Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "dovecot_backend".
2019 Apr 26
2
faI2ban detecting and banning but nothing happens
...n banned, can you look at the iptables rules to see
> what is actually being applied.
Hi Pete,
I did wonder that myself. I have now amended to Dovecot definition in jail.conf to:
[dovecot]
port = pop3,pop3s,imap,imaps,submission,sieve,25,1025,465,587
logpath = %(dovecot_log)s
backend = %(dovecot_backend)s
I then unbanned and banned each IP address manually with
for F in 46.232.112.21 106.226.231.159 [snip] 52.38.234.254 ; do
fail2ban-client set dovecot unbanip $F
fail2ban-client set dovecot banip $F
done
which worked. However, having done this, the connections are still getting through to EXIM...
2019 Apr 26
0
faI2ban detecting and banning but nothing happens
>
> I did wonder that myself. I have now amended to Dovecot definition in jail.conf to:
>
> [dovecot]
>
> port = pop3,pop3s,imap,imaps,submission,sieve,25,1025,465,587
> logpath = %(dovecot_log)s
> backend = %(dovecot_backend)s
>
> I then unbanned and banned each IP address manually with
Did you reload the configuration? ("fail2ban-client reload")
What action are you using - you mention ipset, are you using iptables-
ipset-proto4? I don't know anything about ipset, but can you see what
ports are...
2019 Apr 29
2
faI2ban detecting and banning but nothing happens
On Monday 29 April 2019 02:21:05 Gordon Messmer wrote:
> That's one approach.? I believe that you could modify fewer files by
> setting "port = 0:65535" in your definition in "jail.local" and not
> install firewallcmd-ipset.local.
I have just tried this, and re-started fail2ban. It does not seem to have worked.
I have looked at /var/log/exim/main.log and found
2019 Apr 19
2
faI2ban detecting and banning but nothing happens
On Friday 19 April 2019 15:19:26 Pete Biggs wrote:
> > I've added a fail regex to /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/exim.conf as suggested
> > on another page:
>
> The standard exim.conf already has a 535 filter. Was that not working
> for you?
I was following the instructions as shown on the page. I did find after
sending my post that there was already a regex in the standard