search for: drm_object_attach_property

...device, 0, "iturbt_709", 0, 1); + if (!plane->props.colorkey || + !plane->props.contrast || + !plane->props.brightness || + !plane->props.hue || + !plane->props.saturation || + !plane->props.iturbt_709) + goto cleanup; + + plane->colorkey = 0; + drm_object_attach_property(&plane->base.base, + plane->props.colorkey, plane->colorkey); + + plane->contrast = 0x1000; + drm_object_attach_property(&plane->base.base, + plane->props.contrast, plane->contrast); + + plane->brightness = 512; + drm_object_attach_property(&plane-&gt...

...t; + connector->underscan_hborder_property = prop; > + > + prop = drm_property_create_range(dev, 0, "underscan vborder", 0, > + max_vborder); > + if (!prop) > + goto err_free_hborder_prop; > + > + connector->underscan_vborder_property = prop; > + > + drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, > + connector->underscan_mode_property, > + DRM_UNDERSCAN_OFF); > + drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, > + connector->underscan_hborder_property, 0); > + drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, > +...

Hello, This is an attempt at providing generic support for underscan connector props. We already have 3 drivers defining the same underscan, underscan vborder and underscan hborder properties (amd, radeon and nouveau) and I am about to add a new one, hence my proposal to put the prop parsing code in the core and add ->underscan fields to drm_connector_state. Note that I use this new

....contrast || !plane->props.brightness || !plane->props.hue || - !plane->props.saturation || - !plane->props.iturbt_709) + !plane->props.saturation) goto cleanup; plane->colorkey = 0; @@ -343,9 +339,13 @@ nv10_overlay_init(struct drm_device *device) drm_object_attach_property(&plane->base.base, plane->props.saturation, plane->saturation); - plane->iturbt_709 = 0; - drm_object_attach_property(&plane->base.base, - plane->props.iturbt_709, plane->iturbt_709); + plane->color_encoding = DRM_COLOR_YCBCR_BT601; + drm_plane_create...

...properties(&mstc->connector); - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mstm->msto) && mstm->msto; i++) + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mstm->msto) && mstm->msto[i]; i++) drm_mode_connector_attach_encoder(&mstc->connector, &mstm->msto[i]->encoder); drm_object_attach_property(&mstc->connector.base, dev->mode_config.path_property, 0); -- 2.11.0

...ECTOR_TV_3: - nv_connector->scaling_mode = DRM_MODE_SCALE_NONE; break; default: - nv_connector->scaling_mode = DRM_MODE_SCALE_FULLSCREEN; + if (type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_LVDS || + type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP) + nv_connector->scaling_mode = DRM_MODE_SCALE_FULLSCREEN; drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, dev->mode_config.scaling_mode_property, -- 1.8.5.5

...tm->msto; i++) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This doesn't make sense. Maybe mstm->msto[i] was intended?? 3159 drm_mode_connector_attach_encoder(&mstc->connector, &mstm->msto[i]->encoder); 3160 3161 drm_object_attach_property(&mstc->connector.base, dev->mode_config.path_property, 0); 3162 drm_object_attach_property(&mstc->connector.base, dev->mode_config.tile_property, 0); 3163 drm_mode_connector_set_path_property(&mstc->connector, path); 3164 return 0; regard...

...or *connector) { struct nv50_mstc *mstc = nv50_mstc(connector); + drm_connector_cleanup(&mstc->connector); + if (mstc->port) + drm_dp_mst_put_port_malloc(mstc->port); + kfree(mstc); } @@ -1012,6 +1016,7 @@ nv50_mstc_new(struct nv50_mstm *mstm, struct drm_dp_mst_port *port, drm_object_attach_property(&mstc->connector.base, dev->mode_config.path_property, 0); drm_object_attach_property(&mstc->connector.base, dev->mode_config.tile_property, 0); drm_connector_set_path_property(&mstc->connector, path); + drm_dp_mst_get_port_malloc(port); return 0; } @@ -1077,6 +1...

...quot;. > > I haven't the faintest clue whether the msto array can have "holes" or not. Indeed. Let's see what Ben says. > >> drm_mode_connector_attach_encoder(&mstc->connector, &mstm->msto[i]->encoder); >> >> drm_object_attach_property(&mstc->connector.base, dev->mode_config.path_property, 0); >> -- >> 2.11.0 >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http...

...er); + if (!prop) + goto err_free_mode_prop; + + connector->underscan_hborder_property = prop; + + prop = drm_property_create_range(dev, 0, "underscan vborder", 0, + max_vborder); + if (!prop) + goto err_free_hborder_prop; + + connector->underscan_vborder_property = prop; + + drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, + connector->underscan_mode_property, + DRM_UNDERSCAN_OFF); + drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, + connector->underscan_hborder_property, 0); + drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, + connector->underscan_vbord...

...gt; - !plane->props.saturation || > - !plane->props.iturbt_709) > + !plane->props.saturation) > goto cleanup; > > plane->colorkey = 0; > @@ -343,9 +339,13 @@ nv10_overlay_init(struct drm_device *device) > drm_object_attach_property(&plane->base.base, > plane->props.saturation, plane->saturation); > > - plane->iturbt_709 = 0; > - drm_object_attach_property(&plane->base.base, > - plane->props.iturbt_709, plan...

...er); + if (!prop) + goto err_free_mode_prop; + + connector->underscan_hborder_property = prop; + + prop = drm_property_create_range(dev, 0, "underscan vborder", 0, + max_vborder); + if (!prop) + goto err_free_hborder_prop; + + connector->underscan_vborder_property = prop; + + drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, + connector->underscan_mode_property, + DRM_UNDERSCAN_OFF); + drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, + connector->underscan_hborder_property, 0); + drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, + connector->underscan_vbord...

Hello, This is an attempt at providing generic support for underscan connector props. We already have 3 drivers defining the same underscan, underscan vborder and underscan hborder properties (amd, radeon and nouveau) and I am about to add a new one, hence my proposal to put the prop parsing code in the core and add ->underscan fields to drm_connector_state. In this v2, I also converted the

...= prop; > > + > > + prop = drm_property_create_range(dev, 0, "underscan vborder", 0, > > + max_vborder); > > + if (!prop) > > + goto err_free_hborder_prop; > > + > > + connector->underscan_vborder_property = prop; > > + > > + drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, > > + connector->underscan_mode_property, > > + DRM_UNDERSCAN_OFF); > > + drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, > > + connector->underscan_hborder_property, 0); > > + drm_object_attach_property(&connect...

Otherwise none of the format checks pass, since the width was still in 16.16 encoding. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- This must have been some sort of last-second cleanup I made and forgot to test, because with this code, there's no way it could ever have worked... drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 17 +++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 9

...; >+ >+ connector->underscan_hborder_property = prop; >+ >+ prop = drm_property_create_range(dev, 0, "underscan vborder", 0, >+ max_vborder); >+ if (!prop) >+ goto err_free_hborder_prop; >+ >+ connector->underscan_vborder_property = prop; >+ >+ drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, >+ connector->underscan_mode_property, >+ DRM_UNDERSCAN_OFF); >+ drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, >+ connector->underscan_hborder_property, 0); >+ drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, >+ conne...

Hello, This is an attempt at providing generic support for underscan connector props. We already have 3 drivers defining the same underscan, underscan vborder and underscan hborder properties (amd, radeon and nouveau) and I am about to add a new one, hence my proposal to put the prop parsing code in the core and add ->underscan fields to drm_connector_state. This v3 was based on the "VC4

...t; + connector->underscan_hborder_property = prop; > + > + prop = drm_property_create_range(dev, 0, "underscan vborder", 0, > + max_vborder); > + if (!prop) > + goto err_free_hborder_prop; > + > + connector->underscan_vborder_property = prop; > + > + drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, > + connector->underscan_mode_property, > + DRM_UNDERSCAN_OFF); > + drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, > + connector->underscan_hborder_property, 0); > + drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, > +...

...for (...; i < ARRAY_SIZE; i++) if (mstm->msto[i]) do_stuff() I haven't the faintest clue whether the msto array can have "holes" or not. > drm_mode_connector_attach_encoder(&mstc->connector, &mstm->msto[i]->encoder); > > drm_object_attach_property(&mstc->connector.base, dev->mode_config.path_property, 0); > -- > 2.11.0 >

...NECTOR_POLL_HPD; encoder->possible_crtcs = 1 << num_output; drm_connector_attach_encoder(&qxl_output->base, &qxl_output->enc); - drm_encoder_helper_add(encoder, &qxl_enc_helper_funcs); drm_connector_helper_add(connector, &qxl_connector_helper_funcs); drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, -- 2.25.0