Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "dqsvacratehtquali3_3".
Did you mean:
dqsvacratehtquali3_2
2010 Jan 22
2
Stata and R user GLM method
Hello people,
I am in the process of migrating from Stata to R and I would like to check
if my results are similar under the two softwares:
Here is my GLM command under R
nurse.model<-glm(pQSfteHT~dQSvacrateHTQuali3_2 + dQSvacrateHTQuali3_3 +
dQSvacrateHTQuali3_4 + dQSvacrateHTQuali3_5 + cluster_32 + cluster_33 +
cluster_34 ,family=binomial(link = "logit"))
and below the stata command
glm pQSfteHT dQSvacrateHTQuali3_2 dQSvacrateHTQuali3_3 dQSvacrateHTQuali3_4
dQSvacrateHTQuali3_5 cluster_32 cluster_33 cluster_34, link(prob...
2010 Jan 22
1
Sata and R users GLM methods translation
...check the reliability of the data under R. I have a
proportion variable as a dependent variable pQSfteHT . Independent variables
are dummies for two categorical variables called dQSvacrateHTQuali3 and
cluster_3. I am fitting a model with the Stata command below:
glm pQSfteHT dQSvacrateHTQuali3_2 dQSvacrateHTQuali3_3 dQSvacrateHTQuali3_4
dQSvacrateHTQuali3_5 cluster_32 cluster_33 cluster_34, link(probit)
family(binomial) robust
and the same (I expect) model with R with the command below:
nurse.model<-glm(pQSfteHT~dQSvacrateHTQuali3_2 + dQSvacrateHTQuali3_3 +
dQSvacrateHTQuali3_4 + dQSvacrateHTQuali3_5 + cl...