Displaying 20 results from an estimated 23 matches for "drm_format_mod_invalid".
2020 Jul 18
2
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
...er *fb,
}
}
+static const u64 legacy_modifiers[] = {
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(0),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(1),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(2),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(3),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(4),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(5),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID
+};
+
static int
nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
uint64_t modifier,
@@ -247,8 +263,14 @@ nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
(disp->format_modifiers[mod] != modifier);
mod++);
- if (disp->format_modifiers[mod] == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_I...
2020 Jul 18
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
...gt; + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(0),
>> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(1),
>> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(2),
>> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(3),
>> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(4),
>> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(5),
>> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID
>> +};
>> +
>> static int
>> nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>> uint64_t modifier,
>> @@ -247,8 +263,14 @@ nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>> (disp->format_modifiers[mod] != modifier);
>&g...
2020 Jul 17
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
...legacy_modifiers[] = {
> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(0),
> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(1),
> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(2),
> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(3),
> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(4),
> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(5),
> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID
> +};
> +
> static int
> nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
> uint64_t modifier,
> @@ -247,8 +263,14 @@ nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
> (disp->format_modifiers[mod] != modifier);
> mod++);
>
> - if (...
2020 Jul 17
5
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
...er *fb,
}
}
+static const u64 legacy_modifiers[] = {
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(0),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(1),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(2),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(3),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(4),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(5),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID
+};
+
static int
nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
uint64_t modifier,
@@ -247,8 +263,14 @@ nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
(disp->format_modifiers[mod] != modifier);
mod++);
- if (disp->format_modifiers[mod] == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_I...
2020 Jul 30
0
[PATCH v4] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
...er *fb,
}
}
+static const u64 legacy_modifiers[] = {
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(0),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(1),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(2),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(3),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(4),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(5),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID
+};
+
static int
nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
uint64_t modifier,
@@ -247,8 +264,14 @@ nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
(disp->format_modifiers[mod] != modifier);
mod++);
- if (disp->format_modifiers[mod] == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_I...
2020 Jul 24
0
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
...RMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(0),
> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(1),
> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(2),
> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(3),
> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(4),
> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(5),
> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID
> +};
> +
> static int
> nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
> uint64_t modifier,
> @@ -247,8 +263,14 @@ nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
> (disp->format_modifiers[mod] != modifier);
>...
2020 Jul 30
2
[PATCH v3] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
...er *fb,
}
}
+static const u64 legacy_modifiers[] = {
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(0),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(1),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(2),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(3),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(4),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(5),
+ DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID
+};
+
static int
nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
uint64_t modifier,
@@ -247,8 +263,14 @@ nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
(disp->format_modifiers[mod] != modifier);
mod++);
- if (disp->format_modifiers[mod] == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_I...
2020 Jul 27
2
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
...OCK(0),
>> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(1),
>> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(2),
>> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(3),
>> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(4),
>> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(5),
>> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID
>> +};
>> +
>> static int
>> nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>> uint64_t modifier,
>> @@ -247,8 +263,14 @@ nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>> (disp->format_modifiers...
2019 Dec 11
2
[PATCH 3/3] drm/nouveau: Support NVIDIA format modifiers
...ious). Sadly 0x67/0x68 are higher
than 0x50 numerically, but are logically part of the nv4x generation.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + BUG_ON(!disp->format_modifiers);
> +
> + for (mod = 0;
> + (disp->format_modifiers[mod] != DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID) &&
> + (disp->format_modifiers[mod] != modifier);
> + mod++);
> +
> + if (disp->format_modifiers[mod] == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR) {
> +...
2020 Feb 05
3
[PATCH v3 0/3] drm/nouveau: Support NVIDIA format modifiers
This series modifies the NV5x+ nouveau display backends to advertise
appropriate format modifiers on their display planes in atomic mode
setting blobs.
Corresponding modifications to Mesa/userspace are available on the
Mesa-dev mailing list as the series:
nouveau: Improved format modifier support
I've tested this on Tesla, Kepler, Pascal, and Turing-class hardware
using various formats
2019 Dec 11
5
[PATCH 0/3] drm/nouveau: Support NVIDIA format modifiers
This series modifies the NV5x+ nouveau display backends to advertise
appropriate format modifiers on their display planes in atomic mode
setting blobs.
Corresponding modifications to Mesa/userspace are available here:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/cubanismo/mesa/tree/nouveau_work
But those need a bit of cleanup before they're ready to submit.
I've tested this on Tesla, Kepler, Pascal,
2020 Feb 10
3
[PATCH v5 0/3] drm/nouveau: Support NVIDIA format modifiers
This series modifies the NV5x+ nouveau display backends to advertise
appropriate format modifiers on their display planes in atomic mode
setting blobs.
Corresponding modifications to Mesa/userspace are available on the
Mesa-dev gitlab merge request 3724:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/3724
I've tested this on Tesla, Kepler, Pascal, and Turing-class hardware
using
2020 Feb 07
3
[PATCH v4 0/3] drm/nouveau: Support NVIDIA format modifiers
This series modifies the NV5x+ nouveau display backends to advertise
appropriate format modifiers on their display planes in atomic mode
setting blobs.
Corresponding modifications to Mesa/userspace are available on the
Mesa-dev gitlab merge request 3724:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/3724
I've tested this on Tesla, Kepler, Pascal, and Turing-class hardware
using
2019 Dec 11
0
[PATCH 3/3] drm/nouveau: Support NVIDIA format modifiers
...8_t *kind)
+{
+ struct nouveau_display *disp = nouveau_display(drm->dev);
+ int mod;
+
+ BUG_ON(!tile_mode || !kind);
+
+ if (drm->client.device.info.chipset < 0x50) {
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ BUG_ON(!disp->format_modifiers);
+
+ for (mod = 0;
+ (disp->format_modifiers[mod] != DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID) &&
+ (disp->format_modifiers[mod] != modifier);
+ mod++);
+
+ if (disp->format_modifiers[mod] == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR) {
+ /* tile_mode will not be used in this case */
+ *tile_mode = 0;
+ *kind = 0;
+ } els...
2019 Dec 13
0
[PATCH 3/3] drm/nouveau: Support NVIDIA format modifiers
...I'll get this fixed and send out an updated patchset.
Thanks,
-James
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(!disp->format_modifiers);
>> +
>> + for (mod = 0;
>> + (disp->format_modifiers[mod] != DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID) &&
>> + (disp->format_modifiers[mod] != modifier);
>> + mod++);
>> +
>> + if (disp->format_modifiers[mod] == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD...
2019 Dec 17
6
[PATCH v2 0/3] drm/nouveau: Support NVIDIA format modifiers
This series modifies the NV5x+ nouveau display backends to advertise
appropriate format modifiers on their display planes in atomic mode
setting blobs.
Corresponding modifications to Mesa/userspace are available here:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/cubanismo/mesa/tree/nouveau_work
But those need a bit of cleanup before they're ready to submit.
I've tested this on Tesla, Kepler, Pascal,
2020 Mar 29
0
[ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.20.8
...ce the recent OOM fixes.
George Matsumura (1):
Restrict 1x1 pixmap filling optimization to GXcopy
Jon Turney (2):
Add xf86OSInputThreadInit to stub os-support as well
Fix old-style definition warning for xf86OSInputThreadInit()
Jonas ?dahl (1):
xwayland/glamor-gbm: Handle DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID gracefully
Kenneth Graunke (1):
configure: Define GLAMOR_HAS_EGL_QUERY_DRIVER when available
Maarten Lankhorst (1):
modesetting: Disable atomic support by default
Matt Turner (1):
xserver 1.20.8
Michel D?nzer (8):
modesetting: Explicitly #include "mi.h"
x...
2023 Feb 15
17
[PATCH 00/17] cirrus: Modernize the cirrus driver
Update the cirrus driver to follow current best practices. While the
driver's hardware is obsolete, the cirrus driver is still one of the
go-to modules to learn about writing a DRM driver. So keep it in good
shape.
Patches 1 to 3 simplify blitting and convert it to the DRM's current
helpers.
Patches 4 to 8 replace simple-KMS helpers with DRM's regular atomic
helpers. The former are
2019 Oct 15
1
[PATCH] drm: Generalized NV Block Linear DRM format mod
...t, and I don't want to try to support such usage. Maybe just
> drop the "is_pre_turing" parameter and always canonicalize by mapping 0
> -> 0xfe as the comment above states, and not touching other values? Or
> should any invalid modifier, including this case, return
> DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID? This latter idea seems risky because it would
> cause software compiled against old drm_fourcc.h to potentially reject
> format modifiers from newer kernels or libraries with an expanded
> representation, but maybe that's what we want if only driver components
> are supposed to ca...
2019 Oct 15
0
[PATCH] drm: Generalized NV Block Linear DRM format mod
...with
Turing+ yet, and I don't want to try to support such usage. Maybe just
drop the "is_pre_turing" parameter and always canonicalize by mapping 0
-> 0xfe as the comment above states, and not touching other values? Or
should any invalid modifier, including this case, return
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID? This latter idea seems risky because it would
cause software compiled against old drm_fourcc.h to potentially reject
format modifiers from newer kernels or libraries with an expanded
representation, but maybe that's what we want if only driver components
are supposed to call this function...