Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "doublign".
Did you mean:
doubleg
2004 Aug 06
4
Optimizing speex for 44.1kHz
> The cost of down-sampling, if done efficiently, is probably less then
> the cost difference between 32 kHz and 44.1 kHz so it's probably worth
> it. If you don't care about standard sampling rate, you could even to a
> 2/3 conversion which would get you 29.4 kHz...
I'm curious why not just sample at a lower rate if it's just VoIP
anyway? My opinion is that 44kHz