search for: dotcall64

...example the parallel package. I was wondering if there is a process to decide whether or not to include a package in the core implementation of R? For example, why not include the Rcpp package, which became for a lot of user the main tool to extend R? What is our view on the (not so well known) dotCall64 package which is an interesting alternative for extending R? Thank you Best regards, Morgan [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...quot;real" CRAN package with just one dependency: ??? > dir.create("~/lib") ??? > list.files("~/lib") ??? character(0) ??? > install.packages("spam", lib = "~/lib", dependencies = TRUE) ??? > list.files("~/lib") ??? [1] "dotCall64" "spam" ??? > library(spam, lib.loc = "~/lib") ??? Error: package ?dotCall64? required by ?spam? could not be found > > Martin > > > On 07/21/2018 12:34 PM, Martin Maechler wrote: > >>>>>>> Benjamin Tyner > >...

>>>>> Benjamin Tyner >>>>> on Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:42:43 -0400 writes: > Not sure whether it is the same issue as was raised here: > https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-October/058729.html > but in any case perhaps the problem could partially be remedied on line > 245 of src/library/base/R/library.R by passing the lib.loc to

...here is a process to decide whether or not to include a >> package in the core implementation of R? >> >> For example, why not include the Rcpp package, which became for a lot of >> user the main tool to extend R? >> >> What is our view on the (not so well known) dotCall64 package which is an >> interesting alternative for extending R? >> >> Thank you >> Best regards, >> Morgan >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-devel at r-project.org...

...e > dependency: > > ??? > dir.create("~/lib") > ??? > list.files("~/lib") > ??? character(0) > ??? > install.packages("spam", lib = "~/lib", dependencies = TRUE) > ??? > list.files("~/lib") > ??? [1] "dotCall64" "spam" > ??? > library(spam, lib.loc = "~/lib") > ??? Error: package ?dotCall64? required by ?spam? could not be found Not sure if this is a bug: where is it documented that this works not as above (which is what I would expect)? For development puposes, you...

...gt; I was wondering if there is a process to decide whether or not to include a > package in the core implementation of R? > > For example, why not include the Rcpp package, which became for a lot of > user the main tool to extend R? > > What is our view on the (not so well known) dotCall64 package which is an > interesting alternative for extending R? > > Thank you > Best regards, > Morgan > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/m...

...or not to > include a > >> package in the core implementation of R? > >> > >> For example, why not include the Rcpp package, which became for a lot of > >> user the main tool to extend R? > >> > >> What is our view on the (not so well known) dotCall64 package which is > an > >> interesting alternative for extending R? > >> > >> Thank you > >> Best regards, > >> Morgan > >> > I have No arguments with updating code to more correct or modern versions, but I think that as a design decision...

...a > >> package in the core implementation of R? > >> > >> For example, why not include the Rcpp package, which became for a lot of > >> user the main tool to extend R? > >> > >> What is our view on the (not so well known) dotCall64 package which is an > >> interesting alternative for extending R? > >> > >> Thank you > >> Best regards, > >> Morgan > >> > > > I have No arguments with updating code to more correct or modern versions, but I t...