Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ds_string".
Did you mean:
d_string
2012 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] Handling of unsafe functions
...k that it would be useful if you used the output of your static
analyzer to provide a list of the places where C-style string
manipulation is being done, so that these places can be migrated to
using modern, safe LLVM interfaces for these operations.
[1] http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#ds_string
--Sean Silva
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Martinez, Javier E
<javier.e.martinez at intel.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> We have identified functions in LLVM sources using a static code analyzer
> which are marked as a “security vulnerability”[1][2]. There has been work
&...
2012 Sep 20
1
[LLVMdev] Handling of unsafe functions
...k that it would be useful if you used the output of your static analyzer to provide a list of the places where C-style string manipulation is being done, so that these places can be migrated to using modern, safe LLVM interfaces for these operations.
[1] http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#ds_string
--Sean Silva
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Martinez, Javier E <javier.e.martinez at intel.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> We have identified functions in LLVM sources using a static code
> analyzer which are marked as a "security vulnerability"[1][2]. There
>...
2012 Sep 19
7
[LLVMdev] Handling of unsafe functions
Hello,
We have identified functions in LLVM sources using a static code analyzer which are marked as a "security vulnerability"[1][2]. There has been work already done to address some of them for Linux (e.g. snprintf). We are attempting to solve this issue in a comprehensive fashion across all platforms. Most of the functions identified are for manipulating strings. Memcpy is the most