search for: dotest

I'm testing a samba4 server join AD (had 1 win2003 dc) as dc. Version: Samba4 DC: samba 4.1.1 with ubuntu (172.16.3.8) Win2003 DC: Win2003 SP2 (172.16.3.3) AD domain name: dotest.com The samba server had joined to AD as DC. When win2003 dc online, it seems works fine. When I test win2003 dc online, simulate the win2003 DC was failue, found the samba4 DC can't work fine along. The AD client logon has been very slow. And there are error log in the samba4 dc log file /usr...

Hi, I am translating some parts of Wine's wiki to Spanish. In page http://wiki.winehq.org/MakeTestFailures says: --snip-- Download the dotests script and place it in the programs/winetest directory --/snip-- dotest is a link to attachament, then in the same page (translated to Spanish) i need put these attachament linked. I have put this code for these part: English page (http://wiki.winehq.org/MakeTestFailures): Download the attachm...

...in assert_recognizes (see below). Is there anything in particular I have to do to get the _url functionality imported into my tests? I''m using rails 1.1.2 thanks for any pointers in the dark-arts of URL rewriting tests. dorian Test: # named routes opts = { :action => "dotest", :test => "test1" } assert_recognizes opts, taste_url(:action => "dotest", :test => "test1") Error ( I have a route named ''taste''): test_routes(FilmsControllerTest): NoMethodError: You have a nil object when you didn''t e...

http://wiki.winehq.org/MakeTestFailures I downloaded and compiled from bleding-edge git and ran these last night. I boggled slightly when the unit testing actually crashed X (Kubuntu Hardy, kwin) - is anyone else getting this? I ran the tests again in failsafe (just a naked xterm - or, rather, konsole - and no window manager) and they finished and submitted OK. (Are others running these? By the

...compassed in a single .cpp file which is about 250 > LOC. The class has about a dozen entry points and most of them are > accessible through the lldb-test tool, which I've used to write > targeted regression tests for this (it could probably use more of > those). I did use the "dotest" suite as an integration test suite, but > I did that by simply passing --env CFLAGS_EXTRAS="-mllvm > -accel-tables=Dwarf" to dotest (I also tried hacking clang to always > emit the new tables to make sure I'm not missing anything). > Ironically, if you try that now,...

Hi David, Chandler, I see lldb tests hang often, and then I kill the dotest process. I'd like to stop running check-all too, but I feel it's important when I modify FileCheck. The flakiness that Chandler mentioned makes it time-consuming to verify test results. Joel On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 4:41 PM Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>...

Hi everyone- I have a dataset with multiple "pre" and "post" variables I want to compare. The variables are named "apple_pre" or "pre_banana" with the corresponding post variables named "apple_post" or "post_banana". The variables are in no particular order. apple_pre orange_pre orange_post pre_banana apple_post post_banana person_1

> On Jun 13, 2018, at 11:18 AM, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Pavel, > >> On Jun 13, 2018, at 6:56 AM, Pavel Labath <labath at google.com <mailto:labath at google.com>> wrote: >> >> Hello again, >> >> It's been nearly six months since my first email, so it's a good time >> to

Hi all, There's been a odd bug reported to us by Daniel Menard while working on the PHP bindings: "I then tried to run the dotest target...All tests passed, except the one about get_matching_terms (smoketest.php line 94). I added this line before the exit: for ($i=0; $i<strlen($terms); $i++) echo $c=ord($terms[$i]), ' ', ($c>31?$terms[$i]:''), "\n"; and it appears that the first letter of eac...

Hi, >From time to time, I see check-all hang during running of lit tests. The hang always happens at the > 90% completion stage and I'm pretty sure all tests have been run and check-all is just waiting for lit/python to exit. I see a single python processing running, taking very little CPU time. An strace of that process shows this: select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 50000}) = 0

Hi Ingo, This series of patches implements a number of improvements to the softlockup watchdog and its users. They are: 1. Make the watchdog ignore stolen time When running under a hypervisor, the kernel may lose an arbitrary amount of time as "stolen time". This may cause the softlockup watchdog to trigger spruiously. Xen and VMI implement sched_clock() as measuring unstolen time,

Hi Ingo, This series of patches implements a number of improvements to the softlockup watchdog and its users. They are: 1. Make the watchdog ignore stolen time When running under a hypervisor, the kernel may lose an arbitrary amount of time as "stolen time". This may cause the softlockup watchdog to trigger spruiously. Xen and VMI implement sched_clock() as measuring unstolen time,