search for: drive_

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "drive_".

Did you mean: driver
2016 May 03
9
[Bug 95251] New: vdpau decoder capabilities: not supported
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95251 Bug ID: 95251 Summary: vdpau decoder capabilities: not supported Product: Mesa Version: 11.2 Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at
2008 Apr 30
3
0.9.60 Wine with Ubunto 8.04- Create "S" drive with space
I am attempting to install a windows base business management program on Wine 0.9.60 I tried to install using the wines windows XP, but ran into shell32.dll problems. Iread Sticky's notations, and switched to wines windows 98. This allowed the setup.exe to move ahead, but when it looked at the S drive location it wanted to install to, it found no allocated space. It needs 483803. I do not
2013 Feb 08
0
Test for GPT MBR code
Attached file I use to test GPT code. I used qemu 1.2 with seabios with LSI enabled and a patch diff --git a/src/blockcmd.c b/src/blockcmd.c index 77c690f..df4fb1e 100644 --- a/src/blockcmd.c +++ b/src/blockcmd.c @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ scsi_init_drive(struct drive_s *drive, const char *s, int prio) // We do not bother with READ CAPACITY(16) because BIOS does not support // 64-bit LBA anyway. drive->blksize = be32_to_cpu(capdata.blksize); - if (drive->blksize != DISK_SECTOR_SIZE) { + if (drive->blksize != DISK_SECTOR_SIZE &&am...
2006 Mar 15
2
Drive Designation
I keep reading on this list where drive C: is referred to as "~/.wine/drive_c" but on my system (due to no special smarts on my part that would be "~/.wine/dosdevices/c:" instead. Why this difference? Are the ones who post basing their operation on an older way of doing things? The ability to use "c:" rather than "drive_c" seems nicer...
2013 Dec 18
1
Initial support for sector size >512
On 12/16/2013 05:18 AM, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > Surely should apply to 4.xx where they was developed but I think I send > them for 5.xx. mbr part of patches was merged time ago. > Unfortunately I had no time to update other patches. If I remember there > was a problem on the way ADV was implemented (using the same sector). > > Unfortunately my company business required to