programs that do
> one thing, then exit (like the fib program), so perfmeter isn't directly
> useful. It...
2004 Oct 06
3
[LLVMdev] Re: Starting with LLVM-GCC on Cygwin
"Chris Lattner" <sabre at nondot.org> wrote in message news:Pine.LNX.4.44.0410051204480.5863-100000 at nondot.org...
> On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Alex Vinokur wrote:
>
> > I would like to use LLVM-GCC to compare its performance with other compilers.
> > Something like testsuite "Computing very large Fibonacci numbers" at
> >