search for: dowson

...rectory make[2]: *** [libgcc/./_muldi3.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... xgcc: installation problem, cannot exec `gccas': No such file or directory make[2]: *** [libgcc/./_negdi2.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [libgcc.a] Error 2 make: *** [all-gcc] Error 2 Best regards, Elvis Dowson -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20081229/32a80559/attachment.html>

..., 2008, at 6:38 PM, Nico wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure, but I think you should do point 'e' first - unless you > want to implement 'a' to 'd' first for 1.5 and then again for 2.4. > > Best regards, > Nico > > On Dec 29, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote: > >> Hi, >> Would anyone happen to know if there are any efforts underway >> at enhancing the Trident compiler? >> >> Some of the things that I would like to add to the Trident compiler >> are : >> >> a. Support for compiling multiple...

...ree-nested.c:1846: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../../src/gcc/tree-nested.c:1846: error: for each function it appears in.) make[2]: *** [tree-nested.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-gcc] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 How can I resolve this error? Best regards, Elvis Dowson -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20081229/99460c93/attachment.html>

...s, I just realized this. I am going through the steps now. So, you're saying that Trident will not work with llvm-2.4? If I have to use llvm-1.5, which is the corresponding C front end? I couldn't locate the C front end package on the Trident Compiler website. Best regards, Elvis Dowson On Dec 29, 2008, at 2:43 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, Elvis > >> $ ../src/configure --program-prefix=llvm- --disable-bootstrap >> --enable-checking --enable-languages=c,c++ > You haven't configured llvm-gcc properly. Please do read readme.llvm > file. >...

Hi, I'm not sure, but I think you should do point 'e' first - unless you want to implement 'a' to 'd' first for 1.5 and then again for 2.4. Best regards, Nico On Dec 29, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote: > Hi, > Would anyone happen to know if there are any efforts underway > at enhancing the Trident compiler? > > Some of the things that I would like to add to the Trident compiler > are : > > a. Support for compiling multiple C functions in an input file > b...

2008/12/28 Elvis Dowson <elvis.dowson at mac.com> > Where can I get gccas ? I am running Mac OS X 10.5.6 and I get the > following error: > gccas is one of the LLVM tools; you have to build them before building llvm-gcc and you should configure llvm-gcc with the --enable-llvm=[...] flag unless the LLVM to...

Hi, Would anyone happen to know if there are any efforts underway at enhancing the Trident compiler? Some of the things that I would like to add to the Trident compiler are : a. Support for compiling multiple C functions in an input file b. Support for parameter passing c. Support for functions returning results d. Support for a C++ front end, and C++ objects e. Updating the trident

Hello, Elvis > $ ../src/configure --program-prefix=llvm- --disable-bootstrap > --enable-checking --enable-languages=c,c++ You haven't configured llvm-gcc properly. Please do read readme.llvm file. However, afair, Trident was LLVM 1.5-based, and it will require massive rewrite to use LLVM 2.x (bytecode format was also changed) -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of

Hi, Elvis > So, you're saying that Trident will not work with llvm-2.4? No idea, but most probably - yes, it won't work. > If I have to use llvm-1.5, which is the corresponding C front end? I > couldn't locate the C front end package on the Trident Compiler website. I think you might try to grab some old source package from llvm-1.5 days. However, it was pre gcc-3.4-based

Hi I am conducting 2-sample Kolmogorov Smirnov tests for my Masters project to determine if two independant tree populations have the same size-class distribution or not. The trees have been placed into size-class categories based on their basal diameters. Once I started running the stats on my data, I got confused with the results. Just to show an example of what I was testing I ran stats