search for: doxygenation

Chris Lattner wrote: >> I tried generating the docs myself ... doxygen simply refuses to >> create pages for classes defined in anonymous namespaces in cpp files. >> I enabled options such as EXTRACT_ALL, EXTRACT_PRIVATE and >> EXTRACT_LOCAL, but no luck. How is the publicly available >> documentation generated? > > They are generated from the Makefile in

Hi, The docs available on illuvium.com are different from the one's present in the doxygen tarball on the same page ... can the tarball be generated from the same docs as the browseable version? I considered crawling the illuvium.com site, but it would be better to simply have a tarball available. I tried generating the docs myself ... doxygen simply refuses to create pages for classes

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Sameer D. Sahasrabuddhe wrote: > The docs available on illuvium.com are different from the one's present in > the doxygen tarball on the same page ... can the tarball be generated from > the same docs as the browseable version? I considered crawling the > illuvium.com site, but it would be better to simply have a tarball available. Agreed. I have been

Hi folks, Hope this is not a silly question. But it bothers me when I am thinking about it. My question is: 1. In the implementation of serverSplitPHINodes(), why it only checks the first PHI node for possible multiple inputs from outside the region to extract. There could be more than one PHI nodes in the header block, and the code only checks the first one. I don't quite get it.

Installed version of doxygen (stock CentOS 5.9): Name : doxygen Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 1.4.7 Vendor: CentOS Release : 2 Build Date: Mon 11 Jun 2012 04:50:22 AM EDT Install Date: Fri 07 Jun 2013 12:14:55 PM EDT Build Host: builder10.centos.org Group : Development/Tools

Thanks Duncan, Yes, it is a ConstantExpr! Thank you! Now trying to find a clue in ConstantExpr's functions to get that string :-) Regards, Welson On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Welson Sun, > > > Hi, if I have some LLVM code like this: > > > > @.str = private unnamed_addr constant [7 x i8]

Hi All, I am going to clean up those doxygen links on LLVM Programmer’s Manual [1], some are lost and some are too old. However, I am confused on which doxygen link I should pick up. I see there are mutiple links exist on LLVM web site for LLVM classes. Take class Statistic as example, there are: - http://llvm.org/doxygen/Statistic_8h-source.html (the oldest one, I believe it's

It seems the mail you are referring to never made the list: it's not in the archives and not in my mailbox. Take a look here: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2012-December/thread.html It's probably still waiting for moderation. On 07-01-13 17:07, Olivier BLIN wrote: > On 29/12/2012 00:06, Olivier Blin wrote: >> When building outside of the source tree, the Doxyfile

Thanks for the info, Philip. I will update the LLVM Programmer’s Manual first. Regards, chenwj Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Homepage: https://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj 2017-04-02 18:11 GMT+08:00 Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com>: > Hi chenwj, > > http://llvm.org/doxygen/Statistic_8h_source.html is the correct one. The > other two are remnants from older doxygen deployments.

When building outside of the source tree, the Doxyfile needs to be generated in the build tree and should point to the proper paths for include directories and html footer. The generated api files to install should also be taken from the build tree instead of the source tree. --- configure.ac | 1 + doc/Doxyfile | 1220 --------------------------------------------------

When building outside of the source tree, the Doxyfile needs to be generated in the build tree and should point to the proper paths for include directories and html footer. The generated api files to install should also be taken from the build tree instead of the source tree. --- configure.ac | 1 + doc/Doxyfile | 1220 --------------------------------------------------

Hi all, I'm having a bit of trouble with the online doxygen documentation. As far is I know, it should reflect current svn trunk. However, it seems out of date. For example, the ExtractValueInst [1] is not a UnaryInstruction yet and still takes Value* as indices. To add to the confusing, the mainpage [2] says it is documentation version "2.1svn" which seems even more weird. What

Would it be helpful to be able to use Doxygen on TableGen .td files?

We just had some discussion in the IRC channel and wondered whether it would be a good idea to enable one of the doxygen autobrief options for llvm: JAVADOC_AUTOBRIEF If the JAVADOC_AUTOBRIEF tag is set to YES then doxygen will interpret the first line (until the first dot) of a Javadoc-style comment as the brief description. If set to NO, the Javadoc-style will behave just like regular Qt-style

On Apr 30, 2010, at 7:54 AM, mike-m wrote: > Hi, I'm working on a patch to overhaul docs+doxygen builds for both llvm and clang source trees. > > Here's a sample of what it looks like for class clang::driver::Action (sorry, llvm API docs are a bigger set so only clang has been posted at this free webhost). Basically the output is a bump to latest doxygen plus custom css; the

Hi, I found that http://llvm.org/doxygen seems to be out-of-date. The footer shows that the files are regenerated everyday. I guess that the input repository for doxygen has not been updated for a while. For example, http://llvm.org/doxygen/namespacellvm.html#adeb6bbe8b1bed333ee7608e1939153c0 It says llvm::ParseBitcodeFile() has following prototype: Module *ParseBitcodeFile(MemoryBuffer

Hi, I'm working on a patch to overhaul docs+doxygen builds for both llvm and clang source trees. Here's a sample of what it looks like for class clang::driver::Action (sorry, llvm API docs are a bigger set so only clang has been posted at this free webhost). Basically the output is a bump to latest doxygen plus custom css; the wins (IMHO) are the new style doesn't waste so much

Getting rid of all the distracting \brief comment markers in our header files would be great! Note that we will also need to update our coding standards to no longer encourage them then. -- adrian > On May 3, 2015, at 9:08 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote: > > Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de> writes: >> We just had some discussion in the IRC

Hi llvmdev, I've noticed that there is no unary operator in LLVM. For unary operator such as Neg or Or operator, the IR builder just creates a binary operation with one dummy operand, 01823 <http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1BinaryOperator.html#a073c092ce74a122e898e435e60e84599> BinaryOperator <http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1BinaryOperator.html>

Dear Sir or Ms: My OS is ubuntu 12.04(AMD64). I have installed TexLive 2012, Graphviz 2.26.3, doxygen 1.7.6.1 without the dependence doxygen-latex.The version of LLVM I am working on is 3.2. My configure script is the following: ../llvm-3.2/configure --prefix=/home/me/mywork/sca/llvm/llvm-install2 --enable-targets=host-only --enable-debug-runtime --enable-assertions --enable-doxygen