Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "drm_qxl_execbuff".
Did you mean:
drm_qxl_execbuffer
2016 Apr 21
0
[PATCH 14/24] drm/qxl: remove XXX comment from the UAPI header
...eletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/qxl_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/qxl_drm.h
index cd99da0..7eef422 100644
--- a/include/uapi/drm/qxl_drm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/drm/qxl_drm.h
@@ -88,7 +88,6 @@ struct drm_qxl_command {
__u32 pad;
};
-/* XXX: call it drm_qxl_commands? */
struct drm_qxl_execbuffer {
__u32 flags; /* for future use */
__u32 commands_num;
--
2.6.2
2020 Apr 15
1
[PATCH 27/59] drm/qxl: Don't use drm_device->dev_private
...->handle,
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static int qxl_process_single_command(struct qxl_device *qdev,
static int qxl_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
struct drm_file *file_priv)
{
- struct qxl_device *qdev = dev->dev_private;
+ struct qxl_device *qdev = to_qxl(dev);
struct drm_qxl_execbuffer *execbuffer = data;
struct drm_qxl_command user_cmd;
int cmd_num;
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int qxl_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
static int qxl_update_area_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
struct drm_file *file)
{
- struct qxl_device *qdev = dev->d...
2020 Apr 03
1
[PATCH 31/44] drm/qxl: Don't use drm_device->dev_private
...->handle,
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static int qxl_process_single_command(struct qxl_device *qdev,
static int qxl_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
struct drm_file *file_priv)
{
- struct qxl_device *qdev = dev->dev_private;
+ struct qxl_device *qdev = to_qxl(dev);
struct drm_qxl_execbuffer *execbuffer = data;
struct drm_qxl_command user_cmd;
int cmd_num;
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int qxl_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
static int qxl_update_area_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
struct drm_file *file)
{
- struct qxl_device *qdev = dev->d...
2016 Apr 21
25
[PATCH 00/24] drm: add extern C guard for the UAPI headers
Hi all,
As some of you may know there some subtle distinction between C and C++
structs, thus one should wrap/annotate them roughly like below.
...
#if defined(__cplusplus)
extern "C" {
#endif
struct foo {
int bar;
...
};
...
#if defined(__cplusplus)
}
#endif
In order to work around the lack of these users can wrap the header
inclusion in the same way. For example: