search for: drive2

...on doing this... it prolly would be a bad idea, but hey, does it hurt to ask?**** I have been thinking, and would it be a good idea, to have on the 2TB drives, say 1TB or 500GB "files" and then mount them as mirrored? So basically, have a 2TB hard drive, set up like: (where drive1 and drive2 are the paths to the mount points) Mkfile 465gb /drive1/drive1part1 Mkfile 465gb /drive1/drive1part2 Mkfile 465gb /drive1/drive1part3 Mkfile 465gb /drive1/drive1part4 Mkfile 465gb /drive2/drive2part1 Mkfile 465gb /drive2/drive2part2 Mkfile 465gb /drive2/drive2part3 Mkfile 465gb /drive2/drive2part4...

...do the same from python 2.3, I get >>> import os >>> os.system("c:\\WINDOWS\\system32\\fc /?") Compares two files or sets of files and displays the differences between them FC [/A] [/C] [/L] [/LBn] [/N] [/OFF[LINE]] [/T] [/U] [/W] [/nnnn] [drive1:][path1]filename1 [drive2:][path2]filename2 FC /B [drive1:][path1]filename1 [drive2:][path2]filename2 /A Displays only first and last lines for each set of differences. /B Performs a binary comparison. /C Disregards the case of letters. /L Compares files as ASCII text. /LBn S...

...from a few small hard disk drives. While logged on as root, I've mounted partitions on two of those image files, via the loop device: # first partition in drive1.ima is an NTFS partition: losetup -r -o 32256 /dev/loop1 drive1.ima mount -t ntfs /dev/loop1 /mnt/img1 # first partition in drive2.ima is a FAT32 partition: losetup -o 32256 /dev/loop2 drive2.ima mount -t vfat /dev/loop2 /mnt/img2 The drive*.ima files and /mnt/img* mount points are all owned by root and are wide-open ("chmod 777"). The loop device mounts work fine: From the Linux box, I can view the files in bo...

...yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 os level = 32 domain master = yes name resolve order = host bcast dead time = 15 ;============================ Share Declarations ============================== [database] comment = Access Database path = /mnt/drive2/database public = no read only = no create mask = 0777 [public] comment = Public Data path = /mnt/drive2/public public = yes read only = no users = @users force group = users write list = @users map archive = yes map hidden = yes map system = yes create ma...

Hello, I have a Dell 1850 with dual Xeon procs and two u320 36Gb drives. I would like to set this up as dual boot system with 4.2 on disk 0 and 3.6 on disk 1. I imagine that I would install 4.2 first and then 3.6. Would I need to remove the other hard drive while installing a given version? Any gotchas? How about setting up GRUB? Anything special or does the install take care of it? Thanks,

...- partition=$(readlink -f $(findfs LABEL=Root)) - if [ -n "$partition" ]; then - log "Removing partitions" - eval $(echo $partition | awk ' { - print "drive=" substr($0,1,length($1)-1); - print "drive2=" substr($0,1,length($1)-2); - }') - if [ ! -e "$drive" ]; then - drive="$drive2" - partpv="$drive}p2" - else - partpv="${drive}2" - fi - parted -s $driv...

...- partition=$(readlink -f $(findfs LABEL=Root)) - if [ -n "$partition" ]; then - log "Removing partitions" - eval $(echo $partition | awk ' { - print "drive=" substr($0,1,length($1)-1); - print "drive2=" substr($0,1,length($1)-2); - }') - if [ ! -e "$drive" ]; then - drive="$drive2" - partpv="$drive}p2" - else - partpv="${drive}2" - fi - parted -s $driv...

...- partition=$(readlink -f $(findfs LABEL=Root)) - if [ -n "$partition" ]; then - log "Removing partitions" - eval $(echo $partition | awk ' { - print "drive=" substr($0,1,length($1)-1); - print "drive2=" substr($0,1,length($1)-2); - }') - if [ ! -e "$drive" ]; then - drive="$drive2" - partpv="$drive}p2" - else - partpv="${drive}2" - fi - parted -s $driv...

...or > disk = [ ''tap:aio:/xen/test/rhel5ga_full.img,xvda,w'' ] > > It is assumed that hda is a volume of the system > if both xvda and hda are specified. > > disk = [ ''file:/xen/test/rhel5ga_full.img,hda,w'', > ''tap:aio:/xen/test/drive2.img,xvda,w'' ] > > Best Regards, > > -- > Takanori Kasai > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kasai Takanori" <kasai.takanori@jp.fujitsu.com> > To: "xen-devel" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2...

All other patches from the sequence remain unchanged. Repost of patch 6 based on comments from Joey to follow. Mike

Hi All, I am looking at ZFS and I get that they call it RAIDZ which is similar to RAID 5, but what about RAID 10? Isn''t a RAID 10 setup better for data protection? So if I have 8 x 1.5tb drives, wouldn''t I: - mirror drive 1 and 5 - mirror drive 2 and 6 - mirror drive 3 and 7 - mirror drive 4 and 8 Then stripe 1,2,3,4 Then stripe 5,6,7,8 How does one do this with ZFS?

Hi. Several months ago, I posted my first pass at a patch to transfer Mac OS X HFS+ metadata (resource forks and Finder metadata) to non-HFS+ filesystems (Linux, Solaris, etc). I finally got a chance to update the patch to reflect suggestions offered on the list. Thanks for the ideas, this version should be a big improvement. The diff and a binary (and a fuller explanation) can be found at:

Hi, I've recently benchmarked btrfs v0.11 & v0.12 against ext2, ext3, ext4, jfs, reiserfs and xfs. OS: Ubuntu Hardy Kernel: 2.6.24(-5-server) Hardware: --------- Fu-Si Primergy RX330 S1 * AMD Opteron 2210 1.8 GHz * 1 GB RAM * 3 x 73 GB, 3Gb/s, hot plug, 10k rpm, 3.5" SAS HDD * LSI RAID 128 MB Fu-Si Econel 200 * Intel Xeon 5110 * 512 MB RAM

This set of patches introduces support for multipath devices for storage. Comments and suggestions are appreciated. Mike

...SO_RCVBUF=8192 > > os level = 32 > domain master = yes > > name resolve order = host bcast > > dead time = 15 > >;============================ Share Declarations >============================== >[database] > comment = Access Database > path = /mnt/drive2/database > public = no > read only = no > create mask = 0777 > >[public] > comment = Public Data > path = /mnt/drive2/public > public = yes > read only = no > users = @users > force group = users > write list = @users > map archive = yes...

On 02/27/2010 10:31 PM, swdamle at bsnl.in wrote: > Hello, > This has reference to ""Dos installer" from Win98se in Syslinux-3.84. > > Sorry to say the problem CONTINUES with Syslinux-3.85. Following is > for your reference please. > You may want to try: http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/syslinux/syslinux.com ... which is compiled with debugging information turned

The following patches introduce support for multipath and cciss devices to the ovirt-node and node-image. Comments are appreciated. These patches assume that the 3 patches (2 node, 1 node-image) from Joey are all incorporated. Mike

...f you want to allow raw device access) ;; #[Drive A] #"Path" = "/mnt/fd0" #"Type" = "floppy" #"Label" = "Floppy" #"Serial" = "87654321" #"Device" = "/dev/fd0" [Drive C] "Path" = "/mnt/drive2/chris/wine" "Type" = "hd" "Label" = "MS-DOS" "Filesystem" = "win95" [Drive D] "Path" = "/cdrom" "Type" = "cdrom" "Label" = "CD-Rom" "Filesystem" = "win95&quot...

...Buffer: no no Post Write Buffer: no no Enabled: yes yes Simplex only: no no Cable Type: 80w 40w -------------------drive0----drive1----drive2----drive3----- Transfer Mode: UDMA PIO PIO PIO Address Setup: 30ns 120ns 30ns 120ns Cmd Active: 90ns 90ns 90ns 90ns Cmd Recovery: 30ns 30ns 30ns 30ns Data Active: 90ns 330ns 90ns 330ns Data...