search for: dp_dpcd_rev_12

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "dp_dpcd_rev_12".

2020 Aug 11
0
[RFC 10/20] drm/nouveau/kms: Use new drm_dp_has_mst() helper for checking MST caps
...== DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE && dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV]) { @@ -56,19 +55,10 @@ nouveau_dp_probe_dpcd(struct nouveau_connector *nv_connector, return connector_status_disconnected; } - if (nouveau_mst) + if (nouveau_mst) { mstm = outp->dp.mstm; - - if (mstm) { - if (dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] >= DP_DPCD_REV_12) { - ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &tmp); - if (ret < 0) - return connector_status_disconnected; - - mstm->can_mst = !!(tmp & DP_MST_CAP); - } else { - mstm->can_mst = false; - } + if (mstm) + mstm->can_mst = drm_dp_has_mst(aux, dpcd); } return...
2020 Aug 11
0
[RFC 09/20] drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_has_mst()
...el to use + * @dpcd: A cached copy of the DPCD capabilities for this sink + * + * Returns: %True if the sink supports MST, %false otherwise + */ +static inline bool +drm_dp_has_mst(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, + const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE]) +{ + u8 mstm_cap; + + if (dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_12) + return false; + + if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &mstm_cap) != 1) + return false; + + return !!(mstm_cap & DP_MST_CAP); +} + #endif -- 2.26.2
2020 Aug 25
0
[RFC v4 09/20] drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_has_mst()
...el to use + * @dpcd: A cached copy of the DPCD capabilities for this sink + * + * Returns: %True if the sink supports MST, %false otherwise + */ +static inline bool +drm_dp_has_mst(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, + const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE]) +{ + u8 mstm_cap; + + if (dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_12) + return false; + + if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &mstm_cap) != 1) + return false; + + return !!(mstm_cap & DP_MST_CAP); +} + #endif -- 2.26.2
2020 Aug 26
0
[PATCH v5 09/20] drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_read_mst_cap()
...e DP AUX channel to use + * @dpcd: A cached copy of the DPCD capabilities for this sink + * + * Returns: %True if the sink supports MST, %false otherwise + */ +bool drm_dp_read_mst_cap(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, + const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE]) +{ + u8 mstm_cap; + + if (dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_12) + return false; + + if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &mstm_cap) != 1) + return false; + + return mstm_cap & DP_MST_CAP; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_read_mst_cap); + /** * drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst() - Set the MST state for a topology manager * @mgr: manager to set state fo...
2020 Aug 11
29
[RFC 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks - most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM
2020 Aug 25
22
[RFC v4 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code
2020 Aug 26
23
[PATCH v5 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code
2020 Aug 20
22
[RFC v2 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks - most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM