Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "dovecot_antispam".
2015 Jan 26
1
LDA input validation
...s and if i could i would have gone out for beat every responsible admin straight in the face
>
> I may discard emails based on RBLs, but I don't want to discard emails based on statistical fllters, I prefer deliver them in the Junk folder and let the user have a chance to reclassify using dovecot_antispam.
> And yes, bounce spams to (forged or not) sender is useless
you *must not* discard mails - in no context - period
that's why milters exist to tag between let say 5.0 and 8.0 spam points
and REJECT pre-queue based on SpamAssassin and/or ClamAV
maybe dspam can't do that, but it's...
2015 Jan 26
2
LDA input validation
Am 26.01.2015 um 08:52 schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2015, Joseph Tam wrote:
>> St?phane Cottin writes:
>
>>> dspam already send errors to syslog, the point here is to never loose
>>> email contents. This was a wrong design, i'm now use a wrapper instead
>>> ( see my previous post for details ).
>
>> You're stilling going to lose
2015 Jan 26
0
LDA input validation
...ders and if i could i would have gone out for beat every responsible admin straight in the face
>
I may discard emails based on RBLs, but I don't want to discard emails based on statistical fllters, I prefer deliver them in the Junk folder and let the user have a chance to reclassify using dovecot_antispam.
And yes, bounce spams to (forged or not) sender is useless.