search for: dtls_test

...several test cases started failing that deal with dynamic thread local storage. Failing Tests (3): LeakSanitizer-AddressSanitizer-powerpc64 :: TestCases/Linux/use_tls_dynamic.cc LeakSanitizer-Standalone-powerpc64 :: TestCases/Linux/use_tls_dynamic.cc MemorySanitizer-POWERPC64 :: dtls_test.c I looked at dtls_test.c in detail ******************** TEST 'MemorySanitizer-POWERPC64 :: dtls_test.c' FAILED ******************** Script: -- /home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/./bin/clang -fsanitize=memory -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-c...

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 04:48:51PM +0200, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev wrote: > [ CCed all people who were involved in this thread ] > > Hi Tom, > > personally, I am interested to test the prebuilt-toolchains for > Ubuntu/xenial alias 16.04 LTS and Debian/Jessie v8.5.0 AMD64. > The available toolchains are incomplete and thus useless. > > Just as a fact: There is still no

...TestCases/use_registers.cc LeakSanitizer-Standalone :: TestCases/swapcontext.cc LeakSanitizer-Standalone :: TestCases/use_registers.cc MemorySanitizer :: Linux/process_vm_readv.cc MemorySanitizer :: allocator_mapping.cc MemorySanitizer :: dlerror.cc MemorySanitizer :: dtls_test.c MemorySanitizer :: memcmp_test.cc MemorySanitizer :: msan_print_shadow3.cc MemorySanitizer :: param_tls_limit.cc MemorySanitizer :: unaligned_read_origin.cc MemorySanitizer-Unit :: Msan-mips64-Test/MemorySanitizer.SmallPreAllocatedStackThread MemorySanitizer-Unit ::...

Dear testers, Release Candidate 3 has just been tagged [1]. Please build, test, and upload to the sftp. If there are no regressions from previous release candidates, this will be the last release candidate before the final release. Release notes can still go into the branch. Thanks again for all your work! Hans [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-branch-commits/2016-February/009866.html

Hi David, Chandler, I see lldb tests hang often, and then I kill the dotest process. I'd like to stop running check-all too, but I feel it's important when I modify FileCheck. The flakiness that Chandler mentioned makes it time-consuming to verify test results. Joel On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 4:41 PM Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > What

...TestCases/swapcontext.cc > LeakSanitizer-Standalone :: TestCases/use_registers.cc > MemorySanitizer :: Linux/process_vm_readv.cc > MemorySanitizer :: allocator_mapping.cc > MemorySanitizer :: dlerror.cc > MemorySanitizer :: dtls_test.c > MemorySanitizer :: memcmp_test.cc > MemorySanitizer :: msan_print_shadow3.cc > MemorySanitizer :: param_tls_limit.cc > MemorySanitizer :: unaligned_read_origin.cc > MemorySanitizer-Unit :: Msan-mips64-Test/MemorySanitize...

Hi, I have just tagged 3.7.1-rc1, so it is ready for testing. As a reminder, when doing regression testing, use the 3.7.0 release as your baseline. Thanks, Tom

Hi, I've just tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc3. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. This will be the last release candidate unless there is a major problem. I'm planning to tag the final release on Dec 19. -Tom

Hi, I've tagged the LLVM 9.0.1-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and upload binaries. I've also updated the test-release.sh script to pull from GitHub instead of SVN, if you run into any issues with the new script, let me know. -Tom

Hi, I've just tagged the 9.0.1-final release. Testers can begin uploading binaries. -Tom

Hi, I've tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc2. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. If all goes well, this will be the last -rc. -Tom

Hello everyone, 9.0.0-rc2 was tagged yesterday from the release_90 branch at r368683. In the Git monorepo it's available as the llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2 tag. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc2 Binaries will be added as they become available. The tag went in roughly one week behind schedule (see "Upcoming Releases" at https://llvm.org), but

Hi everyone, 9.0.0-rc1 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r367217 (tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1 in the Git monorepo). Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc1 Binaries will be added as they become available. Please file bug reports for any issues you find as blockers of https://llvm.org/PR42474 Release testers: please start your engines, run the

Hello everyone, 9.0.0-rc5 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r371837. In the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc5 Binaries will be added as they become available. There is only a single change from rc4 to rc5. Once more, the hope is that this will be the last release candidate and that we can

Hello again, 9.0.0-rc4 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r371490. In the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc4 Binaries will be added as they become available. There are not a lot of changes from rc3 to rc4, and there are again no open release blockers, so I'm hoping this will be the last

Hello everyone, 9.0.0-rc3 was tagged today from the release_90 branch at r370450. In the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc3 Binaries will be added as they become available. There are currently no open release blockers, which means if nothing new comes up, the final release could ship soon and this is

Hello everyone, 9.0.0-rc6 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r372100. In the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc6 This is the same as rc5 plus one very minor change (r371969) that still seemed good to pick up. I'm not allocating extra time for testing this one, expecting to tag