Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "dtdc04".
Did you mean:
dtdc03
2016 Dec 04
2
port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
...cross-ncs objectguid
>> # record 1
>> dn: CN=NTDS
>> Settings,CN=DTDC03,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=dtshrm,DC=dt
>> objectGUID: d3298cdc-aed1-48e6-b8fc-f3cdb80b1066
>>
>> # record 2
>> dn: CN=NTDS
>> Settings,CN=DTDC04,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=dtshrm,DC=dt
>> objectGUID: aa03011a-94c2-4c52-bc60-6fd2f75d35e5
>>
>> # returned 2 records
>> # 2 entries
>> # 0 referrals
>>
>> And then ran:
>>
>> root at dtdc03:~# host...
2016 Dec 04
2
port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
...search -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb
'(invocationId=*)' --cross-ncs objectguid
# record 1
dn: CN=NTDS
Settings,CN=DTDC03,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=dtshrm,DC=dt
objectGUID: d3298cdc-aed1-48e6-b8fc-f3cdb80b1066
# record 2
dn: CN=NTDS
Settings,CN=DTDC04,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=dtshrm,DC=dt
objectGUID: aa03011a-94c2-4c52-bc60-6fd2f75d35e5
# returned 2 records
# 2 entries
# 0 referrals
And then ran:
root at dtdc03:~# host -t CNAME
aa03011a-94c2-4c52-bc60-6fd2f75d35e5._msdcs.dtshrm.dt.
aa03011a-94c2-4c5...
2016 Dec 04
1
port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
...t; '(invocationId=*)' --cross-ncs objectguid
> # record 1
> dn: CN=NTDS
> Settings,CN=DTDC03,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=dtshrm,DC=dt
> objectGUID: d3298cdc-aed1-48e6-b8fc-f3cdb80b1066
>
> # record 2
> dn: CN=NTDS
> Settings,CN=DTDC04,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=dtshrm,DC=dt
> objectGUID: aa03011a-94c2-4c52-bc60-6fd2f75d35e5
>
> # returned 2 records
> # 2 entries
> # 0 referrals
>
> And then ran:
>
> root at dtdc03:~# host -t CNAME
> aa03011a-94c2-4c52-bc6...
2016 Dec 04
0
port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
...ord 1
> >> dn: CN=NTDS
> >> Settings,CN=DTDC03,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=dtshrm,DC=dt
> >> objectGUID: d3298cdc-aed1-48e6-b8fc-f3cdb80b1066
> >>
> >> # record 2
> >> dn: CN=NTDS
> >> Settings,CN=DTDC04,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=dtshrm,DC=dt
> >> objectGUID: aa03011a-94c2-4c52-bc60-6fd2f75d35e5
> >>
> >> # returned 2 records
> >> # 2 entries
> >> # 0 referrals
> >>
> >> And then ran:
> &g...
2016 Nov 19
0
db check fails
...have run Louis' script to check the database. The error email has many
"ldapcmp FAILED" entries like this:
Comparing:
'CN=Test 5. User,OU=dtusers,OU=dtobjects,DC=dtshrm,DC=dt'
[ldap://dtdc03.dtshrm.dt]
'CN=Test 5. User,OU=dtusers,OU=dtobjects,DC=dtshrm,DC=dt'
[ldap://dtdc04.dtshrm.dt.] <<< period (.)
Attributes found only in ldap://dtdc03.dtshrm.dt:
CN <<< CAPS
Attributes found only in ldap://dtdc04.dtshrm.dt.: <<< period (.)
cn <<< small case
FAILED
The only difference I can find that happens...
2016 Nov 18
2
db check fails
On 2016-11-18 13:01, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> Am 18.11.2016 um 18:41 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba:
>
>> Louis,
>>
>> I ran your db check script against my newer DC's and it is failing.
>>
>> Searched the samba wiki and not finding resolution easily.
>
> If this is a script that is not provided by Samba,
2016 Dec 04
0
port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
...t; '(invocationId=*)' --cross-ncs objectguid
> # record 1
> dn: CN=NTDS
> Settings,CN=DTDC03,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=dtshrm,DC=dt
> objectGUID: d3298cdc-aed1-48e6-b8fc-f3cdb80b1066
>
> # record 2
> dn: CN=NTDS
> Settings,CN=DTDC04,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=dtshrm,DC=dt
> objectGUID: aa03011a-94c2-4c52-bc60-6fd2f75d35e5
>
> # returned 2 records
> # 2 entries
> # 0 referrals
>
> And then ran:
>
> root at dtdc03:~# host -t CNAME
> aa03011a-94c2-4c52-bc6...
2016 Nov 21
2
db check fails
...Site name = Default-First-Site-Name (samba-tool
fsmo show)
The Default Naming Context = DC=dtshrm,DC=dt (samba-tool fsmo
show)
The Kerberos REALM name used = DTSHRM.DT (kinit and /etc/krb5.conf
and resolving)
The Ipadres of DC dtdc03.dtshrm.dt = 192.168.16.49
The Ipadres of DC dtdc04.dtshrm.dt = 192.168.16.50
I keep ignoring that "lmhost" complaint . . . should I?
--
_______________________________
Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy
2016 Nov 21
0
db check fails
...-Name
> (samba-tool fsmo show)
> The Default Naming Context = DC=dtshrm,DC=dt (samba-tool fsmo
> show)
> The Kerberos REALM name used = DTSHRM.DT (kinit and /etc/krb5.conf
> and resolving)
> The Ipadres of DC dtdc03.dtshrm.dt = 192.168.16.49
> The Ipadres of DC dtdc04.dtshrm.dt = 192.168.16.50
>
> I keep ignoring that "lmhost" complaint . . . should I?
>
Yes
Rowland
2016 Nov 19
5
db check fails
On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 08:14:58 -0600
Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On 2016-11-19 07:54, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 07:03:22 -0600
> > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 2016-11-18 13:19, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote:
> >
>
2016 Nov 04
1
debugging bind9_DLZ
On 2016-11-04 12:43, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 12:29:42 -0500
> Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> On 2016-11-04 12:07, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>
> On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 11:49:16 -0500
> Bob of Donelson Trophy <bob at donelsontrophy.net> wrote:
>
> On 2016-11-04 11:31, Rowland Penny via