Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "dp_mst_cap".
Did you mean:
dp_mstm_cap
2020 Aug 11
0
[RFC 09/20] drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_has_mst()
...l_dp)
return true;
}
-static bool
-intel_dp_sink_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
-{
- u8 mstm_cap;
-
- if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < 0x12)
- return false;
-
- if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &mstm_cap) != 1)
- return false;
-
- return mstm_cap & DP_MST_CAP;
-}
-
static bool
intel_dp_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
@@ -4720,7 +4706,7 @@ intel_dp_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
return i915->params.enable_dp_mst &&
intel_dp->can_mst &&
- intel_dp_sink_can_mst(intel_dp);
+ drm_dp_has_mst(&intel_dp->aux, in...
2020 Aug 25
0
[RFC v4 09/20] drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_has_mst()
...l_dp)
return true;
}
-static bool
-intel_dp_sink_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
-{
- u8 mstm_cap;
-
- if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < 0x12)
- return false;
-
- if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &mstm_cap) != 1)
- return false;
-
- return mstm_cap & DP_MST_CAP;
-}
-
static bool
intel_dp_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
@@ -4720,7 +4706,7 @@ intel_dp_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
return i915->params.enable_dp_mst &&
intel_dp->can_mst &&
- intel_dp_sink_can_mst(intel_dp);
+ drm_dp_has_mst(&intel_dp->aux, in...
2020 Aug 26
0
[PATCH v5 09/20] drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_read_mst_cap()
...se otherwise
+ */
+bool drm_dp_read_mst_cap(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
+ const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
+{
+ u8 mstm_cap;
+
+ if (dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_12)
+ return false;
+
+ if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &mstm_cap) != 1)
+ return false;
+
+ return mstm_cap & DP_MST_CAP;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_read_mst_cap);
+
/**
* drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst() - Set the MST state for a topology manager
* @mgr: manager to set state for
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index 79c27f91f42c0..4c7314b7a84e4 10064...
2020 Aug 11
0
[RFC 10/20] drm/nouveau/kms: Use new drm_dp_has_mst() helper for checking MST caps
...d;
}
- if (nouveau_mst)
+ if (nouveau_mst) {
mstm = outp->dp.mstm;
-
- if (mstm) {
- if (dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] >= DP_DPCD_REV_12) {
- ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &tmp);
- if (ret < 0)
- return connector_status_disconnected;
-
- mstm->can_mst = !!(tmp & DP_MST_CAP);
- } else {
- mstm->can_mst = false;
- }
+ if (mstm)
+ mstm->can_mst = drm_dp_has_mst(aux, dpcd);
}
return connector_status_connected;
--
2.26.2
2018 Aug 09
2
[PATCH 0/2] Fix display detection issues with P50-P52 docks
This fixes some annoying issues on the P50-P52 with displays not being
detected if they aren't plugged in at boot, and sometimes even when they
are plugged in at boot.
See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477182
Lyude Paul (2):
drm/nouveau: Only write DP_MSTM_CTRL when needed
drm/nouveau: Reset MST branching unit before enabling
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 65
2020 Aug 25
22
[RFC v4 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this
code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers.
Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while.
Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes,
we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since
this was originally written. Additionally, the code
2020 Aug 11
29
[RFC 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks -
most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed
elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this
code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers.
Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while.
Other then the occasional runtime PM
2020 Aug 26
23
[PATCH v5 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this
code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers.
Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while.
Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes,
we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since
this was originally written. Additionally, the code
2020 Aug 20
22
[RFC v2 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks -
most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed
elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this
code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers.
Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while.
Other then the occasional runtime PM