Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "dsec".
Did you mean:
desc
2002 Sep 25
0
vorbisfile bug?
Good day.
It seems vorbisfile has a bug.
There is a such string in ov_time_seek:
ogg_int64_t target=pcm_total+(seconds-time_total)*vf->vi[link].rate;
It is not accounted type convertion between double and ogg_int64_t.
E.g. if I convert 440267'th sample (44100Hz source) to time:
double dSec = 440267 / (double) 44100;
and then try to seek dSec:
ov_time_seek(pOVFile, dSec);
the resulting offset will be 440266'th sample, because of
dSec*44100 gives 440266.999999997...
Probably the line
ogg_int64_t target=pcm_total+(seconds-time_total)*vf->vi[link].rate;
should be replaced with som...
2012 Jan 31
26
[PATCH 00/10] FLASK updates: MSI interrupts, cleanups
This patch set adds XSM security labels to useful debugging output
locations, and fixes some assumptions that all interrupts behaved like
GSI interrupts (which had useful non-dynamic IDs). It also cleans up the
policy build process and adds an example of how to use the user field in
the security context.
Debug output:
[PATCH 01/10] xsm: Add security labels to event-channel dump
[PATCH 02/10] xsm:
2001 Sep 04
10
Newsgroup - another try?
As nobody seems to answer my request, I simply post it again.
Is there any reason why the r-help-mailinglist should not be converted to a
newsgroup?
These were the advantages of a newsgroup I mentioned earlier:
-) you can easily search the archives
-) the discussion is faster (I experience that the R-mailinglist has a lag
of about 1 to 2 hours (not for everyone!!!). When I ask a question, I get
2005 Jan 04
11
ESFQ?
Hi again,
I was just looking around for ESFQ sources, and I see that the main site
is down, and only has kernel 2.6.4 patches.
Is ESFQ maintained? If so, where can I find patches for 2.6.10?
Thanks,
-justin
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/