Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "dp_dpcd_rev_12".
2020 Aug 11
0
[RFC 10/20] drm/nouveau/kms: Use new drm_dp_has_mst() helper for checking MST caps
...== DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE && dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV]) {
@@ -56,19 +55,10 @@ nouveau_dp_probe_dpcd(struct nouveau_connector *nv_connector,
return connector_status_disconnected;
}
- if (nouveau_mst)
+ if (nouveau_mst) {
mstm = outp->dp.mstm;
-
- if (mstm) {
- if (dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] >= DP_DPCD_REV_12) {
- ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &tmp);
- if (ret < 0)
- return connector_status_disconnected;
-
- mstm->can_mst = !!(tmp & DP_MST_CAP);
- } else {
- mstm->can_mst = false;
- }
+ if (mstm)
+ mstm->can_mst = drm_dp_has_mst(aux, dpcd);
}
return...
2020 Aug 11
0
[RFC 09/20] drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_has_mst()
...el to use
+ * @dpcd: A cached copy of the DPCD capabilities for this sink
+ *
+ * Returns: %True if the sink supports MST, %false otherwise
+ */
+static inline bool
+drm_dp_has_mst(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
+ const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
+{
+ u8 mstm_cap;
+
+ if (dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_12)
+ return false;
+
+ if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &mstm_cap) != 1)
+ return false;
+
+ return !!(mstm_cap & DP_MST_CAP);
+}
+
#endif
--
2.26.2
2020 Aug 25
0
[RFC v4 09/20] drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_has_mst()
...el to use
+ * @dpcd: A cached copy of the DPCD capabilities for this sink
+ *
+ * Returns: %True if the sink supports MST, %false otherwise
+ */
+static inline bool
+drm_dp_has_mst(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
+ const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
+{
+ u8 mstm_cap;
+
+ if (dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_12)
+ return false;
+
+ if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &mstm_cap) != 1)
+ return false;
+
+ return !!(mstm_cap & DP_MST_CAP);
+}
+
#endif
--
2.26.2
2020 Aug 26
0
[PATCH v5 09/20] drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_read_mst_cap()
...e DP AUX channel to use
+ * @dpcd: A cached copy of the DPCD capabilities for this sink
+ *
+ * Returns: %True if the sink supports MST, %false otherwise
+ */
+bool drm_dp_read_mst_cap(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
+ const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
+{
+ u8 mstm_cap;
+
+ if (dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_12)
+ return false;
+
+ if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &mstm_cap) != 1)
+ return false;
+
+ return mstm_cap & DP_MST_CAP;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_read_mst_cap);
+
/**
* drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst() - Set the MST state for a topology manager
* @mgr: manager to set state fo...
2020 Aug 11
29
[RFC 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks -
most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed
elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this
code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers.
Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while.
Other then the occasional runtime PM
2020 Aug 25
22
[RFC v4 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this
code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers.
Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while.
Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes,
we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since
this was originally written. Additionally, the code
2020 Aug 26
23
[PATCH v5 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this
code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers.
Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while.
Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes,
we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since
this was originally written. Additionally, the code
2020 Aug 20
22
[RFC v2 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks -
most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed
elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this
code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers.
Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while.
Other then the occasional runtime PM