search for: draft2

...iginal OggPCM was started by a person who really didn't > lnow what they were doing and wouldn't listen to or accept > input from anyone else. OggPCM2 was started to put and end to > the wiki edit war. OggPCM3 was purely a joke. >From the History of the "OggPCM" page, Draft2 was copied over to "OggPCM" in March 2006 and in October 2006 the "this is a draft" phrasing was removed. From that point, "OggPCM Draft2" was redundant and should have been deleted. " Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves " <justivo@gmail.com> wrote: ... > I have...

On 10/21/07, Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves <justivo@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/21/07, Martin Leese <martin.leese@stanfordalumni.org> wrote: > > Either "OggPCM" or "OggPCM Draft2" needs > > to be deleted. It really doesn't matter which, > > but I would suggest that "OggPCM" takes the > > big sleep. Just give time for me (or Sempo) to > > copy over recent changes. > > Alright. Just tell me when and what page to delete. No...

Hi, The Xiph Wiki contains the four pages: OggPCM OggPCM Draft1 (with Talk page) OggPCM Draft2 OggPCM Draft3 Can I suggest that this be reduced to just one (or maybe two) pages. I suggest this because somebody has started making changes to OggPCM Draft2. My guess is that this is not desirable. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese@stanfordalumni.org Web: http://memb...

...favour of draft 2. So what is "OggPCM"? I started this thread because I was puzzled why someone was changing a draft instead of the document itself. I started making changes to "OggPCM" back January. Maybe I was wrong to do that, and I should have been changing "OggPCM Draft2" instead. Having four versions of a document is very confusing to newcomers (like me), and I still suggest the number should be reduced. > > I suggest this because somebody has started making changes to OggPCM > > Draft2. > > That someone is me. Hi Sampo. If I had know it...

...tion (for instance, in ogg123). The problem is that nobody seems available to do it. If either Martin or Sampo would like to work on it, I believe nobody will oppose. CMML and Skeleton implementations are far more urgent right now, though. I have changed the main page in the XiphWiki to link to Draft2 as the "official" OggPCM. Hope that helps. -Ivo

...the cause). > As far as I know they are valid ogg bitstreams (ogginfo passes > them okay), even if the contents aren't proper media types. ok, I did know that oggz-validate only passes things which are known media types (currently it knows about Vorbis, Theora, Speex, Flac, CMML, OggPCM(draft2) and Skeleton). I guess this is because the original reason for oggz-validate was to check interleaving order, for which it needs to be able to interpret granulepos. It's probably worth adding an option to disable those checks and only check the bitstream packing. > On a completely irreleva...

...know they are valid ogg bitstreams (ogginfo passes >>them okay), even if the contents aren't proper media types. > > > ok, I did know that oggz-validate only passes things which are known > media types (currently it knows about Vorbis, Theora, Speex, Flac, CMML, > OggPCM(draft2) and Skeleton). I guess this is because the original > reason for oggz-validate was to check interleaving order, for which it > needs to be able to interpret granulepos. It's probably worth adding an > option to disable those checks and only check the bitstream packing. > > I...

...t; OggPCM Draft3 Draft 3 is obviously a joke. Draft 2 is what most of the people agreed upon the last time around, with the channel maps left unfinished. Draft 1 was abandoned by most people in favour of draft 2. > I suggest this because somebody has started making changes to OggPCM > Draft2. That someone is me. I've asked about this on-list a while back (http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/ogg-dev/2007-October/000644.html), and tried to spur some interest on #vorbis as well. Since nobody seemed too interested but didn't object to my suggestion of helping out either, I went ah...

I've placed a revision of the posting guide at http://pws.prserv.net/tap/posting-guide-draft2.html. (Posted there to make the HTML formatting easy to read.) I've tried to incorporate the suggestions people posted and mailed to me. Quite a few were of the form "too long, but you should add this..." :-) Brian Ripley, Jason Turner, Peter Dalgard, Patrick Burns, Frank Harrell,...

Hi, The Annodex Foundation is pleased to announce the general availability of the Annodex Media Validation Service, a free service that checks Web-accessible Ogg, CMML and Annodex media resources for conformance to Annodex and Xiph.Org specifications: http://validator.annodex.org/ Details about the operation of this service are available at: http://validator.annodex.org/about.html

Hi, The Annodex Foundation is pleased to announce the general availability of the Annodex Media Validation Service, a free service that checks Web-accessible Ogg, CMML and Annodex media resources for conformance to Annodex and Xiph.Org specifications: http://validator.annodex.org/ Details about the operation of this service are available at: http://validator.annodex.org/about.html

Hi, The Annodex Foundation is pleased to announce the general availability of the Annodex Media Validation Service, a free service that checks Web-accessible Ogg, CMML and Annodex media resources for conformance to Annodex and Xiph.Org specifications: http://validator.annodex.org/ Details about the operation of this service are available at: http://validator.annodex.org/about.html

Hi, The Annodex Foundation is pleased to announce the general availability of the Annodex Media Validation Service, a free service that checks Web-accessible Ogg, CMML and Annodex media resources for conformance to Annodex and Xiph.Org specifications: http://validator.annodex.org/ Details about the operation of this service are available at: http://validator.annodex.org/about.html

Hi, The Annodex Foundation is pleased to announce the general availability of the Annodex Media Validation Service, a free service that checks Web-accessible Ogg, CMML and Annodex media resources for conformance to Annodex and Xiph.Org specifications: http://validator.annodex.org/ Details about the operation of this service are available at: http://validator.annodex.org/about.html