search for: doubli

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 252 matches for "doubli".

Did you mean: double
2006 Mar 02
1
Doubly Non-Central F-Distribution
Dear Professor I have read your questions in the website on Doubly non-central F-distribution. I am looking for source code for evaluating this function now. I have matlab code but it's only accurate up to the 4th decimal point. Dataplot is more accurate, but it is not user friendly as you only can evaluate one function at a time. So I would like to know do you have found any R code for
2005 Nov 01
1
Doubly Non-Central F-Distribution
Hello All, Has anyone written a function for the distribution function of a *doubly* non-central F-distribution? I looked through the archives, but didn't find anything. Thanks! Wolfgang
2004 Jul 04
2
doubly multivariate analysis in R
20 subjects were measured in 5 conditions (thus repeated measures) and for each subject in each condition there are 4 response measures (thus multivariate as it is a combined score that needs to be compared across the conditions). So, using a multivariate approach to repeated measures this is a doubly multivariate analysis. I would appreciate any suggestions as to the best way to do such a
2001 Jun 01
1
Export knfsd/ext3 on doubly patched kernel(knfsd/reiserfs) OK?
Hi - if I have a doubly patched kernel (2.4.5) (1) Apply gkernel/CVS ext3 patches (2) Apply Neil Brown/Reiserfs team knfsd and reiserfs patches Will ext3 be exportable by knfsd (i.e. inherit automagically the nfsd_operations thingies from ext2) or does it need further patching? -- Chan Shih-Ping (Richard) <cshihpin@dso.org.sg> DSO National Laboratories 20 Science Park Drive
2003 Oct 02
0
Doubly Multivariate LME
Dear R: I am trying to fit a doubly multivariate LME (DM) where I have two response variables measured on two occasions per person. Specifically, reading and math scores measured at the beginning and ending of a school year. The response variables have a correlation of r = .85. The response variables in the data matrix are stacked in a vector with a dummy code flagging each outcome and with
2008 Dec 18
0
oplock behavior of samba 3.2.6 causes corruption of netscape mailbox files, mails seem to be received doubly or triply
Hi guys, we're running a samba server on a sles 9 with sp2. The server hosts the netscape mailbox files for our users in our terminal server environment. There were never problems with these files. After upgrading from samba 3.0.21 to 3.2.6 (sernet-built) the mailbox files of nearly all users got corrupt while working with netscape. We got the following symptoms. The users seem to receive
2014 Mar 21
3
[LLVMdev] LLD: Layout-after and layout-before
+llvmdev On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to debug an issue that LLD sometimes get into an infinite loop > in setChainRoot() in LayoutPass.cpp. It looks like the cause is either > buildPrecededByTable() handles layoutBefore edges in a wrong way or we > construct a contradictory layout-before/layout-after
2014 Mar 21
2
[LLVMdev] LLD: Layout-after and layout-before
Thank you for quick responses! As to dead stripping, if dead stripping is the only pass we need bi-directional edges, we might want the dead stripping pass to construct internal data structure by reversing the graph to construct layout-before edges from layout-after edges. This should be less error prone than maintaining two reverse-directional edges throughout all passes. Of course it will make
2011 Aug 10
4
Clustering Large Applications..sort of
Hello all, I am using the clustering functions in R in order to work with large masses of binary time series data, however the clustering functions do not seem able to fit this size of practical problem. Library 'hclust' is good (though it may be sub par for this size of problem, thus doubly poor for this application) in that I do not want to make assumptions about the number of
2011 Mar 23
5
[LLVMdev] RFC: GSoC Project
Hi All! I will be applying to the LLVM project for this GSoC, and I wanted some preliminary sanity check on my project idea. I intend to implement split (segmented) stacks for LLVM (like we have in Go, and as being implemented for GCC [1]). A lot of what follows is lifted from [1]; I will progressively add more details as I get more familiar with the LLVM codebase. I intend to start with
2002 Mar 21
2
bug in ssh-keyscan.c --
===== Ladies/Gents, "ssh-keyscan.c" can't be linked statically against "libssh.a". You end up with `fatal()' being doubly defined. The patch below deletes the new "ssh-keyscan.c:fatal()" function and and restores the "ssh-keyscan.c:fatal_callback()" function with modifi- cations. The problem that both attempt to alleviate is the setting of the
2005 Sep 09
7
[PATCH 0/6] jbd cleanup
The following 6 patches cleanup the jbd code and kill about 200 lines. First of 4 patches can apply to 2.6.13-git8 and 2.6.13-mm2. The rest of them can apply to 2.6.13-mm2. fs/jbd/checkpoint.c | 179 +++++++++++-------------------------------- fs/jbd/commit.c | 101 ++++++++++-------------- fs/jbd/journal.c | 11 +- fs/jbd/revoke.c | 158
2020 Jan 16
2
[llvm-exegesis]?==?utf-8?q? [RFC] Renaming Uops- classes
Since the option of running -mode=inverse_throughput was added to llvm-exegesis the names of classes like UopsSnippetGenerator and UopsBenchmarkRunner, that this mode shares with uops, started to be less descriptive. Inverse_throughput doesn't use the uops counters, so for example, the instruction layout shared between these two modes is really connected to parallelism, not uops. It's
2010 Aug 05
3
Odd question: memdisk emulate multiple drives?
Is it possible to have memdisk emulate multiple drives? Here's why I'm asking: I have a Dell server that I replaced the motherboard. I want to reset the service tag to the correct tag for the system, and the only way to do that is to run a Dell tool under DOS. I have downloaded the tool, but it is doubly-wrapped: a self-extracting ZIP file (which I unzipped under Linux) which contains a
2005 Dec 02
3
plot and factors
Read R-helpers, I'm relatively new to R and trying to jump in feet first. I've been able to learn a lot from on-line and printed documentation, but here's one question to which I can't find an answer. Well, it's a question with a couple parts. Thanks in advance for any direction (partial or complete) that anyone can provide. I have a data frame with three columns:
2006 Oct 16
2
Re : Re : Generate a random bistochastic matrix
Yes, you're right. In fact, it's just an adaptation of a matlab command and the author advises using N^4 replications that's why it's the default in the function. The bistochastic matrix is not my subject of interest, but I need it to perform some random tranformation of a vector of incomes. Florent Bresson ----- Message d'origine ---- De : Richard M. Heiberger <rmh at
2013 Dec 18
2
[LLVMdev] CMake changes
On Dec 17, 2013, at 9:32 , Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2013, at 9:24 , Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com> wrote: > >> Hi, Takumi. Your CMake changes seem to be working just fine with the standalone Xcode build. However, the build products are still being put in bin/Debug instead of Debug/bin. Was that supposed to change yet? Maybe
2008 Aug 14
2
Department of Redundancy Department.
I just noticed a certain ``usage'' in a recent posting, and couldn't restrain my self from commenting. The usage was of the form ``if(X==TRUE)'' where X was a logical variable. This sort of thing is brought to you by your Department of Redundancy Department. The ``==TRUE'' bit is irrelevant, incompetent, and immaterial, as Perry Mason used to say. The value of
2011 Apr 10
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: GSoC Project
I wonder - would something like this allow for multiple stacks for a single thread? I'm thinking of something like continuations / fibers / green threads, which would be very handy. On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>wrote: > Hi All! > > I will be applying to the LLVM project for this GSoC, and I wanted some > preliminary sanity
2014 Mar 06
2
A question about multiple(?) out of order ReleaseObject
Hello, This is a question that probably reveals my lack of understanding. In a C function (call it cfunc), i created a SEXP, called S, and then called R_PreserveObject on S. I returned the SEXP to the calling R function (call it rfunc). Note, I didn't call R_ReleaseObject on S. v <- .Call("cfunc") So, are the following statements correct 1. S is 'doubly' protected