search for: dp_mst_cap

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "dp_mst_cap".

Did you mean: dp_mstm_cap
2020 Aug 11
0
[RFC 09/20] drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_has_mst()
...l_dp) return true; } -static bool -intel_dp_sink_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) -{ - u8 mstm_cap; - - if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < 0x12) - return false; - - if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &mstm_cap) != 1) - return false; - - return mstm_cap & DP_MST_CAP; -} - static bool intel_dp_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) { @@ -4720,7 +4706,7 @@ intel_dp_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) return i915->params.enable_dp_mst && intel_dp->can_mst && - intel_dp_sink_can_mst(intel_dp); + drm_dp_has_mst(&intel_dp->aux, in...
2020 Aug 25
0
[RFC v4 09/20] drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_has_mst()
...l_dp) return true; } -static bool -intel_dp_sink_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) -{ - u8 mstm_cap; - - if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < 0x12) - return false; - - if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &mstm_cap) != 1) - return false; - - return mstm_cap & DP_MST_CAP; -} - static bool intel_dp_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) { @@ -4720,7 +4706,7 @@ intel_dp_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) return i915->params.enable_dp_mst && intel_dp->can_mst && - intel_dp_sink_can_mst(intel_dp); + drm_dp_has_mst(&intel_dp->aux, in...
2020 Aug 26
0
[PATCH v5 09/20] drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_read_mst_cap()
...se otherwise + */ +bool drm_dp_read_mst_cap(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, + const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE]) +{ + u8 mstm_cap; + + if (dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_12) + return false; + + if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &mstm_cap) != 1) + return false; + + return mstm_cap & DP_MST_CAP; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_read_mst_cap); + /** * drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst() - Set the MST state for a topology manager * @mgr: manager to set state for diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c index 79c27f91f42c0..4c7314b7a84e4 10064...
2020 Aug 11
0
[RFC 10/20] drm/nouveau/kms: Use new drm_dp_has_mst() helper for checking MST caps
...d; } - if (nouveau_mst) + if (nouveau_mst) { mstm = outp->dp.mstm; - - if (mstm) { - if (dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] >= DP_DPCD_REV_12) { - ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &tmp); - if (ret < 0) - return connector_status_disconnected; - - mstm->can_mst = !!(tmp & DP_MST_CAP); - } else { - mstm->can_mst = false; - } + if (mstm) + mstm->can_mst = drm_dp_has_mst(aux, dpcd); } return connector_status_connected; -- 2.26.2
2018 Aug 09
2
[PATCH 0/2] Fix display detection issues with P50-P52 docks
This fixes some annoying issues on the P50-P52 with displays not being detected if they aren't plugged in at boot, and sometimes even when they are plugged in at boot. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477182 Lyude Paul (2): drm/nouveau: Only write DP_MSTM_CTRL when needed drm/nouveau: Reset MST branching unit before enabling drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 65
2020 Aug 25
22
[RFC v4 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code
2020 Aug 11
29
[RFC 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks - most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM
2020 Aug 26
23
[PATCH v5 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code
2020 Aug 20
22
[RFC v2 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks - most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM