search for: doo_dri

...n Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote: >> The DRI option with the intel ddx can be used to indicate the following >> - whether dri is disabled >> - the dri "version" - dri1, dri2, dri3 >> - the dri module name - doo_dri.so bar_dri.so >> >> I'm not sure how exactly it's supposed to work/works, and I believe >> most of that is due to legacy reasons. I'm just saying let's not do >> the whole thing - just the dri "version" would be great (as you >> suggested). I...

The DRI option with the intel ddx can be used to indicate the following - whether dri is disabled - the dri "version" - dri1, dri2, dri3 - the dri module name - doo_dri.so bar_dri.so I'm not sure how exactly it's supposed to work/works, and I believe most of that is due to legacy reasons. I'm just saying let's not do the whole thing - just the dri "version" would be great (as you suggested). -Emil On 4 July 2015 at 19:28, Ilia Mirkin...

That would be great, as long as it does only that and does not go into the "drivername" territory. As the said driver ;-) "A driver name to use can be provided instead of simple boolean value, which will be passed to the GL implementation for it to load the appropriate backend." -Emil On 4 July 2015 at 18:17, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > IMO

...gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> The DRI option with the intel ddx can be used to indicate the following >>>> - whether dri is disabled >>>> - the dri "version" - dri1, dri2, dri3 >>>> - the dri module name - doo_dri.so bar_dri.so >>>> >>>> I'm not sure how exactly it's supposed to work/works, and I believe >>>> most of that is due to legacy reasons. I'm just saying let's not do >>>> the whole thing - just the dri "version" would be great...