search for: dreamy

...ideal. The details here are going to be sensitive to the OS + target that I'm compiling for, right? So the effort here will be to understand and get right the calling convention details for each supported target, yes? Is there any current plan to change the way this works, or is it more of a dreamy cleanup item that maybe will get addressed some day? Appreciate the tip. On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 March 2016 at 21:48, Michael Nicolella via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Can someone he...

On 27 March 2016 at 21:48, Michael Nicolella via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Can someone help me understand why this detail needs to be understood by the frontend, Many of the backends can do automatic demotion to sret, but the front-end still needs to be aware of the issues (particularly around unions, since whether demotion is necessary can depend on more than just

...ras was uploaded in March of this year, and I haven't found whether the upstream vendor backported or sideported something into the latest distribution. [Yes, I'm STILL working on the workstation configuration. We're considering putting off triple-head support to cut costs, because the dreamy NVS510 cards are expensive. It's like a morass of quicksand sometimes.] Gracias y saludos, -G. -- Glenn Eychaner (geychaner at lco.cl) Telescope Systems Programmer, Las Campanas Observatory

This might well be OT; however, I thought I would ask anyway. Please keep in mind that the IMAP server is Dovecot. I have a friend who uses Becky Internet Mail <http://www.rimarts.co.jp/becky.htm> on a Windows system. There us an options under the configuration menu in Becky to create the trash folder on the server. It suggest ".trash" for the name. He is aware that I use Dovecot

I'm new to using LLVM and I've started work on a compiler for a language that can interface with C. One thing that caught me off guard was returning a struct from a function by value. It seems that when calling a C function I need to emit llvm ir that, in the caller, emits an alloca for the returned structure, and the C function signature should return void and take a first argument with

..., or if, it works). I think I've also seen mention of someone constructing the proper classes to pass to clang to have it emit the C ABI calls from their non-C language, although I'm not sure where I saw that. Is there any current plan to change the way this works, or is it more of a > dreamy cleanup item that maybe will get addressed some day? > I don't know of anybody working on changing the way this works. I'd personally love to work on cleaning it up, someday...but that's a wish, not a plan. Appreciate the tip. > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Tim Northov...

Well I finally broke down and got me one of those Intel iMacs and a copy of Textmate. It took me a bit to get use to Textmate but once I learned some of the shortcuts I was cruising. Mac OS X took very little time to get used to as I already had a decent *nix background. Up until this point I had been primarily on Windows. Some of the productivity highlights I''ve found: 1. My CPU

ok, while i was in the process of writing that last post, fletcher and john weighed in themselves. that's good. i can say some things that they can't, though, so i will. fletcher told you how multimarkdown is booming, and it was an impressive list. what you might not realize is, he _undersold_ it. it is even bigger than he described, and it's gonna _double_ in size in the next

Does anyone have any experience with production deployment of RoR on Dreamhost? Is it now stable enough? Any tips and tricks? Thanks a lot, Tom

Hi all, I have an issue I cannot solve myself and hope I can get some pointers here: I have a RCB design with 10 tree species each replicated 5 times in 5 blocks. Now, I classify all species according to their height in 3 groups (A, B and C). Now, I will choose 2 species of each group and take my measurements on 8 individuals per species, making sure to get at least one individual from each