search for: dprob

...d it on my lowly windows box that is > years old and got it down to 88.07%. Does the Windows box have the same version of R on it? > The only thing I can think of is that there are quite a lot of cases > where a function is generated on the fly as in: > > eval(parse(t=paste("dprob <- > function(x,l,s){",dist.functions[2,][dist.functions[1,]==distn],"(x,l,s)}",sep=""))) This isn't very idiomatic. If you need dprob to call the function named in dist.functions[2,][dist.functions[1,]==distn], wouldn't it be easier for R to assign that fun...

...re Threadripper 1950X box so I was intending to use library parallel but I tried it on my lowly windows box that is years old and got it down to 88.07%. The only thing I can think of is that there are quite a lot of cases where a function is generated on the fly as in: eval(parse(t=paste("dprob <- function(x,l,s){",dist.functions[2,][dist.functions[1,]==distn],"(x,l,s)}",sep=""))) I haven't added the options to any of these. The highest time used by any of my functions is 0.05% - the rest is dominated by gc(). There may not be much point in parallising...