Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "drm_legacy_ioctl_def".
2020 May 12
2
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
...non-KMS drivers.
> > E.g., mach64, r128, sis, savage, etc.
>
> Exactly my point. There's one drm_agp_init() call left in radeon. The
> rest of the AGP code is apparently for legacy non-KMS drivers. Should
> the related ioctl calls be declared as legacy (i.e., listed with
> DRM_LEGACY_IOCTL_DEF instead of DRM_IOCTL_DEF)? If so, much of the AGP
> core code could probably be moved behind CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY as well.
Ah, I forgot about drm_agp_init(). I was just thinking the other AGP
stuff. Yeah, I think we could make it legacy.
Alex
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
> >...
2020 May 12
2
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 2:29 PM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Am 11.05.20 um 19:17 schrieb Christian K?nig:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Well let's face it AGP is a total headache to maintain and dead for at least 10+ years.
> >
> > We have a lot of x86 specific stuff in the architecture independent graphics memory
2020 May 13
0
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
...t; E.g., mach64, r128, sis, savage, etc.
> >
> > Exactly my point. There's one drm_agp_init() call left in radeon. The
> > rest of the AGP code is apparently for legacy non-KMS drivers. Should
> > the related ioctl calls be declared as legacy (i.e., listed with
> > DRM_LEGACY_IOCTL_DEF instead of DRM_IOCTL_DEF)? If so, much of the AGP
> > core code could probably be moved behind CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY as well.
>
> Ah, I forgot about drm_agp_init(). I was just thinking the other AGP
> stuff. Yeah, I think we could make it legacy.
>
Fwiw I've got local patches a)...
2020 May 12
0
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
...ode is mainly (only?) for the non-KMS drivers.
> E.g., mach64, r128, sis, savage, etc.
Exactly my point. There's one drm_agp_init() call left in radeon. The
rest of the AGP code is apparently for legacy non-KMS drivers. Should
the related ioctl calls be declared as legacy (i.e., listed with
DRM_LEGACY_IOCTL_DEF instead of DRM_IOCTL_DEF)? If so, much of the AGP
core code could probably be moved behind CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY as well.
Best regards
Thomas
>
> Alex
>
>>
>> Best regards
>> Thomas
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>&...