Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches for "drop3".
Did you mean:
drop
2015 May 27
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal: change LNT’s regression detection algorithm and how it is used to reduce false positives
Update: in that same block of 10,000 LLVM/Clang revisions, this the number
of distinct SHA1 hashes for the binaries of the following benchmarks:
7 MultiSource/Applications/aha/aha
2 MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/drop3/drop3
10 MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11
7 MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uudecode/uudecode
3 MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uuencode/uuencode
5 MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-rc4/rc4
11 SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/n-body
2 SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ackermann...
2015 May 27
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal: change LNT’s regression detection algorithm and how it is used to reduce false positives
...:05 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Update: in that same block of 10,000 LLVM/Clang revisions, this the number of distinct SHA1 hashes for the binaries of the following benchmarks:
>
> 7 MultiSource/Applications/aha/aha
> 2 MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/drop3/drop3
> 10 MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11
> 7 MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uudecode/uudecode
> 3 MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uuencode/uuencode
> 5 MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-rc4/rc4
> 11 SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/n-body
> 2 SingleSource/B...
2011 Apr 30
2
[LLVMdev] Greedy register allocation
...lencod
+6.7% External/SPEC/CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa
+7.4% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-pc1/enc-pc1
+8.2% MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2
+10.7% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall
+12.5% SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft
+14.6% MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/drop3/drop3
Targeting x86-64 PIC -O2:
-40.0% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Queens
-35.7% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops
-24.2% SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build2
-23.1% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/tsp/tsp
-19.4% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm
-18.2% SingleSource/Bench...
2013 Sep 08
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Compile-time and Execution-time analysis for the SCEV canonicalization
...usan30.00%
as well as many execution-time improvements such as:
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ary3-28.98%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog/dynprog-26.97%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/lpbench-25.84%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/drop3/drop3-16.58%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2/yacr2-16.46%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt-14.96%
I think the execution-time performance regression is mainly because of the unexpected performance improvements from non-SCEV canonicalization as shown int eh...
2015 May 19
5
[LLVMdev] Proposal: change LNT’s regression detection algorithm and how it is used to reduce false positives
The reruns flag already does that. It helps a bit, but only as long as the the benchmark is flagged as regressed.
> On May 18, 2015, at 8:28 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Mikhail Zolotukhin <mzolotukhin at apple.com <mailto:mzolotukhin at apple.com>> wrote:
> Hi Chris and others!
>
> I
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...rce/Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/8b10b/8b10b | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11 | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/drop3/drop3 | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uuencode/uuencode | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uudecode/uudecode | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000...
2013 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] IR Passes and TargetTransformInfo: Straw Man
...1.11372255755568
Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl/Equivalen 1.3717 1.3881 1.19559670481884
Benchmarks/Olden/bh/bh 0.6255 0.633 1.1990407673861
Benchmarks/VersaBench/8b10b/8b10b 2.8968 2.9416 1.5465341066004
Benchmarks/BitBench/drop3/drop3 0.174 0.1768 1.60919540229886
Benchmarks/McCat/12-IOtest/iotest 0.1223 0.1243 1.63532297628781
Applications/spiff/spiff 1.629 1.6558 1.6451810926949
Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-flt/Cros 2.0682 2.1028...
2013 Jul 18
3
[LLVMdev] IR Passes and TargetTransformInfo: Straw Man
Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got
chance to list a detailed pass order
for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations.
This is wish-list in our mind:
pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or
just inline tiny func), get rid of
all loop xforms...
post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only
2018 Apr 26
0
Compare test-suite benchmarks performance complied without TBAA, with default TBAA and with new TBAA struct path
...9|2.943005397| -0.03|26934039124| 0|2.942780883| -0.03|26934039124| 0|
|MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/IRSmk/IRSmk.test | 40|2.212075899| 8974161060|2.208563573| 0.16| 8974289110| 0| 2.20958891| 0.11| 8974289109| 0|
|MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/drop3/drop3.test | 169|0.165502473| 1989074268|0.165868692| -0.22| 1989074282| 0|0.166100023| -0.36| 1989074282| 0|
|MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11.test | 40|1.108902765|11578404923|1.108417771| 0.04|11578404923| 0|1...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...8.77 | 1.01 1.02 n/a n/a
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/IRSmk/IRSmk |
> 0.0100 5600 0.0300 * 0.0300 | 0.00 0.00
> 0.00 * 0.04 | - - n/a n/a
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/drop3/drop3 |
> 0.0200 3592 0.0199 * 0.0200 | 0.48 0.66
> 0.46 * 0.49 | 0.73 1.04 n/a n/a
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11 |
> 0.0000 2768 0.0100 * ...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...1.02 n/a n/a
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/IRSmk/
> IRSmk | 0.0100 5600 0.0300
> * 0.0300 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 *
> 0.04 | - - n/a n/a
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/drop3/
> drop3 | 0.0200 3592 0.0199
> * 0.0200 | 0.48 0.66 0.46 *
> 0.49 | 0.73 1.04 n/a n/a
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/
> five11 | 0.0000 2768 0.0...
2011 Dec 01
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
...> 1.29% 0.0464 0.0470 0.0002
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib.compile
> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.SingleSource%2FBenchmarks%2FMisc-C%2B%2B%2Fbigfib.compile=on>
> 1.29% 0.6122 0.6201 0.0006
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/drop3/drop3.compile
> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.MultiSource%2FBenchmarks%2FBitBench%2Fdrop3%2Fdrop3.compile=on>
> 1.27% 0.0706 0.0715 0.0001
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/n-body.compile
> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple...
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers,
2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
To test llvm-gcc:
1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
2) Run make check,
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...ll 2 34437 0 0.01 34407 0 0.01 34407
dot.ll 1 1874 0 0.01 1845 0 0.01 1845
doublecheck.ll 1 32093 0 0.01 32060 0 0.01 32060
dp_dec.ll 2 62131 0 0.02 62108 0 0.02 62108
dp_enc.ll 4 65607 0 0.01 65584 0 0.02 65584
draw_line.ll 1 1792 0 0.01 1763 0 0.01 1763
driver.ll 3 14850 0 0.01 14823 0 0.01 14823
drop3.ll 3 32092 0 0.01 32068 0 0.01 32068
dry.ll 13 30290 0 0.01 30270 0 0.01 30270
dt.ll 2 7389 0 0.01 7374 0 0.01 7374
DuffsDevice.ll 2 9522 0 0.01 9510 0 0.01 9510
dummy.ll 1 2092 0 0.01 2064 0 0.01 2064
DummyOutStream.ll 6 13577 0 0.01 13537 0 0.01 13537
dump.ll 5 25664 0 0.01 25633 0 0.01 25633
dur...