search for: dotnewtyp

...> ADDfalse_new (predicate new form of false) // Define Predicate New relation def getPredNewOpcode : InstrMapping { let FilterClass = "PredNewRel"; let RowFields = ["BaseOpcode"]; // ColFields is a list of flags/attributes of the instructions. let ColFields = ["DotNewType", "PredSense"]; // Here 'DotNewType' of the KeyCol is "" and Predsense can be either 'true' or 'false' let KeyCol = ["", "-"]; // Value Column has DotNewType= "new" and predsense same as KeyCol. // '-' is u...

...false) > > // Define Predicate New relation > def getPredNewOpcode : InstrMapping { > let FilterClass = "PredNewRel"; > > let RowFields = ["BaseOpcode"]; > > // ColFields is a list of flags/attributes of the instructions. > let ColFields = ["DotNewType", "PredSense"]; > > // Here 'DotNewType' of the KeyCol is "" and Predsense can be either 'true' > or 'false' > let KeyCol = ["", "-"]; > > // Value Column has DotNewType= "new" and predsense same as...

...false) > > // Define Predicate New relation > def getPredNewOpcode : InstrMapping { > let FilterClass = "PredNewRel"; > > let RowFields = ["BaseOpcode"]; > > // ColFields is a list of flags/attributes of the instructions. > let ColFields = ["DotNewType", "PredSense"]; > > // Here 'DotNewType' of the KeyCol is "" and Predsense can be either 'true' > or 'false' > let KeyCol = ["", "-"]; > > // Value Column has DotNewType= "new" and predsense same as...

...false) > > // Define Predicate New relation > def getPredNewOpcode : InstrMapping { > let FilterClass = "PredNewRel"; > > let RowFields = ["BaseOpcode"]; > > // ColFields is a list of flags/attributes of the instructions. > let ColFields = ["DotNewType", "PredSense"]; > > // Here 'DotNewType' of the KeyCol is "" and Predsense can be either 'true' > or 'false' > let KeyCol = ["", "-"]; > > // Value Column has DotNewType= "new" and predsense same as...

On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:02 AM, "Jyotsna Verma" <jverma at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > Hi Jacob, > > Thanks for the suggestions. I have a few questions here. > >> You are on to something here, but you don't need to define a 'Relations' > class >> on top of the tablegen records. They are already relations, you just need > the >>

Hi Jacob, Thanks for the suggestions. I have a few questions here. > You are on to something here, but you don't need to define a 'Relations' class > on top of the tablegen records. They are already relations, you just need the > proper query language to match the instructions you want. Are you saying that the mechanism is already present which allows us to relate