Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "dougmiles".
2014 Apr 14
4
[Bug 10552] New: Sender checksum calculation significantly slower with compression enabled
...compression enabled
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: dougmiles at cox.net
QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org
I've noticed that with the -z option enabled, comparing two files that are
identical (or nearly so) but have different modification times takes
significantly longer than without the -z option. It looks like the entire file
is compressed as...
2018 May 30
1
[ovirt-users] Re: Gluster problems, cluster performance issues
Adding Ravi to look into the heal issue.
As for the fsync hang and subsequent IO errors, it seems a lot like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497156 and Paolo Bonzini from
qemu had pointed out that this would be fixed by the following commit:
commit e72c9a2a67a6400c8ef3d01d4c461dbbbfa0e1f0
Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>
Date: Wed Jun 21 16:35:46 2017
2018 May 30
2
[ovirt-users] Re: Gluster problems, cluster performance issues
The profile seems to suggest very high latencies on the brick at
ovirt1.nwfiber.com:/gluster/brick1/engine
ovirt2.* shows decent numbers. Is everything OK with the brick on ovirt1?
Are the bricks of engine volume on both these servers identical in terms of
their config?
-Krutika
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Jim Kusznir <jim at palousetech.com> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Thank you. I
2018 May 30
0
[ovirt-users] Re: Gluster problems, cluster performance issues
Hi all again:
I'm now subscribed to gluster-users as well, so I should get any replies
from that side too.
At this point, I am seeing acceptable (although slower than I expect)
performance much of the time, with periodic massive spikes in latency
(occasionally so bad as to cause ovirt to detect a engine bad health
status). Often, if I check the logs just then, I'll see those call traces
2018 May 30
1
[ovirt-users] Re: Gluster problems, cluster performance issues
I've been back at it, and still am unable to get more than one of my
physical nodes to come online in ovirt, nor am I able to get more than the
two gluster volumes (storage domains) to show online within ovirt.
In Storage -> Volumes, they all show offline (many with one brick down,
which is correct: I have one server off)
However, in Storage -> domains, they all show down (although
2018 Jun 01
0
[ovirt-users] Re: Gluster problems, cluster performance issues
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:16 AM, Jim Kusznir <jim at palousetech.com> wrote:
> I've been back at it, and still am unable to get more than one of my
> physical nodes to come online in ovirt, nor am I able to get more than the
> two gluster volumes (storage domains) to show online within ovirt.
>
> In Storage -> Volumes, they all show offline (many with one brick down,