search for: dovecot_openssl_realloc

...USED) #else static void *dovecot_openssl_malloc(size_t size) @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static void *dovecot_openssl_malloc(size_t size) return mem; } -#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x10100000L +#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x10100000L && !defined(LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER) static void *dovecot_openssl_realloc(void *ptr, size_t size, const char *u0 ATTR_UNUSED, int u1 ATTR_UNUSED) #else static void *dovecot_openssl_realloc(void *ptr, size_t size) @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static void *dovecot_openssl_realloc(void *ptr, size_t return mem; } -#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x10100000L +#if OPENSSL_VERSION...

If the standard way works, I am happy to include the original patch I sent, amended so that it checks for presence of LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER. If they keep this promise, then we should have no worries about things breaking up. Aki On 02.11.2016 14:24, Michael A. Peters wrote: > Indeed, which is why I use it. > > But it also is in the minority which is why I find it acceptable for