Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "dozzie".
Did you mean:
ozzie
2013 Jan 26
3
rsyncssl
Hi,
i`m wondering - can't THIS one
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=rsync-patches.git;a=blob;f=openssl-support.diff
be completely replaced with THIS one ?
http://dozzie.jarowit.net/trac/wiki/RsyncSSL
http://dozzie.jarowit.net/git?p=rsync-ssl.git;a=tree
Isn`t RsyncSSL (wrap rsync with stunnel via stdin/out) the better solution ? (as it is using a mature external program for the SSL stuff)
regards
roland
2014 Dec 03
4
Aw: Re: encrypted rsyncd - why was it never implemented?
...sl to rsync adds quite some complexity and also increases maintenance work.
for some time there is a ssl patch in the contrib directory, but i`m curious why nobody is aware of rsyncssl, which is not a perfect but quite some elegant solution to support wrapping rsyncd with ssl via stunnel:
http://dozzie.jarowit.net/trac/wiki/RsyncSSL
https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=commit;h=70d4a945f7d1ab1aca2c3ca8535240fad4bdf06b
regards
roland
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 03. Dezember 2014 um 19:19 Uhr
> Von: "Kevin Korb" <kmk at sanitarium.net>
> An: rsync at lists.samba.org
> Betr...
2014 Dec 03
1
Aw: Re: Re: encrypted rsyncd - why was it never implemented?
...work.
> >
> > for some time there is a ssl patch in the contrib directory, but
> > i`m curious why nobody is aware of rsyncssl, which is not a perfect
> > but quite some elegant solution to support wrapping rsyncd with ssl
> > via stunnel:
> >
> > http://dozzie.jarowit.net/trac/wiki/RsyncSSL
> > https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=commit;h=70d4a945f7d1ab1aca2c3ca8535240fad4bdf06b
> >
> > regards roland
> >
> >
> >
> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 03. Dezember 2014 um 19:19 Uhr Von: "Kevin
> >> Korb&...
2013 Nov 22
2
[Bug 1890] TLS for rsync protocol
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1890
--- Comment #11 from roland <devzero at web.de> 2013-11-22 22:21:30 UTC ---
from the rsync 3.1.0 release notes :
Rsync now comes packaged with an rsync-ssl helper script that can be
used to contact a remote rsync daemon using a piped-stunnel command.
It also includes an stunnel config file to run the server side to
support
2014 Dec 03
0
Aw: Re: encrypted rsyncd - why was it never implemented?
...and also increases maintenance
> work.
>
> for some time there is a ssl patch in the contrib directory, but
> i`m curious why nobody is aware of rsyncssl, which is not a perfect
> but quite some elegant solution to support wrapping rsyncd with ssl
> via stunnel:
>
> http://dozzie.jarowit.net/trac/wiki/RsyncSSL
> https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=commit;h=70d4a945f7d1ab1aca2c3ca8535240fad4bdf06b
>
> regards roland
>
>
>
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 03. Dezember 2014 um 19:19 Uhr Von: "Kevin
>> Korb" <kmk at sanitarium.net> An:...
2014 Dec 03
4
encrypted rsyncd - why was it never implemented?
rsync in daemon mode is very powerful, yet it comes with one big
disadvantage: data is sent in plain.
The workarounds are not really satisfying:
- use VPN - one needs to set up an extra service, not always possible
- use stunnel - as above
- use SSH - is not as powerful as in daemon mode (i.e. read only access,
chroot, easy way of adding/modifying users and modules etc.)
Why was encrypted