search for: drinker

I cannot seem to get a L'abbe plot to work on R. I do not understand what the X coordinates, or alternatively an object of class metabin, is supposed to mean. What is a class of metabin? Institute of Behavioral Genetics University of Colorado, Boulder Whitney.Melroy at Colorado.EDU

...ended. It might be handy to put this in the windows docs since it costed me quite some time to discover. This is for reference to other users that are having heap issues: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25026488/c11-vs2013-class-pod-member-initialization On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 4:33 PM, koffie drinker <gekkekoe at gmail.com> wrote: > I found the root cause, but I don't know what's the best approach to fix > it. > > Under windows, 64 bit, when a function is created the void *User::operator > new(size_t Size) operator allocates space + Use*. > In the Use* the HasHu...

...lvm::Twine & N, llvm::Module * M) Line 116 C++ caused it to be set to False. So do I need to trace into all the Function bases classes and find out where it is set to false? or do I need to fix the Storage address computation in the else part? Cheers, On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:07 PM, koffie drinker <gekkekoe at gmail.com> wrote: > I made the llvm::Function() constructor public (for testing purpose) and > used the non-overloaded new. > > auto func = ::new llvm::Function(...) > if (func) func->eraseFromParent(); > > And the heap corruption is gone! Did something c...

Hi, I'm trying to speed up the JIT time with llvm (3.9.1). So far i've implemented the object cache, used FastISel and disabled optimizations. Jit time is still too slow for my purpose (I do have a lot of code to Jit). http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#threads-and-the-jit states that we can invoke ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction() concurrently. This function was replaced

...(for testing purpose) and used the non-overloaded new. auto func = ::new llvm::Function(...) if (func) func->eraseFromParent(); And the heap corruption is gone! Did something changed in llvm::User::new between 3.7.1 and 3.8.0 ? I found a bug in llvm ? On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:10 PM, koffie drinker <gekkekoe at gmail.com> wrote: > I downloaded 3.8.0rc3 and I also have it in 3.8.0rc3. > I did set a data access breakpoint on the first function ptr that causes > the invalid heap. This would allow me to break whenever someone is touching > that address. It did not show double d...

...1.345113 0.181593 7.407 1.58e-13 *** q18xOK 0.074950 0.089852 0.834 0.404252 q19xOK 0.080513 0.091597 0.879 0.379461 q19xBad 0.213237 0.097400 2.189 0.028637 * heavyHeavy drinkers (>3 / >4) 0.324062 0.111947 2.895 0.003816 ** bingeBinge drinkers (6+ / 8+) 0.104460 0.136534 0.765 0.444270 smoksumNon-smokers -0.562577 0.111547 -5.043 4.79e-07 *** q41sumNo accident in past 12 months 0.120413 0.087097 1.383 0.166895...

On Thu, February 5, 2015 9:34 am, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 09:51 -0500, Lamar Owen wrote: > >> On 02/04/2015 07:55 PM, Always Learning wrote: >> > Rent ? That costs money. Just crack open some Windoze machines and do >> > it for free. That is what many hackers do. >> >> Those crackers who build these botnets are the ones who

...h details and a discussion of the timeline to the dev-list in the next few days. That will contain suggestions on how to transition to the new APIs (which I expect to be relatively painless for most people). I can CC you on it if that helps? Cheers, Lang. On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:00 AM, koffie drinker via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > There's a orc mcjit drop in replacement in the source tree. > Am I correct to assume that Orc is used (and emulating mcjit behaviour) > when replacing > LLVMLinkInOrcMCJITReplacement(); > //LLVMLinkInMCJIT(); > and lin...

...your data and wreck your > systems. They have no scruples. There is a real cyber war going-on and > your systems are their targets. > >> I know, I know, everybody is reasonable, it is just I didn't have my >> coffee yet... > > Your logic is amazingly good for a coffee drinker. > No, I wasn't born here though I live here, so I don't take to my heart any jokes about people living in one of the colonies you lost ;-) Just stealing it from some movie I like. Still didn't have chance for my morning coffee yet (which I deserve: I was working hard all morning)....

Hi, What other options do I have to reduce JIT time for large amount of code? - setting optimization level to none helps a lot - enabling FastISel doesn't seem to help much Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160812/f05d51fb/attachment.html>

I'm on llvm 3.8.1 and was wondering if there's a memory leak in the removeModule impl of mcjit. In the tutorial http://llvm.org/releases/3.8.1/docs/tutorial/LangImpl4.html a module is removed from the Jit by invoking removeModule. According to the tutorial: "Its API is very simple:: addModule adds an LLVM IR module to the JIT, making its functions available for execution;

> On Dec 20, 2016, at 9:13 AM, koffie drinker via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to speed up the JIT time with llvm (3.9.1). > So far i've implemented the object cache, used FastISel and disabled optimizations. I can’t help with the rest, but just wanted to mention that total...

...day. In addition to looking at the number of activity bouts across the day, I am also interested in the duration of each activity bout. My current method of analyzing numbers and durations of activity bouts involves; 1) documenting the number of activity bouts for each condition (alcohol or water drinker) and then, using repeated measures ANOVA to account for three days of activity recording 2) displaying the number of each bout duration (expressed in 15 minute bins) in a frequency histogram, that again, documents differences in bout number between conditions. My concern lies in the size of the fre...

+Lang for JIT things. On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 8:50 AM koffie drinker via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm building a runtime that can jit and execute code. I've followed the > kaleidoscope tutorial and had a couple of questions. Basically I have a > pre-compiler that compiles the code to cache objects. Th...

...locatable objects as soon as possible (which MCJIT does not do), so it's likely to have better memory performance over all. - Lang. On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 8:07 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > +Lang for JIT things. > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 8:50 AM koffie drinker via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm building a runtime that can jit and execute code. I've followed the >> kaleidoscope tutorial and had a couple of questions. Basically I have a >> pre-compiler that compiles...

Hi folks, I have five imputed data sets and would like to apply the same recoding routines to each. I could do this sort of thing pretty easily in Stata using MIM, but I've decided to go cold turkey on other stats packages as a incentive for learning more about R. Most of the recoding is for nominal variables, like race, religion, urbanicity, and the like. So, for example, to recode race

Hi all, I have the following code: [use llvm to generate ir_func() ] in side the ir_func() there's a call to a native cpp function that throws an exception. (Just imagine changing the fibonacci example and calling a native c++ func that throws inside the fibonacci body) I can't seem to catch "foreign" exception or any exception using the following pseudo code: try { // cast

...nd deleting it? I'm using visual studio 2015 update1, and could not find any known issue regarding heaps. I'm at a point where I'm suspecting my compiler. But its weird that the same compiler works fine with 3.7.1 any ideas would be appreciated On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:10 AM, koffie drinker <gekkekoe at gmail.com> wrote: > > I recently upgraded from llvm 3.7.1 to a pre release of llvm (3.8.0rc2) in > order to test some issues regarding bug 24233. > After upgrading I starting to see heap corruption messages in vs 2015 sp1 > when my program exits. > "HEAP[C...

Hi, I'm experiencing a weird problem with llvm 3.7(rc2/rc3) that did not occur in llvm 3.6.2 I created a bug for it: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24521 I'm building a app where multiple code gen can happen in parallel. The documentation state that I need to use separate context. Each thread has it's own context. When code generating a constant number I use the *InContext()

Hi all, I'm building a runtime that can jit and execute code. I've followed the kaleidoscope tutorial and had a couple of questions. Basically I have a pre-compiler that compiles the code to cache objects. These cached objects are then persisted and used to reduce Jit compile time. 1. I took the approach of 1 execution engine with multiple modules (I'm not removing modules once