search for: dp_get_sink_count

...gt; index 863e0babc1903..67ad05eb05b7e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c > @@ -736,6 +736,28 @@ bool drm_dp_has_sink_count(struct drm_connector *connector, > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_has_sink_count); > > +/** > + * drm_dp_get_sink_count() - Retrieve the sink count for a given sink >From the department of bikeshedding... Should we have a naming scheme where it's obvious whether a function will do DPCD access, or just shuffle existing data? For example, drm_dp_read_foo() for anything with DPCD access vs. drm_dp_get_foo() o...

..._helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c index 863e0babc1903..67ad05eb05b7e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c @@ -736,6 +736,28 @@ bool drm_dp_has_sink_count(struct drm_connector *connector, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_has_sink_count); +/** + * drm_dp_get_sink_count() - Retrieve the sink count for a given sink + * @aux: The DP AUX channel to use + * + * Returns: The current sink count reported by @aux, or a negative error code + * otherwise. + */ +int drm_dp_get_sink_count(struct drm_dp_aux *aux) +{ + u8 count; + int ret; + + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_SI...

..._helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c index 05bb47e589731..0ff2959c8f8e8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c @@ -722,6 +722,26 @@ bool drm_dp_has_sink_count(struct drm_connector *connector, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_has_sink_count); +/** + * drm_dp_get_sink_count() - Retrieve the sink count for a given sink + * @aux: The DP AUX channel to use + * + * Returns: The current sink count reported by @aux, or a negative error code + * otherwise. + */ +int drm_dp_get_sink_count(struct drm_dp_aux *aux) +{ + u8 count; + int ret; + + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_SI...

...> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c > > @@ -736,6 +736,28 @@ bool drm_dp_has_sink_count(struct drm_connector > > *connector, > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_has_sink_count); > > > > +/** > > + * drm_dp_get_sink_count() - Retrieve the sink count for a given sink > > From the department of bikeshedding... > > Should we have a naming scheme where it's obvious whether a function > will do DPCD access, or just shuffle existing data? > > For example, drm_dp_read_foo() for anything with DPC...

...nouveau_connector_detect() drm/nouveau/kms: Only use hpd_work for reprobing in HPD paths drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_downstream_read_info() drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Use downstream DP clock limits for mode validation drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_has_sink_count() drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_get_sink_count() drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Add support for DP_SINK_COUNT drm/nouveau/kms: Don't change EDID when it hasn't actually changed drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_read_dpcd_caps() drm/nouveau/kms: Start using drm_dp_read_dpcd_caps() drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 167 +++++++++++...

...nouveau_connector_detect() drm/nouveau/kms: Only use hpd_work for reprobing in HPD paths drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_downstream_read_info() drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Use downstream DP clock limits for mode validation drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_has_sink_count() drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_get_sink_count() drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Add support for DP_SINK_COUNT drm/nouveau/kms: Don't change EDID when it hasn't actually changed drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_read_dpcd_caps() drm/nouveau/kms: Start using drm_dp_read_dpcd_caps() drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 150 ++++++++++...

...nouveau_connector_detect() drm/nouveau/kms: Only use hpd_work for reprobing in HPD paths drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_downstream_read_info() drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Use downstream DP clock limits for mode validation drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_has_sink_count() drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_get_sink_count() drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Add support for DP_SINK_COUNT drm/nouveau/kms: Don't change EDID when it hasn't actually changed drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_read_dpcd_caps() drm/nouveau/kms: Start using drm_dp_read_dpcd_caps() drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 167 +++++++++++...

Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code