Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "dotheth".
Did you mean:
dothat
2006 Jan 25
8
RE: Make all LI items draggable
If you want the whole list draggable as one entity, you make one
draggable. If you want each item draggable on their own, you need to
make each one a new draggable.
-----Original Message-----
From: rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org
[mailto:rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of
2010 Feb 01
2
[LLVMdev] llvm interpreter cannot execute llvm-gcc generated bitcode
Hello again!
We have fetched the latest llvm sources from repository and the
original problem has went away. Though now we are facing a new problem
with interpreter on the following c code:
--------------
#include <stdarg.h>
#include <stdio.h>
void doTheThing(int dummy, ...)
{
va_list ap;
int z;
va_start(ap, dummy);
while( (z = va_arg(ap, int))!=0)
{
printf("== %i ==\n", z);
}
va_end(ap);
}
int main()
{
doTheThing(-1, 1, 2, 3, 0);
}
--------------
Running the bitcode of this example through interpreter yields
abnormal...
2010 Feb 01
0
[LLVMdev] llvm interpreter cannot execute llvm-gcc generated bitcode
...!
>
> We have fetched the latest llvm sources from repository and the
> original problem has went away. Though now we are facing a new problem
> with interpreter on the following c code:
>
> --------------
> #include <stdarg.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> void doTheThing(int dummy, ...)
> {
> va_list ap;
> int z;
>
> va_start(ap, dummy);
> while( (z = va_arg(ap, int))!=0)
> {
> printf("== %i ==\n", z);
> }
> va_end(ap);
> }
>
> int main()
> {
> doTheThing(-1, 1, 2, 3, 0);
> }
>...
2010 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] llvm interpreter cannot execute llvm-gcc generated bitcode
Kristaps Straupe wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We are compiling a very large C project in llvm and trying to execute
> it in interpreter. There is a problem with executing the generated
> bitcode.
The interpreter is under-maintained in general, but this bug in
particular is fixed SVN as-of r86428. Are you on a platform that isn't
supported by llvm's jit?
Nick
> We are using
2010 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] llvm interpreter cannot execute llvm-gcc generated bitcode
Hi!
We are compiling a very large C project in llvm and trying to execute
it in interpreter. There is a problem with executing the generated
bitcode.
We are using lli.exe and llvm-gcc.exe from official 2.6 LLVM release.
We have localized the problem to following c code:
--------------------
int f(unsigned char x) __attribute__((noinline));
int f(unsigned char x)
{
return x - 1;
}
int main()
2020 Jun 16
3
Codifying our Brace rules-
I'm with Matt on this one. I much prefer the approach of ALWAYS use braces
for ifs and for loops, even if they're not needed, for basically the same
reasons as he put. The number of times I've added a statement inside an if
without braces and forget to add them is annoyingly high, especially as
it's not always an obvious error upfront. Similarly, being involved in a
downstream