Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "drm_ioctl_def".
Did you mean:
drm_ioctl_desc
2010 Jan 18
1
[PATCH] drm: remove UMS leftover
...e_priv)
{
diff -Naur a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_channel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_channel.c
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_channel.c 2010-01-18 13:27:35.702877591 +0100
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_channel.c 2010-01-18 13:30:35.002877939 +0100
@@ -420,8 +420,6 @@
DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_NEW, nouveau_gem_ioctl_new, DRM_AUTH),
DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_PUSHBUF, nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf, DRM_AUTH),
DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_PUSHBUF_CALL, nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf_call, DRM_AUTH),
- DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_PIN, nouveau_gem_ioctl_pin, DRM_AUTH),
- DRM...
2020 May 12
2
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
..., mach64, r128, sis, savage, etc.
>
> Exactly my point. There's one drm_agp_init() call left in radeon. The
> rest of the AGP code is apparently for legacy non-KMS drivers. Should
> the related ioctl calls be declared as legacy (i.e., listed with
> DRM_LEGACY_IOCTL_DEF instead of DRM_IOCTL_DEF)? If so, much of the AGP
> core code could probably be moved behind CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY as well.
Ah, I forgot about drm_agp_init(). I was just thinking the other AGP
stuff. Yeah, I think we could make it legacy.
Alex
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
> >
> > Alex
> >...
2017 Jul 31
2
[PATCH] Add drm ioctl DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETFB2 & associated helpers.
...ng on an FB
* @dev: drm device for the ioctl
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
index a7c61c23685a..a9b578dc5d17 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
@@ -627,6 +627,7 @@ static const struct drm_ioctl_desc drm_ioctls[] = {
DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETPROPERTY, drm_mode_connector_property_set_ioctl, DRM_MASTER|DRM_CONTROL_ALLOW|DRM_UNLOCKED),
DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETPROPBLOB, drm_mode_getblob_ioctl, DRM_CONTROL_ALLOW|DRM_UNLOCKED),
DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETFB, drm_mode_getfb, DRM_CONTROL_ALLOW|DRM_UNLOCKED),...
2020 May 12
2
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 2:29 PM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Am 11.05.20 um 19:17 schrieb Christian K?nig:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Well let's face it AGP is a total headache to maintain and dead for at least 10+ years.
> >
> > We have a lot of x86 specific stuff in the architecture independent graphics memory
2020 May 13
0
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
...ge, etc.
> >
> > Exactly my point. There's one drm_agp_init() call left in radeon. The
> > rest of the AGP code is apparently for legacy non-KMS drivers. Should
> > the related ioctl calls be declared as legacy (i.e., listed with
> > DRM_LEGACY_IOCTL_DEF instead of DRM_IOCTL_DEF)? If so, much of the AGP
> > core code could probably be moved behind CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY as well.
>
> Ah, I forgot about drm_agp_init(). I was just thinking the other AGP
> stuff. Yeah, I think we could make it legacy.
>
Fwiw I've got local patches a) removing drm_agp_init()...
2020 May 12
0
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
...n-KMS drivers.
> E.g., mach64, r128, sis, savage, etc.
Exactly my point. There's one drm_agp_init() call left in radeon. The
rest of the AGP code is apparently for legacy non-KMS drivers. Should
the related ioctl calls be declared as legacy (i.e., listed with
DRM_LEGACY_IOCTL_DEF instead of DRM_IOCTL_DEF)? If so, much of the AGP
core code could probably be moved behind CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY as well.
Best regards
Thomas
>
> Alex
>
>>
>> Best regards
>> Thomas
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>>
>>> ________...
2010 Mar 10
34
[Patch RFC] nouveau accelerated on Xen pv-ops kernel
Hi,
Following is a simple patch that is needed in nouveau to get
accelerated X on a Xen dom0 pv_ops kernel. The kernel is jeremy's
2.6.31.6 as of 20100222. The whole gpu tree of nouveau (which is
almost the mainline merge), was substituted into the kernel-tree.
All components of X (mesa, Xorg-server-7.5, xf86-nouveau, libdrm) used
of the same day.
Patch:
diff -Naur
2010 Mar 10
34
[Patch RFC] nouveau accelerated on Xen pv-ops kernel
Hi,
Following is a simple patch that is needed in nouveau to get
accelerated X on a Xen dom0 pv_ops kernel. The kernel is jeremy's
2.6.31.6 as of 20100222. The whole gpu tree of nouveau (which is
almost the mainline merge), was substituted into the kernel-tree.
All components of X (mesa, Xorg-server-7.5, xf86-nouveau, libdrm) used
of the same day.
Patch:
diff -Naur
2010 Aug 06
4
nv vpe video decoder
Hello,
I have my work on the nv vpe video decoder in a functional
state. In case you didn't know this decoder accelerates mpeg2
video at the idct/mc level. I have verified that it works on
nv40 hardware. I believe it works on nv30 hardware (and
maybe some earlier hardware), but I cannot verify since I have
none.
I will reply with patches against the kernel, drm, ddx
and mesa for