search for: downsize

L.S., I would like to add a downsized image to a pdf file and got stuck on the code to use. My goal is to open a pdf device, add a plot, add the downsized image, and then close the pdf device. Making the downsized image is easy using png(), png(file="x.png", width = 600, height = 600, units="px", pointsiz...

Hi, FWIW this recent project of mine has somewhat similar goals: https://github.com/r-hub/r-minimal Gabor On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 2:40 PM <dmedri at gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear folks, > > I'm testing a downsized R build - in features and obviously sizes - > for a "modern" flat deployment (eg. like python virtualenv, just to > name one). > > Questions: > > 1) Is flat style possible? > 2) With this setup, R and packages can be installed/updated? > 3) The directory can be ea...

I''m using ffmpeg to downsize mp3s and it works great. The only problem I am having is that if the original mp3 has meta information (e.g. album art), its lost during the conversion. Does anyone know a way around this? Thanks, Tom

Dear folks, I'm testing a downsized R build - in features and obviously sizes - for a "modern" flat deployment (eg. like python virtualenv, just to name one). Questions: 1) Is flat style possible? 2) With this setup, R and packages can be installed/updated? 3) The directory can be easy renamed or moved? ----------------...

...ver a samba share and get correct info form the file in windows explorer. * ls -l also returns correct info, *WHILE* stat, mc, and other programs raise up with an error regarding a value too high for defined data type. * If I try to create the file with ntbackup directly over the share, it gets downsized to 0 bytes and grows slowly while ntbackup dies when the file crosses the 4 Gb (exactly) size. *I have compiled myself version 2.2.2 of samba and, surprisingly, the 4Gb "limit" situation described above was taken down to 2 Gb exactly. Any idea on what's happening, please?? Thanks...

...t, size_t) __attribute__((alloc_size(1,2))); void* fn() { return my_calloc(1, 3); } which would get translated to: define i8* @fn() { entry: %call = call i8* @my_calloc(i32 1, i32 3), !alloc_size !0 ret i8* %call } declare i8* @my_calloc(i32, i32) !0 = metadata !{i32 0, i32 1} The downsize is that the metadata is added to all call sites, since it's not possible to attach metadata to function declarations. Any comment, suggestion, etc? Thanks, Nuno

Hello All, I am drawing four contour plots on a 2x2 layout. I need to downsize the contour line labels. cex and labcex do not seem to work. Any suggestions? Thanks, John. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. John Janmaat Department of Economics, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS, B4P 2R6 E-mail: jjanmaat at acadiau.ca W...

Hello, I am fixing up a system for someone and they did not make a separate partition for /tmp...but I want to make it noexec, nosuid. I came across a site that said I could skip all the mount/unmount and new partition stuff (which would probably include downsizing a lvm to make room for it)... by adding this in fstab /tmp /tmp bind nosuid,noexec,bind 0 0 and then reboot... There is

I accidentally discovered 'convert'. It is a command line utility. Changing a file from png to gif works like this convert aaa.png aaa.gif Amazingly simple, powerful and effective. I've since discovered it has an amazing list of options convert --help a manual file:///usr/share/doc/ImageMagick-6.2.8/www/convert.html and a web site http://www.imagemagick.org/ Does anyone

...; > } > > > which would get translated to: > > > define i8* @fn() { > entry: > %call = call i8* @my_calloc(i32 1, i32 3), !alloc_size !0 > ret i8* %call > } > > declare i8* @my_calloc(i32, i32) > > !0 = metadata !{i32 0, i32 1} > > > The downsize is that the metadata is added to all call sites, since > it's not possible to attach metadata to function declarations. > > Any comment, suggestion, etc? > > Thanks, > Nuno > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at c...

...be carefully studied. The advantage of #2 is the low overhead. Adding a bit won't add much if any memory overhead. Packing / unpacking are both very easy. This is especially good for register allocator, which can still model register liveness even when there are intra-bundle dependencies. The downsize of #2 is also obvious. Every pass that operates on MachineInstr will have to be aware of bundles. This is the only real downsize that I can think of, but it's a big one. Evan > > Best regards, > Timo Stripf > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Evan Cheng [mailto:e...

...be carefully studied. The advantage of #2 is the low overhead. Adding a bit won't add much if any memory overhead. Packing / unpacking are both very easy. This is especially good for register allocator, which can still model register liveness even when there are intra-bundle dependencies. The downsize of #2 is also obvious. Every pass that operates on MachineInstr will have to be aware of bundles. This is the only real downsize that I can think of, but it's a big one. Evan > > Best regards, > Timo Stripf > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Evan Cheng [mailto:e...

Niki Kovacs wrote: > Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a ?crit : >> What is NOT obvious: for single device installs, if you omit the size >> in the create mount point dialog, the size of the resulting volume >> will consume all remaining space. But since there's no way to preset >> raid5 at the time a mount point is created (raid5 is set after the >> fact),

Hi! We're cleaning house, trying to downsize so we can move into a retirement community, so we're finding all sorts of stuff to get rid of. One thing I'm reluctant to throw out is my Multitech MT5600BA V90 modem. I used it for dialup for several years before broadband became available and it was great, stable, and fast. (its predece...

From: "Thomas Kirk" <thomas@arkena.com> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 03:41:54PM +0200, Thomas Kirk wrote: > > > I'll update the playlist as i get around to it ;-) > > Ive updated the channel with new albums. So fare it has been rock > stable :) I've had this on in the office, and apart from some initial problems with finding the right input plugin for

I don't know if this is the place I should ask these ?s, but it is a good place to start. I am running Winmx 3.54b4 and WCS on Xubuntu 7.10 with KDE thru Wine[latest version]. So far, mostly works gr8, but I have noticed 2 things I would like tom correct if possible: 1] There is no downsize button on my winmx screen (that would drop app down to panel/taskbar) WCS has one and it works. Any fix for this? 2] I cannot play a song from the transfers window in winmx. I right click on a completed song and click on Play, but nothing happens. What would I need to do to play a song from tran...

Hi all, I'm experiencing a problem when NTBACKING'UP my W2000 Server files against a Linux 2.4.9 + ReiserFS 3.6 file system + Samba share. It works OK for the first 4 Gb's around file size. Then ntbackup stops serving data and the file on the samba side appears to be downsized to 0 and growing ssssslowly. Once you stop ntbackup by killing the process, the file reappears at its real size (more than 4Gbs), but, since ntbackup stopped, it is impossoble to recover. I have also created a local 22Gb. file in the W2000 Server, then moved it to the Linux box via Samba and it...

...ange looking behavior to me. One of my simple test scenario was following: - partition some block device (lets say sda sectors 2-2000 are sda1) - try to create btrfs on top of it (just mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda1) - fill the fs with data - unmount the device - let''s simulate usual mistake here: downsize the partition with btrfs filesystem w/o proper btrfs resize command. In fact I moved the beginning of the sda2 partition into middle of former sda1. so now it looks like: 2-1000 sda1, 1001-2000 sda2. - remount the fs I was surprised both commands btrfsck and mount were successful w/o any error...

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 4:20 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Niki Kovacs wrote: >> Le 18/02/2015 23:12, >> close, but then, for mysterious reasons, Red Hat decided to cripple it >> into oblivion. Go figure. > > One word: desktop. That's what they want to conquer next. OK well there's a really long road to get to that pie in the sky. I don't see it

I am attempting to use rsync to backup a Win98 laptop to a FreeBSD 4.8 backup server. I have experienced the same problem at roughly the same point in the process on two occations. The laptop contains ~2.7Gb of data. On the first attempt we received this error at 2.3Gb and on the second at 2.4Gb. rsync error: partial transfer (code 23) at main.c(575) Would love to have a full backup of the