search for: doughly

Dear Group, I have a data frame like the following: x <- c("Mike","A",0.01) x1 <- c("Carl","A",0.2) x2 <- c("Gene","C",0.3) x3 <- c("James","A",-0.3) x4 <- c("Dough","B",0) xx <- rbind(x,x1,x2,x3,x4) colnames(xx)<-c("Name","Class","NES") xx

..., monitor_fdpass.c, monitor_mml.c, monitor_wrap.c) I first of all don't understand what these modules are doing, and the parts I do understand don't make sense to me. So if anyone out there could be soo kind to help me out with this issue I would be greatly appreciative. Thank you, Joey Doughly _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

Hello everybody, I am working on a project trying to port openSSH and have noticed that some of the components rely on SSL which is a pretty big program as well. Is there any way to just rip out certain modules from SSL to get openSSH to work with out porting all of the SSL components, and if so what are the only SSL modules I need to get SSH to work properly. Any help will be greatly

Dear All, I have several CentOS 7 machines (but not all of them) on which I have noticed that something gets written to /root/.cache/mesa every so often (once every several days). It is my understanding that mesa is related to GUI (X11), but on these machines (on neither of my machines, actually) root never logs in to GUI X11. I may have remote root logins with Xforwarding though. Hence my

I know this is on the wiki, I just want to confirm so I don't blow up my cisco phones. I've got several cisco 7940's all running using cisco power cubes. However, my boss wants me to switch just a few over to poe, but doesn't want to fork out the dough for a nice cisco poe switch, or anybody else's poe switch for that matter. So my question is, what is the '99.999%

Thanks Vardan, I will like to know if this scenario can work when peer is not having fixed ip and we use host = nasir.server.com ? also I have set insecure=invite,port what if i use insecure=no thanks again. Message: 24 Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 10:52:14 +0500 From: Vardan <hvardan71 at gmail.com> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Dialing a SIP Peer without using register strin To:

This is the rsync version I am using. rsync version 2.5.5 protocol version 26 Copyright (C) 1996-2002 by Andrew Tridgell and others <http://rsync.samba.org/> Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks, batchfiles, IPv6, 64-bit system inums, 64-bit internal inums I have a file with a looooong name which I rsync from PC1 to PC2. (redhat-9) I am getting the

Ok I've fed this problem with about five hours of my time to post to a list about it. nmbd does not appear to be doing what it should. Why I'm not certain. The unix host (running samba) is not appearing in on the windows browse list (i.e. it's not showing up in the network neighbourhood). when I run nmbd with -d2 I get the following: Netbios nameserver version 2.2.8 started.

At 11:08 AM -0500 7/12/04, Steven Critchfield wrote: >[snip] > >Would it be something people would like to be able to add filters to a >line? Consider normalization as a filter. Monitor could then be moved to >a filter as well. Echo cancel could be a filter. Set it up so multiple >filters could be added and chained together. This could help those with >echo chain a couple of

id like to access libvirt kvm consoles from my macbook. i tried realvnc, which just crashes immediately, and the built in "screen sharing" client, which insists on a password, which i havent set. does anyone here do this? which vnc client do you use?

Hi Vardan I did same as you told and deleted the SIP information in Astdb and restarted asterisk. but the result was same. as you said there might be mistake in sip.conf so i am pasting both servers configuration here.. 1- nasir.server.com [abc] username=abc type=friend secret=mysecret nat=yes mailbox=12234568 incominglimit=2 outgoinglimit=2 host=dynamic dtmfmode=rfc2833 context=payasyougo

Yes this scenario works on my 2 systems which are at LAN. I made one system as server (192.168.0.20) and registered from other system... it is fine but now there is a different scene. actually there is a registered user named abc at system1 (192.168.0.20) having context [payasyougo] which is used to do outbound calls. we want to use this user's context and account so that when we register

os x comes with openssh, and some other nixy goodness. the rest you can get at brew.sh. when i ssh -Y into the host, ill just virt-manager or virt-viewer, but the x server on os x comes with some baggage and silly annoyances like "helpfully" trapping the mouse with a release combo thats hard to deal with from os x. running a vnc client over os x would still come with baggage and

We are *days* away from the official 0.3.13 release, which will be followed quickly by 0.4 code named Enterprisey Edition 1.2. This latest pre-release update closes off the last of the annoying bugs, and adds one very nasty feature people should check out before we release. Read about Katanas below. ** This release doesn''t have win32 yet. That''ll be uploaded Monday. ** WHAT

I seem to be running into a problem where I am trying to rsync from a source directory that lacks write permissions (i.e. r-xr-xr-x). Presumably this is because rsync creates the directory on the destination, then sets the permissions to match the source and then tries to sync the contents of the directory, which it cannot of course lacking write permission in the directory. Is there a way to

Received this email this morning. But I seem to be the last poster on that list and search says the topic doesn't exists. Is there a next page problem on the forum, or is it just spam? Hello, You are receiving this email because you are watching the topic, "The perils of GMAX" at WineHQ Forums. This topic has received a reply since your last visit. You can use the following link

Hi, Thanks Zed - this is very interesting. One item in particular caught my eye: Does anyone on this list have any comments or validation that Rails 1.2.1 is 2-4 times as slow as Rails 1.1.6? Topfunky provided a link that purports what looks like really horrible performance and memory characteristics for Rails 1.2.1, even v. 1.1.6:

Recent SUP. Installed on Dell PowerEdge 4600. Getting tons of: Sep 30 12:23:16 zige /kernel: bge0: gigabit link up Sep 30 12:23:46 zige last message repeated 98 times Also getting some TCP retransmits. This causes noticable delays in pretty much everything I do now. Not a problem prior to the SUP. I was on 4.8-STABLE before. When pulling/replacing cables, it went into a mode where it would

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 08:22:39AM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > PS This gives me dejavu. A while ago when people started demanding to have > google chrome browser installed on their workstations I had hard time to get > rid of google's cron jobs that were writing where only root should - without > explicit permission to do so. Dough. Somebody's software thinks it is >