search for: dpool

...;m trying to configure shared mailboxes with ACL. My problem is FS layout. Our maildirs is completely outside of home dirs (home dirs is on pure SSD zpool, maildirs on separate HDD zpool). We are using checkpassword auth, which sets mailbox_location for each user. Layout is following: maildirs: /dpool/mail/maldirs/user-uuid/ home is: /dpool/mail/home/user-uuid/ index & control is under home: /dpool/mail/home/user-uuid/[index|control] the problem is how to specify path in NAMESPACE definition. I can use %% variables, but maildirs is not under home and also does not have "fixed&qu...

Hi all, just after sending a message to sunmanagers I realized that my question should rather have gone here. So sunmanagers please excus ethe double post: I have inherited a X4140 (8 SAS slots) and have just setup the system with Solaris 10 09. I first setup the system on a mirrored pool over the first two disks pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME

...ew_size=8192) at mempool-datastack.c:110 110 i_panic("pool_data_stack_realloc(): stack frame changed"); (gdb) list 105 /* @UNSAFE */ 106 if (new_size == 0 || new_size > SSIZE_T_MAX) 107 i_panic("Trying to allocate %"PRIuSIZE_T" bytes", new_size); 108 109 if (dpool->data_stack_frame != data_stack_frame) 110 i_panic("pool_data_stack_realloc(): stack frame changed"); 111 112 if (mem == NULL) 113 return pool_data_stack_malloc(pool, new_size); 114 (gdb) p dpool $18 = (struct datastack_pool *) 0x80c7788 (gdb) p *dpool $19 = {pool = {get_name =...

...Status ------------------------------------------------------ c0t0d0 IM OK c0t0d0 OK c0t1d0 OK c0t2d0 IM OK c0t2d0 OK c0t3d0 OK # zpool status -x pool: dpool state: FAULTED status: One or more devices could not be opened. There are insufficient replicas for the pool to continue functioning. action: Attach the missing device and online it using ''zpool online''. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-D3 scrub: none request...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, Peter Hodur wrote: > > maildirs: > > /dpool/mail/maldirs/user-uuid/ > > > home is: > > /dpool/mail/home/user-uuid/ > > > index & control is under home: > > /dpool/mail/home/user-uuid/[index|control] > > > the problem is how to specify path in NAMESPACE definition. I can use %% > variables, but ma...

...malloc>, free = 0x70290 <pool_data_stack_free>, realloc = 0x702bc <pool_data_stack_realloc>, clear = 0x7036c <pool_data_stack_clear>, get_max_easy_alloc_size = 0x70374 <pool_data_stack_get_max_easy_alloc_size>, alloconly_pool = 1, datastack_pool = 1} (gdb) print dpool No symbol "dpool" in current context. (gdb) down #4 0x00070304 in pool_data_stack_realloc (pool=Variable "pool" is not available. ) at mempool-datastack.c:112 112 i_panic("pool_data_stack_realloc(): stack frame changed"); (gdb) print dpool $6 = (st...

I''d like to replace/upgrade two 500GB disks in RaidZ2 vdev with 1TB disks, but I have some preliminary questions/concerns before trying ''zfs replace dpool ?'' Will ZFS permit this replacement? Will ZFS use the extra space in a heterogeneous RaidZ2 vdev, or is the size limited by the smallest disk in the vdev? Thanks in advance, Vizzini The system is currently running snv_98, zfs on disk version of 10, and eight 500GB disks in the followin...

Hi all I''m seeing some rather bad resilver times for a pool of WD Green drives (I know, bad drives, but leave that). Does resilver go through the whole pool or just the VDEV in question? -- Vennlige hilsener / Best regards roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (+47) 97542685 roy at karlsbakk.net http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ -- I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres

.../rdsk/c0t0d0s0) as the member driver of rpool. Infact, solaris2 partition can be more then one in each Hard Disk, so we also can use the RAW driver like : c0t0d0p1 (/dev/rdsk/c0t0d0p1) ,c0t0d0p2 (/dev/rdsk/c0t0d0p2) as the member driver to create a new zpool : Morpho at egoodbrac1:~# zpool create dpool raidz c0t0d0p1,c0t1d0,c0t2d0 This command can successful create a new raidz pool named dpool and c0t0d0p1 means the RAW drive of the first solaris2 partition of the system disk (c0t0d0),c0t1d0 and c0t2d0 is another 2 RAW disk. But ,If you understand , in logic the member driver of rpool c0t0d0s0...

...ps with seven 2TB drives each. The root fs is on a pair of X25M (gen 1) SSDs and another set of similar SSDs be used for Zil and L2ARC (mirror for zil and stripe for l2arc). Is this correct behaviour? according to the zpool status, opensolaris is supposed to use something like 14 days to scrub the dpool... roy NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM dpool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0...

....20 with ext3 debugging. Set debug level to 3--no lockup. While writing this, reran test with debug level 2--locks up. I'm going to build with the magic sysreq key and see if any further elucidation is possible. -- David Poole "Setting a bologna sandwich on fire does dpoole at mbuf dot com not constitute cooking." - Get Fuzzy

...uploading all my data to my server and the space used is much more than what i''m uploading; Documents = 147MB Videos = 11G Software= 1.4G By my calculations, that equals 12.547T, yet zpool list is showing 21G as being allocated; NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT dpool 27.2T 21.2G 27.2T 0% 1.00x ONLINE - It doesn''t look like any snapshots have been taken, according to zfs list -t snapshot. I''ve read about the ''copies'' parameter but I didn''t specify this when creating filesystems and I guess the default is 1?...

Hi all, I have a 5 drive RAIDZ volume with data that I''d like to recover. The long story runs roughly: 1) The volume was running fine under FreeBSD on motherboard SATA controllers. 2) Two drives were moved to a HP P411 SAS/SATA controller 3) I *think* the HP controllers wrote some volume information to the end of each disk (hence no more ZFS labels 2,3) 4) In its "auto

...s1 and c11d0s1 is the SLOG mirror, even though zpool iostat doesn''t show it (zfs status does). root at urd:~# zpool iostat -v capacity operations bandwidth pool alloc free read write read write ------------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- dpool 38.7T 20.9T 302 39 17.3M 2.20M raidz2 12.1T 552G 81 3 4.72M 205K c7t2d0 - - 34 2 1.18M 41.5K c7t3d0 - - 34 2 1.18M 41.5K c7t4d0 - - 33 2 1.18M 41.5K c7t5d0 - -...

using latest auto build didn't help. this happens only with a specific account. # doveadm -o imapc_user=----- at domain.com -o imapc_password=---- backup -u =----- at domain.com -R imapc: dsync(---- at domain.com): Panic: pool_data_stack_realloc(): stack frame changed dsync(---- at domain.com): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x4209a) [0xb762b09a] ->

Hi All, I am looking at ZFS and I get that they call it RAIDZ which is similar to RAID 5, but what about RAID 10? Isn''t a RAID 10 setup better for data protection? So if I have 8 x 1.5tb drives, wouldn''t I: - mirror drive 1 and 5 - mirror drive 2 and 6 - mirror drive 3 and 7 - mirror drive 4 and 8 Then stripe 1,2,3,4 Then stripe 5,6,7,8 How does one do this with ZFS?