Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "drm_agp_init".
Did you mean:
drm_agp_info
2020 May 12
2
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
...as legacy? It would appear to me that KMS-based drivers don't
> >> have to manage AGP by themselves. (?)
> >
> > The old drm core AGP code is mainly (only?) for the non-KMS drivers.
> > E.g., mach64, r128, sis, savage, etc.
>
> Exactly my point. There's one drm_agp_init() call left in radeon. The
> rest of the AGP code is apparently for legacy non-KMS drivers. Should
> the related ioctl calls be declared as legacy (i.e., listed with
> DRM_LEGACY_IOCTL_DEF instead of DRM_IOCTL_DEF)? If so, much of the AGP
> core code could probably be moved behind CONFI...
2020 May 13
0
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
...me that KMS-based drivers don't
> > >> have to manage AGP by themselves. (?)
> > >
> > > The old drm core AGP code is mainly (only?) for the non-KMS drivers.
> > > E.g., mach64, r128, sis, savage, etc.
> >
> > Exactly my point. There's one drm_agp_init() call left in radeon. The
> > rest of the AGP code is apparently for legacy non-KMS drivers. Should
> > the related ioctl calls be declared as legacy (i.e., listed with
> > DRM_LEGACY_IOCTL_DEF instead of DRM_IOCTL_DEF)? If so, much of the AGP
> > core code could probably b...
2020 May 12
2
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 2:29 PM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Am 11.05.20 um 19:17 schrieb Christian K?nig:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Well let's face it AGP is a total headache to maintain and dead for at least 10+ years.
> >
> > We have a lot of x86 specific stuff in the architecture independent graphics memory
2020 May 12
0
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
...an they be
>> declared as legacy? It would appear to me that KMS-based drivers don't
>> have to manage AGP by themselves. (?)
>
> The old drm core AGP code is mainly (only?) for the non-KMS drivers.
> E.g., mach64, r128, sis, savage, etc.
Exactly my point. There's one drm_agp_init() call left in radeon. The
rest of the AGP code is apparently for legacy non-KMS drivers. Should
the related ioctl calls be declared as legacy (i.e., listed with
DRM_LEGACY_IOCTL_DEF instead of DRM_IOCTL_DEF)? If so, much of the AGP
core code could probably be moved behind CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY as well...
2005 Dec 17
6
i915drm
HI all,
I am running FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE (of today) on a HP Pavillon (centrino based
notebook with i915 graphic chipset).
I am trying to use the latest drm hook for i915, but I get this error:
drmsub0: <Intel i915GM> port 0x1800-0x1807 mem
0xb0080000-0xb00fffff,0xc0000000-0xcfffffff,0xb0000000-0xb003ffff irq 16 at
device 2.0 on pci0
error: [drm:pid0:drm_load] *ERROR* Card isn't AGP, or