Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "dotests".
Did you mean:
detests
2013 Nov 18
5
How to keep samba4 dc work fine when windows dc offline?
I'm testing a samba4 server join AD (had 1 win2003 dc) as dc. Version:
Samba4 DC: samba 4.1.1 with ubuntu (172.16.3.8)
Win2003 DC: Win2003 SP2 (172.16.3.3)
AD domain name: dotest.com
The samba server had joined to AD as DC. When win2003 dc online, it seems
works fine.
When I test win2003 dc online, simulate the win2003 DC was failue, found
the samba4 DC can't work fine along. The AD
2008 Jul 08
0
How put a link for a attachament in Wine's Wiki
Hi, I am translating some parts of Wine's wiki to Spanish.
In page http://wiki.winehq.org/MakeTestFailures says:
--snip--
Download the dotests script and place it in the programs/winetest directory
--/snip--
dotest is a link to attachament, then in the same page (translated to Spanish) i need put these attachament linked.
I have put this code for these part:
English page (http://wiki.winehq.org/MakeTestFailures):
Download the attachme...
2006 May 09
1
name_url in tests
Hi there,
I posted earlier asking about testing named routes in functional tests, but got no response, so I''m making my question less specific.
It seems from the docs that it''s possible to to test named routes in cases such as:
asserts_redirect_to name_url(:param => "whatever")
but I haven''t seen any mention of it being used with any other tests and I keep
2008 May 30
3
MakeTestFailures
http://wiki.winehq.org/MakeTestFailures
I downloaded and compiled from bleding-edge git and ran these last
night. I boggled slightly when the unit testing actually crashed X
(Kubuntu Hardy, kwin) - is anyone else getting this? I ran the tests
again in failsafe (just a naked xterm - or, rather, konsole - and no
window manager) and they finished and submitted OK.
(Are others running these? By the
2018 Jun 14
3
[lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm
> On Jun 14, 2018, at 7:01 AM, Pavel Labath via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Thank you all. I am going to try to reply to all comments in a single email.
>
> Regarding the .apple_objc idea, I am afraid the situation is not as
> simple as just flipping a switch.
Jonas is currently working on adding the support for DWARF5-style Objective-C accelerator
2019 Jan 02
4
[lit] check-all hanging
Hi David, Chandler,
I see lldb tests hang often, and then I kill the dotest process.
I'd like to stop running check-all too, but I feel it's important when I
modify FileCheck. The flakiness that Chandler mentioned makes it
time-consuming to verify test results.
Joel
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 4:41 PM Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> What
2012 Oct 10
7
multiple t-tests across similar variable names
Hi everyone-
I have a dataset with multiple "pre" and "post" variables I want to compare. The variables are named "apple_pre" or "pre_banana" with the corresponding post variables named "apple_post" or "post_banana". The variables are in no particular order.
apple_pre orange_pre orange_post pre_banana apple_post post_banana
person_1
2018 Jun 13
2
[lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm
> On Jun 13, 2018, at 11:18 AM, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Pavel,
>
>> On Jun 13, 2018, at 6:56 AM, Pavel Labath <labath at google.com <mailto:labath at google.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello again,
>>
>> It's been nearly six months since my first email, so it's a good time
>> to
2007 Apr 03
3
More weirdness with PHP bindings
Hi all,
There's been a odd bug reported to us by Daniel Menard while working on
the PHP bindings:
"I then tried to run the dotest target...All tests passed, except the
one about get_matching_terms (smoketest.php line 94).
I added this line before the exit:
for ($i=0; $i<strlen($terms); $i++) echo $c=ord($terms[$i]), ' ',
($c>31?$terms[$i]:''), "\n";
2019 Jan 02
3
[lit] check-all hanging
Hi,
>From time to time, I see check-all hang during running of lit tests.
The hang always happens at the > 90% completion stage and I'm pretty
sure all tests have been run and check-all is just waiting for
lit/python to exit. I see a single python processing running, taking
very little CPU time. An strace of that process shows this:
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 50000}) = 0
2007 Apr 18
5
[patch 0/4] Revised softlockup watchdog improvement patches
Hi Ingo,
This series of patches implements a number of improvements to the
softlockup watchdog and its users.
They are:
1. Make the watchdog ignore stolen time
When running under a hypervisor, the kernel may lose an arbitrary amount
of time as "stolen time". This may cause the softlockup watchdog to
trigger spruiously. Xen and VMI implement sched_clock() as measuring
unstolen time,
2007 Apr 18
5
[patch 0/4] Revised softlockup watchdog improvement patches
Hi Ingo,
This series of patches implements a number of improvements to the
softlockup watchdog and its users.
They are:
1. Make the watchdog ignore stolen time
When running under a hypervisor, the kernel may lose an arbitrary amount
of time as "stolen time". This may cause the softlockup watchdog to
trigger spruiously. Xen and VMI implement sched_clock() as measuring
unstolen time,