Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "dst_column".
Did you mean:
dst_columns
2012 Dec 03
2
[LLVMdev] Which transform passes to apply?
...fine void @jitcv_sum_64sf1001(%Matrix* %src, %Matrix* %dst, i32 %len) {
entry:
br label %loop_i
loop_i: ; preds = %loop_i_end,
%entry
%i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %increment_i, %loop_i_end ]
%0 = getelementptr inbounds %Matrix* %dst, i32 0, i32 2
%dst_columns = load i32* %0
*%dst_yRem = urem i32 %i, %dst_columns
%dst_y = urem i32 %i, %dst_columns
%1 = sub i32 %i, %dst_y
%2 = add i32 %1, %dst_yRem*
%3 = getelementptr inbounds %Matrix* %src, i32 0, i32 0
%4 = load i8** %3
%src_data = bitcast i8* %4 to double*
%5 = getelementptr double* %s...
2012 Dec 04
0
[LLVMdev] Which transform passes to apply?
...osh,
On 03/12/12 02:58, Josh Klontz wrote:
> Hello, I'm a new LLVM user working on a C++ EDSL for image processing. I have
> a function, which after applying createInstructionCombiningPass() and
> createDeadCodeEliminationPass() looks like:
>
...
> *%dst_yRem = urem i32 %i, %dst_columns
> %dst_y = urem i32 %i, %dst_columns
> %1 = sub i32 %i, %dst_y
> %2 = add i32 %1, %dst_yRem*
...
> My question is which optimization pass(es) are needed to simplify the
> instructions in bold. I've tried running the same passes again and also
> tried createInstructi...