search for: doohicky

Hi all, I am seeing on my logs this message: Jun 13 09:14:51 DEBUG[4944] chan_zap.c: Monitor doohicky got event Event 160 on channel 3 Jun 13 09:14:51 DEBUG[4944] chan_zap.c: Monitor doohicky got event Event 160 on channel 3 (repeated much more then what I will show here). I see that it comes from static void* do_monitor(void *data) in chan_zap.c, but I do not understand what does it mean,...

...vent Alarm(4) on channel 44 (index 0) Feb 21 09:40:34 DEBUG[18063]: Exception on 57, channel 46 Feb 21 09:40:34 DEBUG[18063]: Got event Alarm(4) on channel 46 (index 0) ...etc... It complains about a bunch (though not all) channels. Then, shortly afterwards: Feb 21 09:40:34 DEBUG[22364]: Monitor doohicky got event Alarm on channel 34 Feb 21 09:40:34 WARNING[22364]: Detected alarm on channel 34: Red Alarm Feb 21 09:40:34 WARNING[22364]: Unable to disable echo cancellation on channel 34 Feb 21 09:40:34 DEBUG[22364]: Monitor doohicky got event Alarm on channel 35 Feb 21 09:40:34 WARNING[22364]: Detect...

...channel.c try to call ast_read(), read some bytes from the channel but there is nothing ... whether it's a loop to check data on the channel ? and many times when reciving tax , the E1 card will down , all the channel get red alarm... [Mar 16 09:49:19] DEBUG[20928] chan_dahdi.c: Monitor doohicky got event Alarm on channel 2 [Mar 16 09:49:19] WARNING[20928] chan_dahdi.c: Detected alarm on channel 2: Recovering i then try asterisk 1.4.23.2 and agx-ast-addon , when using spandsp 0.0.5 and spandsp 0.0.6, like above , sometimes all E1 channel get red alarm when reciving fax.... but use spa...

...replaced yet.) I connected that extension to an FXO port on a Digium AEX410 card, and set that channel to have the context "doorphone". The problem is that the extension is never executed. With debugging on, I see: Nov 23 16:37:23] DEBUG[20077]: chan_dahdi.c:11896 do_monitor: Monitor doohicky got event Ring Begin on channel 12 [Nov 23 16:37:23] DEBUG[20077]: sig_analog.c:3621 analog_handle_init_event: channel (12) - signaling (5) - event (ANALOG_EVENT_RINGBEGIN) [Nov 23 16:37:24] DEBUG[20077]: chan_dahdi.c:11896 do_monitor: Monitor doohicky got event Ring/Answered on channel 12 [Nov 23...

...lliseconds (or about 3 or 4 rings on an ear piece). below is some of the log -- note 2 seconds to get from Ring Begin to In Use and a total of 7 seconds before the sip phone rings. anyway to speed this process up? cheers charles Apr 5 16:15:00 DEBUG[7010]: chan_zap.c:6639 do_monitor: Monitor doohicky got event Ring Begin on channel 1 Apr 5 16:15:02 DEBUG[7010]: chan_zap.c:6639 do_monitor: Monitor doohicky got event Ring/Answered on channel 1 Apr 5 16:15:02 DEBUG[6986]: devicestate.c:187 do_state_change: Changing state for Zap/1 - state 2 (In use) Apr 5 16:15:02 DEBUG[7549]: app_queue.c:471 c...

...no Dialing/CallwaitCAS: 0/0 Default law: ulaw Fax Handled: no Pulse phone: no Echo Cancellation: 128 taps unless TDM bridged, currently OFF Actual Confinfo: Num/0, Mode/0x0000 Actual Confmute: No Hookstate (FXS only): Offhook When cable plugged in: [Oct 20 09:02:56] DEBUG[2359] chan_zap.c: Monitor doohicky got event No more alarm on channel 4 [Oct 20 09:02:56] NOTICE[2359] chan_zap.c: Alarm cleared on channel 4 When cable unplugged: [Oct 20 09:04:55] DEBUG[2359] chan_zap.c: Monitor doohicky got event Alarm on channel 4 [Oct 20 09:04:55] WARNING[2359] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 4: No Alarm...

Hey, all. I'm seriously thinking about doing the VoIP thing at home. The perfect platform seemed to be the Sheeva "wall wart" (http://www.marvell.com/products/embedded_processors/developer/kirkwood/sheevaplug.jsp). It's a cute little doohicky with USB, SD-card, Ethernet, and runs on an ARM CPU. I'd like to avoid SIP to my provider, just 'cause it's always such a drag going through NAT and so forth. So I'd like to do IAX -- presumably a trunk (no?). Unfortunately, the Asterisk install in the Sheeva's Ubuntu distro...

...RBS T1 with AMI/D4 framing and E&M Wink. Using a Sangoma A102d and asterisk 1.4.22-2 on Centos5 (Trixbox 2.6.2.1). Outbound calls work fine, but inbound calls fail to read the DID information, and with debug set to 10 I get the following: [Feb 2 19:40:23] DEBUG[25184] chan_zap.c: Monitor doohicky got event Wink/Flash on channel 3 [Feb 2 19:40:23] VERBOSE[25273] logger.c: -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/3-1' [Feb 2 19:40:24] DEBUG[25273] chan_zap.c: Exception on 14, channel 3 [Feb 2 19:40:24] DEBUG[25273] chan_zap.c: Got event Wink/Flash(3) on channel 3 (index 0) [Feb 2...

...(Wheezy), MTNL Mumbai. Digium, Inc. Wildcard AEX410 4-port analog card (PCI-Express) chan_dahdi.conf contains: usecallerid = yes cidsignalling=dtmf cidstart=polarity_in Signalling is fxsks. Log (calling number is 9811066XXX): [Sep 14 08:21:11] DEBUG[9337]: chan_dahdi.c:11895 do_monitor: Monitor doohicky got event Ring Begin on channel 1 [Sep 14 08:21:11] DEBUG[9337]: sig_analog.c:3621 analog_handle_init_event: channel (1) - signaling (5) - event (ANALOG_EVENT_RINGBEGIN) [Sep 14 08:21:11] DEBUG[9337]: chan_dahdi.c:11895 do_monitor: Monitor doohicky got event Ring/Answered on channel 1 [Sep 14 08...

...ers Oct 25 10:27:13 VERBOSE[28965] logger.c: -- Hungup 'Zap/97-1' Oct 25 10:27:13 DEBUG[28976] app_queue.c: Device 'Zap/97' changed to state '0' (Unknown) but we don't care because they're not a member of any queue. Oct 25 10:27:14 DEBUG[3779] chan_zap.c: Monitor doohicky got event Hook Transition Complete on channel 97 Oct 25 10:27:14 DEBUG[3779] chan_zap.c: Monitor doohicky got event Ring/Answered on channel 97 Oct 25 10:27:14 WARNING[3779] chan_zap.c: zt hook failed: Device or resource busy Oct 25 10:27:14 VERBOSE[28977] logger.c: -- Starting simple switch on...

....tif) exten => 300,n,rxfax(${FAXFILE}||debug) I then dialed 300 on my fax machine, and expected to be lucky and to obtain a /tmp/test.tif file after faxing completion. But instead, I always got such error in the /var/log/asterisk/full log file: [Sep 5 13:42:21] DEBUG[1272] chan_zap.c: Monitor doohicky got event Ring/Answered on channel 1 [Sep 5 13:42:21] VERBOSE[1298] logger.c: -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/1-1' [Sep 5 13:42:22] DEBUG[1298] chan_zap.c: DTMF digit: 3 on Zap/1-1 [Sep 5 13:42:23] DEBUG[1298] chan_zap.c: DTMF digit: 0 on Zap/1-1 [Sep 5 13:42:24] DEBUG[1298] chan_...

...own) Jun 6 21:08:46 DEBUG[2121]: devicestate.c:187 do_state_change: Changing state for Zap/3 - state 0 (Unknown) Jun 6 21:08:46 DEBUG[2141]: app_queue.c:471 changethread: Device 'Zap/3' changed to state '0' (Unknown) Jun 6 21:08:47 DEBUG[2133]: chan_zap.c:6638 do_monitor: Monitor doohicky got event Hook Transition Complete on channel 1 I am hoping against hope that it isn't a hardware issue. If anyone has any insights it would be very much appreciated. Thanks, Darin

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of J. Oquendo > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 6:47 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk brute force watcher (was FYI) > > Steve Totaro wrote: > > I suspect that

...77 zt_setoption: Set option TDD MODE, value: OFF(0) on Zap/1-1 Dec 17 11:22:59 DEBUG[3600]: chan_zap.c:1193 update_conf: Updated conferencing on 1, with 0 conference users -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1' Urgent handler Urgent handler Dec 17 11:23:00 DEBUG[3600]: chan_zap.c:5932 do_monitor: Monitor doohicky got event Hook Transition Complete on channel 1

...nce the immediate answer. Also, I'd be interested to know why there are so many format changes, and how I might force the format to alaw... So, in short, the queue_log logfile is wrong, but I can't find any information as to why.... Regards, Adam 2005-01-04 11:28:43 DEBUG[5537]: Monitor doohicky got event Ring/Answered on channel 125 2005-01-04 11:28:43 DEBUG[5967]: Launching 'Answer' 2005-01-04 11:28:43 DEBUG[5967]: Took Zap/125-1 off hook 2005-01-04 11:28:43 DEBUG[5967]: No echocancellation requested 2005-01-04 11:28:43 DEBUG[5967]: No echo training requested 2005-01-04 11:28:43...

Hi! Below is a link to a proposal I'm writing for two clients of ours who want an Internet-based backup solution. I propose eleven "objectives" in it, most of which are modifications to rsync. I'd like to contribute these changes back where possible, and so I'm posting this here for review. The nuts and bolts of it is the ability to keep multiple copies of files (think