search for: drsalist

You could probably use CIFS, NFS or sshfs.  It wouldn't be as fast, but the memory requirements should be less. Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: John Long <codeblue at inbox.lv> </div><div>Date:2016/03/25 04:10 (GMT-08:00) </div><div>To: rsync at lists.samba.org

...out problems. Problem is I can't test the connection that much because the connection has been established by a third party and it is just some vlan without any hops. But thanks for the link to the nfs-test that looks interesting! -----Original Message----- From: Dan Stromberg [mailto:drsalists at gmail.com] Sent: donderdag 29 maart 2018 4:36 To: Marc Roos Cc: rsync Subject: Re: Rsync between 2 datacenters not working If reducing the MTU is helping, you might look into turning on Path MTU Discovery. NFS can be fast for large transfers if you tune it. http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~st...

You could try using an automounter, like autofs, in combination with sshfs. It'll be slower, possibly a lot slower, but it should be more reliable over an unreliable connection. I've been using: remote -fstype=fuse,allow_other,nodev,noatime,reconnect,ServerAliveInterval=15,ServerAliveCountMax=40,uid=0,gid=0,ro,nodev,noatime :sshfs\#root at remote.host.com\:/ BTW, I'm not sure

If reducing the MTU is helping, you might look into turning on Path MTU Discovery. NFS can be fast for large transfers if you tune it. http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/nfs-test.html NFS is not terribly secure though - at least v2 and v3 weren't. Not sure about v4. On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:59 AM, Marc Roos via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Kevin, Dan,