search for: dp_link_status_size

Hi all, I've frustrated myself the last few days yelling at our link training code. Comparing the i915 code to radeon and nouveau I've noticed the lack of a nice set of dp helper functions. So I've started to extract a few. There's lots more that we can do I think (link configuration selection, the i2c over aux retry stuff which diverges already between i915 and radeon, maybe

...cd_writeb(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, > return drm_dp_dpcd_write(aux, offset, &value, 1); > } > > +int drm_dp_read_dpcd_caps(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, > + u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE]); > + > int drm_dp_dpcd_read_link_status(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, > u8 status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE]); > > -- > 2.26.2 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS

...607,9 @@ static inline ssize_t drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, return drm_dp_dpcd_write(aux, offset, &value, 1); } +int drm_dp_read_dpcd_caps(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, + u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE]); + int drm_dp_dpcd_read_link_status(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, u8 status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE]); -- 2.26.2

To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks - most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM

Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code

To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks - most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM

Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code