search for: drm_properti

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> drm_property_add_enum() can calculate the index itself just fine, so no point in having the caller pass it in. Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson at gmail.com> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> ---

Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com> Best Regards, Lisovskiy Stanislav Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo ________________________________________ From: Intel-gfx [intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] on behalf of Lisovskiy, Stanislav [stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 4:59 PM

Acked-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com> Best Regards, Lisovskiy Stanislav Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo> ________________________________________ From: Ville Syrjala [ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 9:04 PM To: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org Cc: intel-gfx at

On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 12:23:29PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > @@ -924,6 +978,29 @@ struct drm_connector { > */ > struct drm_property_blob *path_blob_ptr; > > + /** > + * @underscan_mode_property: Optional connector underscan mode. Used by > + * the driver to scale the output image and compensate an overscan done > + * on the display side. > + */ > +

Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at bootlin.com> writes: > On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 16:40:11 +0200 > Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 12:23:29PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: >> > @@ -924,6 +978,29 @@ struct drm_connector { >> > */ >> > struct drm_property_blob *path_blob_ptr; >> >

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:44:32PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > We have 3 drivers defining the "underscan", "underscan hborder" and > "underscan vborder" properties (radeon, amd and nouveau) and we are > about to add the same kind of thing in VC4. > > Define generic underscan props and add new fields to the drm_connector > state so that the

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:48 AM, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> > > Replace the ad-hoc iturbt_709 property with the new standard > COLOR_ENCODING property. Compiles, but not tested. > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> > Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Ben

Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- This has received light testing on NV18 and NV34 cards, using the modetest tool. Userspace support to use this for xv is not yet ready. I decided against creating a new "pvideo" engine -- that just seems way too heavy-handed compared to the ~10 lines of code in disp/nv04.c to deal with the PVIDEO interrupts. Even though

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> Replace the ad-hoc iturbt_709 property with the new standard COLOR_ENCODING property. Compiles, but not tested. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at

Hello, This is an attempt at providing generic support for underscan connector props. We already have 3 drivers defining the same underscan, underscan vborder and underscan hborder properties (amd, radeon and nouveau) and I am about to add a new one, hence my proposal to put the prop parsing code in the core and add ->underscan fields to drm_connector_state. Note that I use this new

Hello, This is an attempt at providing generic support for underscan connector props. We already have 3 drivers defining the same underscan, underscan vborder and underscan hborder properties (amd, radeon and nouveau) and I am about to add a new one, hence my proposal to put the prop parsing code in the core and add ->underscan fields to drm_connector_state. In this v2, I also converted the

On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 16:40:11 +0200 Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 12:23:29PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > @@ -924,6 +978,29 @@ struct drm_connector { > > */ > > struct drm_property_blob *path_blob_ptr; > > > > + /** > > + * @underscan_mode_property: Optional connector underscan mode. Used

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 05:15:33PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:44:32PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > We have 3 drivers defining the "underscan", "underscan hborder" and > > "underscan vborder" properties (radeon, amd and nouveau) and we are > > about to add the same kind of thing in VC4. > > > > Define

It's dead code because this is now handled in the core. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com> Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org> Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie> Cc: Ben

Hello, This is an attempt at providing generic support for underscan connector props. We already have 3 drivers defining the same underscan, underscan vborder and underscan hborder properties (amd, radeon and nouveau) and I am about to add a new one, hence my proposal to put the prop parsing code in the core and add ->underscan fields to drm_connector_state. This v3 was based on the "VC4

It's dead code, the core handles all this directly now. This also allows us to unexport drm_atomic_helper_connector_set_property. The only special case is nouveau which used one function for both pre-nv50 legacy modeset code and post-nv50 atomic world instead of 2 vtables. But amounts to exactly the same. What is rather strange here is how few drivers set this up, I suspect the earlier patch

It's dead code, the core handles all this directly now. This also allows us to unexport drm_atomic_helper_plane_set_property. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau at arm.com> Cc: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey at arm.com> Cc: Mali DP Maintainers <malidp at foss.arm.com> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at

We have 3 drivers defining the "underscan", "underscan hborder" and "underscan vborder" properties (radeon, amd and nouveau) and we are about to add the same kind of thing in VC4. Define generic underscan props and add new fields to the drm_connector state so that the property parsing logic can be shared by all DRM drivers. A driver can now attach underscan

We have 3 drivers defining the "underscan", "underscan hborder" and "underscan vborder" properties (radeon, amd and nouveau) and we are about to add the same kind of thing in VC4. Define generic underscan props and add new fields to the drm_connector state so that the property parsing logic can be shared by all DRM drivers. A driver can now attach underscan

Hi Boris, Just because I happened to read the docs in here, one typo below: On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 12:23:29PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: >We have 3 drivers defining the "underscan", "underscan hborder" and >"underscan vborder" properties (radeon, amd and nouveau) and we are >about to add the same kind of thing in VC4. > >Define generic underscan