search for: dt_relrzent

...ouches so many different pieces from the linker, elf tools, and > the dynamic loader. Specifically, we need agreement and/or guidance on where > and how should the new section type and its encoding be documented. We're > proposing adding new defines for SHT_RELRZ, DT_RELRZ, DT_RELRZSZ, DT_RELRZENT, > and DT_RELRZCOUNT that all the different parts of the toolchains can agree on. Yes, as Ian mentioned, the generic ABI discussion is at generic-abi at googlegroups.com. Most people who would be interested are already on the gnu-gabi at sourceware.org list, but there are a few who are not, and...

+llvm-dev Discussion here: https://sourceware.org/ml/gnu-gabi/2017-q2/msg00000.html On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Suprateeka R Hegde <hegdesmailbox at gmail.com> wrote: > On 02-May-2017 12:05 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> On 05/01/2017 08:28 PM, Suprateeka R Hegde wrote: >>> So the ratio shows ~96% is RELATIVE reloc. And only ~4% others. This is >>> not the

...e before that touches so many different pieces from the linker, elf tools, and the dynamic loader. Specifically, we need agreement and/or guidance on where and how should the new section type and its encoding be documented. We're proposing adding new defines for SHT_RELRZ, DT_RELRZ, DT_RELRZSZ, DT_RELRZENT, and DT_RELRZCOUNT that all the different parts of the toolchains can agree on. Thanks, Rahul [1]: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/users/ccoutant/experimental-relr On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram at google.com> wr...